1960 - Failed Bay of Pigs to start WWIII
The Cuban Missile Crisis was the closest the world ever came to nuclear war. The United States armed forces were at their highest state of readiness
ever and Soviet field commanders in Cuba were prepared to use battlefield nuclear weapons to defend the island if it was invaded. Luckily, thanks to
the bravery of two men, President John F. Kennedy and Premier Nikita Khrushchev, war was averted.
Kennedy saw the photographs on October 16; 1962 [18] he assembled the Executive Committee of the National Security Council (ExComm), fourteen key
officials and his brother Robert, at 9.00 a.m. The U.S. had no plan for dealing with such a threat, because U.S. intelligence was convinced the
Soviets would not install nuclear missiles in Cuba. The EXCOM quickly discussed five courses of action:
1. do nothing
2. use diplomatic pressure to get the Soviet Union to remove the missiles
3. an air attack on the missiles
4. a full military invasion
5. the naval blockade of Cuba, which was redefined as a more restrictive quarantine.[19]
Unanimously, the Joint Chiefs of Staff agreed that a full-scale attack and invasion was the only solution. They agreed that the Soviets would not act
to stop the U.S. from conquering Cuba; Kennedy was skeptical, saying:
WWIII failed to start.
Illuminati formed the Iron Mountain Commission [1963] on how to set up for phasing in the USA citizens to be ready for a world government.
From the Iron
The Functions of War
The visible, military function of war requires no elucidation; it is not only obvious but also irrelevant to a transition to the condition of peace,
in which it will by definition be superfluous. It is also subsidiary in social significance to the implied, nonmilitary functions of war; those
critical to transition can be summarized in five principal groupings.
1. Economic. War has provided both ancient and modern societies with a dependable system for stabilizing and controlling national economies. No
alternate method of control has yet been tested in a complex modern economy that has shown itself remotely comparable in scope or effectiveness.
2. Political. The permanent possibility of war is the foundation for stable government; it supplies the basis for general acceptance of political
authority. It has enabled societies to maintain necessary class distinctions, and it has ensured the subordination of the citizen to the state, by
virtue of the residual war powers inherent in the concept of nationhood. No modern political ruling group has successfully controlled its constituency
after failing to sustain the continuing credibility of an external threat of war.
3. Sociological. War, through the medium of military institutions, has uniquely served societies, throughout the course of known history, as an
indispensable controller of dangerous social dissidence and destructive antisocial tendencies. As the most formidable of threats to life itself, and
as the only one susceptible to mitigation by social organization alone, it has played another equally fundamental role: the war system has provided
the machinery through which the motivational forces governing human behavior have been translated into binding social allegiance. It has thus ensured
the degree of social cohesion necessary to the viability of nations. No other institution, or group of institutions, in modern societies, has
successfully served these functions.
4. Ecological. War has been the principal evolutionary device for maintaining a satisfactory ecological balance between gross human population and
supplies available for its survival. It is unique to the human species.
5. Cultural and Scientific. War-orientation has determined the basic standards of value in the creative arts, and has provided the fundamental
motivational source of scientific and technological progress. The concepts that the arts express values independent of their own forms and that the
successful pursuit of knowledge has intrinsic social value have long been accepted in modern societies; the development of the arts and sciences
during this period has been corollary to the parallel development of weaponry.
Substitutes for the Functions of War: Models
The following substitute institutions, among others, have been proposed for consideration as replacements for the nonmilitary functions of war. That
they may not have been originally set forth for that purpose does not preclude or invalidate their possible application here.
1. Economic.
a) A comprehensive social-welfare program, directed toward maximum improvement of general conditions of human life.
b) A giant open-end space research program, aimed at unreachable targets.
c) A permanent, ritualized, ultra-elaborate disarmament inspection system, and variants of such a system.
2. Political.
a) An omnipresent, virtually omnipotent international police force.
b) An established and recognized extraterrestrial menace.
c) Massive global environmental pollution.
d) Fictitious alternate enemies.
3. Sociological:
- Control function.
a) Programs generally derived from the Peace Corps model.
b) A modern, sophisticated form of slavery.
- Motivational function.
a) Intensified environmental pollution.
b) New religious or other mythologies.
c) Socially oriented blood games.
d) Combination forms.
4. Ecological. A comprehensive program of applied eugenics.
5. Cultural. No replacement institution offered. Scientific. The secondary requirements of the space research, social welfare, and/or eugenics
programs.
www.bibliotecapleyades.net...
NOTE: Obama advisor raises concerns
Zbigniew Brzezinski defended attack on US Jewish lobby; but analysts warn against hasty conclusions
Concerns have been raised among Israel supporters following the appointment of a controversial veteran political advisor by Democratic presidential
candidate Barack Obama. Last week, Obama introduced Zbigniew Brzezinski as "one of our most outstanding thinkers" during a policy speech on the Iraq
war. Brzezinski, selected by Obama to advise him on foreign policy affairs, has taken a highly critical stance towards Israel in the past, and has
defended an academic attack on the American Jewish lobby which has been branded by some as being anti-Semitic. He has previously served as a national
security advisor to President Jimmy Carter.
www.ynetnews.com...
Now, keeping this in mind, read the following and then decide whether there is something really sneaky going on.
Next attempt to Martial law was during Nixon's presidential period and this involved the Watergate. It was too early because two issues were not
discussed in previous meetings. One, the number of weapons that individual Americans had and second, the Islamic obstacle to this Luciferian One
World Government. Sadat was in the way.......hint hint.....
1973: Formation of the Trilateral Commission for the next planning stage leading to the next attempt as martial law...........
In 1973, David Rockefeller asked Zbigniew Brzezinski to put together an organization of the top political, and business leaders from around the World.
He called this group the Trilateral Commission (TC).
The stated goals of the Trilateral Commission are: "Close Trilateral cooperation in keeping the peace, in managing the world economy, in fostering
economic redevelopment, and alleviating world poverty will improve the chances of a smooth, and peaceful evolution of the global system." (Emphasis
added.)