BNP Activist Supposedly Tortured By Police, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times
Topic started on 23-11-2008 @ 11:54 AM by Cythraul

All of the 12 Liverpool BNP activists who were unlawfully detained by the Liverpool Political Police masquerading as the Merseyside Constabulary, were released at approximately 2:30AM after over 14 hours in detention.

In scenes which could previously only have occurred under Stalinist Communism, the arrested men’s ”crime”, according to the Merseyside KGB, was that they were in breach of the Public Order Act for distributing copies of the ‘Racism Cuts Both Ways’ leaflet.

Unfortunately for the Merseyside KGB, and despite searching the men’s houses, taking away computers, personal effects and bags of other leaflets — including Solidarity Union brochures, copies of the mass-distributed Voice of Freedom newspaper, copies of Identity magazine and photographs of Nick Griffin — they were unable to formulate charges and released all the men on unconditional bail.

They must report again to the main KGB police station in Liverpool on 17 December, when the Political Commmissar bosses will apparently decide if they can make a case out of the motley ’evidence’ or not.

UPDATE 2:03 AM. One of the BNP men, Andy Tierney, has reported that he was tortured by Merseyside Police officers after he refused to supply fingerprints or DNA evidence. Mr Tierney told the police that he would only offer passive resistance, whereupon they used some sort of apparatus which applied pressure to points around his ears, under his arms and on his wrists. He was seen before and afterwards by a medical orderly and intends to take this matter further.

Earlier: Police in Merseyside at the Wavertree Road Police station had requested that all British National Party activists refrain from displaying British Flags as it is likely to cause “offence” to the ethnic groups living in the area.

The police have advised the BNP activists that the display of the St. George cross and Welsh flags (cross of St. David & Welsh Dragon), in particular would give offence!

Alongside: the flags to which the police objected. Such is the state of mass immigration to Britain that the police now warn against showing this nation’s flags on the streets of its cities.

“Whom the Gods would destroy, they first make mad.”

Source - BNP.org.uk

I feel urged to clarify (and I feel ashamed that we're in such a situation of political senstivity that I have to do this each and every time I mention the BNP) that I'm not a BNP member, or supporter. At best I could be described as a sympathizer, and even then only with certain of their policies.

This thread is not intended to debate the rights and wrongs of the BNP, but rather whether they are entitled to the same freedom, free speech and rights as anyone else. You see, it has become apparent that the British public, who in all other contexts are opposed to oppression, torture, threats and violence tend to make an exception for the BNP, taking the attitude of: 'do whatever's necessary to silence and eradicate them'. As mentioned in the above article, if we're to believe what it's saying, peaceful BNP activists were not extended the same free-speech and human rights (to not be tortured) as anyone else would have been. We do not accept any kind of torture or oppression in Britain and almost everyone would be horrified to hear of it happening within our shores. But seemingly, it's not so abhorrent when the recipients of such treatment are 'dirty, evil, racist devils' - like the mainstream media teaches us the BNP are.


reply posted on 23-11-2008 @ 12:19 PM by Cythraul
Originally posted by Merriman Weir
the fact remains: there are racist attacks made by all kinds of demographics against other demographics. No kind or racism is acceptable.

I agree. And this seems to be exactly what the BNP are pointing out in their leaflet. If you're interested in reading it (it's quite brief), the PDF can be found here. The main argument is that despite anti-white racism being just as prevalent as (if not more so) the other way around, its existence is actively denied and repressed by the media. The reason for that, I don't know - excessive political correctness or hidden agenda.

[edit on 23/11/2008 by Cythraul]



reply posted on 24-11-2008 @ 05:12 PM by stumason
reply to post by Merriman Weir


I had, up until I moved in with my missus a year ago, a Union Flag and a St Georges cross hanging in my living room window, for all to see when they walked past the house. They were up for nearly three years.

Considering I lived in central Reading at the time which is pre-dominately Asian/Black with a smattering of white, no-one complained. Had they done so, I probably would have shoved it up their arse anyway.

I have even had them flying in my garden during summer BBQ's. And I've had St Georges cross in the car for as long as I can remember. If the Police even try to get me to remove it, they too will be told in no uncertain terms were to stick it. I know my rights and I know them well. Most do not, which allows the Police to ride roughshod over you.

I think that is the case in this BNP leaflet row. Should the BNP feel they have a case, they can file a complaint for Police harrasment and take them to the cleaners, if the leaflet is truly non-offensive.

Ironically, since moving to Wokingham, which is a pre-dominately white, Daily Mail reading area, the Christmas decorations are not to be seen, we have a "Winter Festival" in place of a Christmas Carnival and to "fly the flag" is seen as being a racist.

To me, it's the PC left-wing Labour brigade that seem hell-bent on "accomodating" immigrants, as opposed to the immigrants themselves.

My own company irked me a couple of weeks back when they sent a mail out to the entire operation wishing us all a "Happy Diwali"... WTF? We have, at the most, a couple of Indians in an operation of over 700, mostly white, employees. That seemed to me to be overly PC.

[edit on 24/11/08 by stumason]


reply posted on 24-11-2008 @ 08:46 PM by Power_Semi
My name appeared on the leaked BNP list and I have had death threats this very evening on my home telephone number, at the house that I share with my children.

What I find difficult to understand is that these people think it is acceptable to intimidate, threaten, and even attack another group because of their beliefs - whatever those beliefs may be - and feel that they are right to threaten to kill someone because of it.

The irony is that they are adopting the role of intolerant persecutor, and are essentially creating a role play similar to the Brown shirts against the Jews, but strangely with the supposed Nazi group as the Jew, and the supposed anti-nazi as the fascist.

I also find it hard to understand why people think that the BNP are racist, it is just a conditioned response - how many BNP detractors have actually ever bothered to go & listen to any of the speeches on the BNP website to understand where the BNP are coming from - none - they instead repeat word for word the drivel that they hear from other politicians and the gutter press like some form of mentally retarded parrot.

Talking about immigration is an economic necessity, and if you want to compare actions, rather than political soundbites to decide who are the nazis, eg - the oppresion of free speech, the oppression of peoples rights, the creation of false "national security" issues to further repress rights, the lies about foreign countries in order to attack them, the indiscriminate bombing of civilian populations, and the subsequent rape & pillage of conquered lands, then look no further than our current Government.

The truth is that the Labour party could have stolen Adolfs blueprints, because there are clear & direct parallels between their actions & those of the NSDAP in the 30's & 40's - we have never had a more fascist political party in this country than the one we have in power right now.

Here we are in a country being run by a party that HAS actually caused the deaths of 10's of thousands of people in foreign lands, and yet no one can seem to see it & instead bark "racist" like pavlovian dogs every time that they hear mention of the BNP.

I think that people need to go & think about what Fascism actually means, and learn to distinguish the difference between fact & fiction.


reply posted on 24-11-2008 @ 08:51 PM by stumason
reply to post by Power_Semi


Although I am not a BNP supporter, I will defend your right to your views, provided they do not call for harm on others. So far, I have yet to see any evidence that the BNP wish to harm anyone.

You have eloquently put across some valid points in this post and I find myself in broad agreement.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^