It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
9/11 was a demonstration of free energy technology. It can be used for good, but we need to make that choice and help others to as well.
-- Dr. Judy Wood
Also, motivation. What was the motivation for the terrorists to attack us on 9/11?
Because they were ready to carry out their plan on 9/11 as opposed to a different day.
Originally posted by nikiano
Also, motivation. What was the motivation for the terrorists to attack us on 9/11?
Because they were ready to carry out their plan on 9/11 as opposed to a different day.
That's not an answer, that's sarcasm.
When you're ready to post a serious theory of your own, as requested, and not sarcastic quips, I'll start to take you seriously.
Until then, I say you're just a debunker with an agenda.
[edit on 28-12-2008 by nikiano]
Originally posted by jfj123
I can't change the temp. by pretending the scientific instrument was wrong.
Originally posted by Jezus
Here I fixed it for you.
Originally posted by jfj123
I can't change the temp. by pretending the scientific instrument was wrong.
Me: I measured the stick with a ruler, it is a foot long.
You: No way, that stick is bigger than a foot, the ruler must be wrong!
Originally posted by jfj123
Unfortunately I need to correct your own analogy.
jezus: The ruler is 10 inches long
ME: The ruler says it longer then 10 inches
posted by jfj123
Unfortunately I need to correct your own analogy.
jezus: The ruler is 10 inches long
ME: The ruler says it longer then 10 inches
posted by Jezus
Exactly!
You must be wrong! The ruler doesn't know how to be wrong.
Either way you are trying to argue with the ruler.
Rulers don't have preconceived notions or a bias. They just measure. The fact that you make the wild assumption that the ruler is wrong without any evidence shows you aren't really interested in science, evidence, or proof.
posted by jfj123
Yes I agree the fact that you're ignoring evidence IS delusional.
posted by Jezus
LOL
You can't be serious!
Evidence = Proof of Temperature
Speculation = The fire was hotter
Assumption = The temperature reading must be wrong
This is a PERFECT example of fighting evidence with BS.
One side has evidence (in this case a temperature reading)
One side has speculation (the fire MUST be hotter) and makes an assumption (the equipment MUST SOMEHOW be wrong).
Evidence proves speculation wrong, not the other way around.
How can you possibly expect people to take you seriously when you can't even tell the difference between concrete evidence and unsupported guess work?
Originally posted by Jezus
Originally posted by jfj123
Unfortunately I need to correct your own analogy.
jezus: The ruler is 10 inches long
ME: The ruler says it longer then 10 inches
Exactly!
You must be wrong! The ruler doesn't know how to be wrong.
Either way you are trying to argue with the ruler.
Rulers don't have preconceived notions or a bias. They just measure. The fact that you make the wild assumption that the ruler is wrong without any evidence shows you aren't really interested in science, evidence, or proof.
[edit on 29-12-2008 by Jezus]
Originally posted by jfj123
No but the person looking at it and not understanding it is wrong. That's you my friend.
You simply don't understand that 451 F is hotter then 220 F. I can't fix that complete lack of understand of basic principles here.
May god have mercy on your soul
Originally posted by Jezus
Originally posted by jfj123
No but the person looking at it and not understanding it is wrong. That's you my friend.
You simply don't understand that 451 F is hotter then 220 F. I can't fix that complete lack of understand of basic principles here.
May god have mercy on your soul
Hmm...so if 452 F is hotter then 220 F...and temperature is 220 F (proven with evidence)...that must mean the temperature was lower than 452 F....
Their isn't anything to understand, you are arguing with a ruler...