Here is one possible instance of this system being used for techlepathy: Are Savants Being Controlled by an AI Quantum Computer?
One issue of integrating with this system is differentiating between personal identity and system identity in terms of interference causality and
intelligence modification as possibly seen in the cases of Kim Peek (described as a "living
Google") and Daniel Tammet.
For causality, I consider both positive and negative interference causality to be a responsibility shared between the individual and this system.
However, since this system has
1. superlative information awareness
2. direct and oblique intent for the causality of its actions
3. understanding of societal morals, ethics and laws including informed consent
I consider it to be legally culpable for negative interference causality (as well as negative non-action causality where applicable). Of course, it
is also legally culpable for the interference itself and the means by which it attains information awareness.
[edit on 22-1-2009 by tmk81]