posted on Jan, 22 2003 @ 07:32 PM
Well judging from the time when these pics were taken with the capable resolution, and the corresponding dunes, I'd say that "craft" is well over a
mile long. What ever it is, if it impacted, it would have "skid" further, or left a larger mark.
Oh but the ejecta blanket looks more like a slide, and the wall on that side of the feature looks to have been the source of the slide. The winds
have blasted the surrounding areas but the larger features remain, particularly the fact that some dune features are still partly showing through the
slide area, the ground probably isn't just sand so dunes I'd say are the wrong words...this object must be high too, maybe 1000 feet.
This site sure sucks at giving reference points for judging sizes. Maybe their zealousness caused them to leave those crucial bits of evidence
Oh perfect, I found evidence of the true size, though it doesn't help to determine actual size, other than that it is quite large. Too large to be
any craft, a good sized hill (and if you've seen rattlesnake hill here in reno, you'd know that this is by far a possibly natural formation,
rattlesnake hill looks like a giant tutle shell, as round as a basketball, and 600 feet high)
Anyways, go to the larger pic, by clicking on the thumbnail, and you'll notice small craters hidden in what looks like dune features, now under good
resolution, those dunes would seem some 20 feet big, but those dunes are bad resolution not dunes, which can be seen by looking at how it overlaps the
The surface of this land can't be determined it is too large a scale, I would imagine those "small" craters to be a few hundred feet in diameter in
their own right.
The guy claims this object is only some 100meters at most, but I must disagree, it's just too poor a resolution to judge, compare viking photos with
the face on mars, with recent photos.
The only amazingly intelligent object is the 5-sided pyramid, which I must say, the Mars freaks that geometrically aligned the Pyramid to the Face,
are idiots, I remapped the geometry of the pyramid myself, based on the given info of the pyramid itself, disregaurding the face, and it is amazingly
geometrical...more so than the contrived looking Mars freaks pictures.
I wish I could show you the picture, also the pyramid faces near north, I'm betting since mars's magnetic fields are localized into annomalies, that
the 5 sides each correspond to a "magnetic north". If only I could find better maps of the whole planet...
[Edited on 23-1-2003 by FreeMason]