posted on Oct, 10 2008 @ 10:44 AM
We're all entitled to our opinions and I find myself agreeing with just about every post so far, to a certain degree.
However, we weren't personally involved.
I mean, when I first saw this thread, when it consisted of only the OP, I clicked out. On one hand, I could understand how a parent could be driven
to killing a paedophile. At the same time, if we condone such killings, it could be an innocent member of our own family who's wrongly accused by an
emotional mob, based on circumstantial evidence. Finally, do we know for sure that paedophilia can be controlled? Or does Nature condemn some to be
Could I, would I, kill a paedophile. Yes, I believe I could/would.
It's a crime for which no amends can possibly be made. And paedophiles remain 'incurable': this was the conclusion reached at the conclusion of a
decades-long study conducted in the UK, including attempted 'rehabilitation', aversion and dozens of other psychological and chemical etc.
therapies. Paedophiles, even into extreme old age, continue to seek victims. They are least able to be rehabilitated of all the sexual perverts.
Could I, would I, kill child pornographers and their ilk ? Yes, if possible I would join a group of likeminded individuals and do all in my power to
rid the world of these foul scum. They are protected by the scum in office and they are befouling our planet more every day, putting everyone's
child at risk and murdering others and filming it so that once-normal individuals are introduced to paedophilia and develop an addiction for it.
Oh yes, I would most certainly support anyone prepared to rid the world of child pornographers and their ilk. And I would support the death penalty
for this purpose, particularly in the case of judges, lawyers, polilticians and those engaged in education and child care. The world could only be
improved if they were permanently eradicated.
However, it's the paedophile members of the legal fraternity, parole boards, legislators, media, etc. who have made themselves virtually immune from
prosecution and have ensured they will never be exterminated. And we, concerned members of the public and parents, know this. We know the situation
has grown worse and is getting worse each day. We know that right now, fathers, grandfathers and uncles are sitting before their computers, deriving
perverted, inhuman, sexual gratification from watching child pornography on their home computers or even at work. Some .. who knows how many .. are
going to act out the sexual desires stoked by child pornography.
Few if any are apprehended. If they're 'connected' (members of male-only 'clubs' for example, or have brothers in the police force or a 'good'
lawyer .. they're not even going to go to trial. Those who are convicted get a slap on the wrist penalty. Parole boards appear to be peopled by
lunatics and satanists who're delighted to release those whom they know to be an active danger to society and to children in particular.
And it's because the law proves itself hourly to be an ass and because law-abiding members of the public have been given no reason to have faith in
the law, that people are driven .. driven .. to take the law into their own hands. The law has failed them. Justice has not been done, is not being
seen to be done. All the onus is placed upon the public .. those whom the law has failed. The public is told to 'leave it to the law' .. ' you
have no right to take the law into your own hands' .. 'justice is mine saith the Lord' .. ' vigilantism is the refuge of the inherently lawless',
But at the end of the day, when a man or woman's little child has been violated by an animal and perhaps murdered, these lofty advices are seen to be
a cruel joke. And they are. The law has not only failed to protect children against paedophile and against serial paedophiles in particular .. it
has laughed in the faces of the victims and their parents and chosen to show 'understanding' and 'forgiveness' to the offender. It's Frankism in
Members of parole boards should be publicly identified. Why are their identities hidden ? Self evident, isn't it ? They KNOW they are endangering
society and THEY do not want the backlash to reach them !
In my opinion, members of parole boards who release scum into the community are aiders and abetters in these crimes and THEY should be
convicted and jailed. I wouldn't shed a tear if a paedophile victim's parent killed a few parole board members and threw them in the woods for good
measure .. because they, as well as the paedophile .. are guilty of the crimes committed against the child victims !
As for the dead paedophile .. do I shed a tear or feel sympathy?
No. It's my belief that if someone knows they are a paedophile, then they should have the courage and conscience to kill themselves, rather than
foist themselves and their sickness on child victims.
Do I believe the world to be a better, safer place now that paedophile is dead?
Yes. I'm glad they're no longer on the planet.
If they had no control over their sickness, well .. it's up to God to fix them now.
Do I condemn the paedophile's killer ?
No. There but for the grace of God goes any one of us, had circumstances been different.
For you see, the paedophile will claim, once he's been apprehended, that he had 'no control' over his actions. In other words, he's attempting to
claim a mental abberation, a mental illness if you like.
But you'll notice the paedophile is not so 'mentally ill' that he will leave clues to his identity. Instead, he does all in his power, after his
crime, to protect his own liberty. His own liberty is paramount to him. He wants to remain free in order to attack other children.
And when he is incarcerated for his crimes, he obviously very easily convinces supposedly 'expert' assessors that he is 'repentant' .. that he is
'rehabilitated' .. that he is 'no longer a danger to society'.
Hah ! So much for the 'experts' and for the ninnies who form parole boards. They release these creatures back into society, despite overwhelming
evidence to show that paedophiles are NEVER 'cured' or 'rehabilitated' and remain always a danger to society.
Do we release wild wolves into children's playgrounds?
Do we dump toxins on children's heads?
Then WHY are paedophiles released back into the community ?
And *IF* a wild wolf was roaming a children's playground .. what would we do .. what would 'the law' do ? We'd put it down, wouldn't we ? We'd
put it out of action. We'd shoot it. We'd make sure it could never again be a danger.
I feel very sorry for the parent who was so betrayed by our legal system that he was compelled by that legal system's failure, to do the legal
system's job for it. That person undertook to ensure that paedophile would never again be a danger to any child. But that parent (if it was a
parent and not a now grown victim of that paedophile) now has to live with that killing. He/she should NEVER have had to do the job which ' The
Law' is PAID to do.
I just wish the paedophile had died, in whatever manner, several decades earlier, instead of being permitted to exist for 70-plus years. I hate to
think of how many victims he destroyed during his lifetime.