Reinhardt Thread - "Suggestions and Predictions", page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 72 times


reply posted on 2-10-2008 @ 12:11 PM by shermanium
from the page



my point is that MSFT can be vulnerable on the down-side during an across the board (with the exception of “banking” at the time) crash


[edit on 2-10-2008 by shermanium]


reply posted on 2-10-2008 @ 06:45 PM by MatrixBaller04
The more and more I read his site, the more I feel like I'm getitng it. But I am still so lost. All of this talk about Tyco, Enron, Microsoft, and Bill Gates is really confusing.

But from what I've read on page 1 alone, I have gotten out of it that George Bush is the king and this entire economic crisis is controlled. The ones running the show are transferring all of our technology to foreign countries (India?), and then they are going to crash our economy. And the only way to come back out of a depression is to go to war. WW3.

there is one and only one rea$on for the King to suspend the writ


COMMANDING GENERAL ARMY OF THE UNITED STATES:

You are engaged in repressing an insurrection against the laws of the United States. If at any point on or in the vicinity of the military line which is now used between the city of Philadelphia via Perryville, Annapolis City and Annapolis Junction you find resistance which renders it necessary to suspend the writ of habeas corpus for the public safety, you personally or through the officer in command at the point where resistance occurs are authorized to suspend that writ.

ABRAHAM LINCOLN.


He is hinting at something.... Possibly
George W. Casey, Jr.? He is the current Chief of Staff of the United States Army

If the buildings had come down in 1993, Enron, GlobalCrossing, WorldCom, Tyco, etc.. would have been bought and paid for by a limitless, invisible “war-on-terror” budget..

.. often referred to as the “fog-of-war”.



So he is saying that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is the new Enron scandal.

Hmm...So...We could think of the U.S. as Enron, Bush as the CEO, and our economy as Enron's stocks.

It's all planned. WE are the new Enron Scandal.

Does this make any sense to anyone? At all? Or am I just completely wrong?

I wish reinhardt posted on here so he could help us out and tell us if we are getting it or not.

[edit on 2-10-2008 by MatrixBaller04]


reply posted on 2-10-2008 @ 07:42 PM by Breifne
reply to post by MatrixBaller04



Don't worry - on a confused scale of 1 - 10, I am nearer to 9.82 than 1! (btw: 10 equates to falling off the confused tree and hitting every confused branch on the way down)!

IMHO, the ''King'' is not George Bush, but possibly the Jesuit General (a high ranking religious leader with little perceived commercial value or public eye attention).

The financials are the driving force and the political leaders with strong religious affiliations are the operational tools - the puppets. Corporation generals (those without military insignia)) and big bankers are the ''accountants'' ensuring that daily operating levels are being met and the appearance of a well oiled machine is in place - after all, their golden parachutes are truly made of 'gold'.

(this part needs to be confirmed or supported by someone in the know): Lincoln did not 'free the slaves' per se as the slaves were the property of men, thus legally they could not have been affected by the emancipation proclamation unless each owner (the rich) 'freed' each slave (the poor). The proclamation of 1863 was a front, a side issue although Lincoln was apparently not knowing of this at the time - ''short sighted'' he was referred to as (as per post on pg 2). Again, he was the face of the operation and not the owner of it, just like Bush - a 'signatory' of legislation and not the true inspiration of it.

(Bush - is he really running America: the reason I call him a well-placed plant. If anything goes wrong, blame Bush. But what does he care, he and his entire administration are multi-millionaires, they did not get that by being good at their jobs surely, how can 32% be right)?

IMO, maybe the slave issue is an analogy for the rich bankers and religious leaders stealing off the poor (taxpayers) through debasement, defrauding the system (wall street, Medicare, military industrial complex and their double and tripple billing of ''their own'', and on and on) at the behest of the 'poor' masses (taxpayers) that pay their wages, yet when the scheme requires an injection of some real money or a kick start - the accountants get to work on their operational greasing.

When the master rings the bell, the 'successful' failures begin in earnest with pinpoint accuracy, the masses start herding around with their 'patriotic' support.

So, they are rich and getting richer and we are greasing their wheels whether they succeed or fail. The kicker is - when they fail big time, that's when the true money is made.

So, from market crashes and revolutions to wars - they don't fight do they and they certainly never end up in the poor house? Do they pay their taxes? Last time I looked, the Grand Cayman and trust funds are exempt. We are the slaves to the machines and no legislation is going to change that.

I'll stop now as I am reaching a self-inflicted '10'.

Breifne


reply posted on 2-10-2008 @ 10:23 PM by shermanium
www.baltimoresun.com...



"The one thing that's been proven is the absolute fear-mongering that's being used to drive us is false," Sherman said. "I've seen members turn to each other and say if we don't pass this bill, we're going to have martial law in the United States."



reply posted on 2-10-2008 @ 10:27 PM by shermanium
www.mercurynews.com...



Glitch causes brief but wild swing in Google share price


By Elise Ackerman
Mercury News
Article Launched: 09/30/2008 04:51:59 PM PDT

Erroneous trades sent to the Nasdaq Stock Market by another exchange caused Google's share price to gyrate wildly Tuesday afternoon, soaring as high as $485.13 and falling as low as $25.80.

The Nasdaq issued a statement Tuesday afternoon saying that all trades in Google's shares made at or above $425.29 and at or below $400.52 between 3:57 and 4:02 p.m. would be canceled. The statement said Google's official closing price would be adjusted to $400.52, an increase of 5 percent over the previous day.



reply posted on 3-10-2008 @ 02:06 AM by MatrixBaller04
Originally posted by shermanium
www.baltimoresun.com...



"The one thing that's been proven is the absolute fear-mongering that's being used to drive us is false," Sherman said. "I've seen members turn to each other and say if we don't pass this bill, we're going to have martial law in the United States."






I'm so glad he stood up and told it like it is.

[edit on 3-10-2008 by MatrixBaller04]


reply posted on 3-10-2008 @ 05:23 AM by justyc
reply to post by ATSfan



the correct way would be 'advice'...

but a lot of people mix up 'advice' and 'advise' so it could be a simple mistake .

** just to clarify - did you see it spelled that way?

[edit on 3-10-2008 by justyc]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



USDA Forces Whole Foods To Accept Monsanto
  Posted 10 days ago with 99 member flags
Greece wipes out Citizens Debt!! Tells Bankers to suck it
  Posted 11 days ago with 78 member flags
The Collapse of The American Dream Explained in Animation
  Posted 18 days ago with 53 member flags
Obama on the verge of a deal with the banks
  Posted 16 days ago with 23 member flags
EU financial dictatorship agreed to by EU ministers last night
  Posted 18 days ago with 17 member flags
Bankers requesting that Greece become their debt slaves
  Posted 14 days ago with 15 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 14 hours ago, 68 replies