It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by WildSkyView
FactCheck.com has a conflict of interest as it's owned by one of Obama's close partners. -- I wouldn't even waste my time with that site.
Originally posted by David9176
Let's hope our 2nd amendment rights aren't infringed upon if he becomes president. We've had enough of our rights tainted and abused. It has to stop sometime.
We get the Patriot Act and wiretapping and our fourth amendment stepped on, we get a bail out package that is paid for with our money and no one bats an eyelash, but then suddenly someone might want to restrict weapons and MY GOD ITS TIME TO GO TO WAR
Originally posted by jtma508
I'm an avid gun owner. Always have been. I own a variety of weapons including AW's. I'm not adn Obama supporter but I'm certainly not a McCain supporter. As important as gun rights are, to excuse all of McCains shortfalls just because he appears to be gun-friendly is ludicrous. It's like Joe the Plumber and the general 'I'll vote for what's good for me personally not what may be good for the country as a whole'. The 2nd ammendment is important and we need to amke sure that NO ONE infringes that right. Whether it's Obama, Pelosi or the man in the moon. But it is certainly not in the country's best interst to pin an entire ellection on one aspect. I'm heartily against illegal guns. Round them up. Put automatic death penalties, life without parole, woodchipper feet-first on any violent crime committed with an illegal gun. Fine. But defending our 2nd ammendment rights is separate from the President or Congress. They have to be made aware --- without equivocation --- that we will NOT tolerate an infringement of the 2nd Ammendment.
Originally posted by xmotex
That's why this gun owner will be voting for Obama this year.
[edit on 10/27/08 by xmotex]
Originally posted by sos37
If the ads are stating facts, his voting record, then his campaign has no legal or ethical right to demand that they not be shown.
Originally posted by David9176
reply to post by davion
His voting record speaks for itself. It doesn't matter if you think what the NRA is proclaiming is true or not....the point is that based on his voting record it is a possibility to see our 2nd amendment rights infringed upon.
I swear it seems that some people are willing to just give this man the benefit of the doubt.