It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Former US Air force Pilots Behind WTC, Pentagon Attacks: Iranian Daily
The Iranian Kayhan evening newspaper revealed that the perpetrators of Tuesday's attacks in New York and Washington were former pilots in the US Air Force, and that hijacking in fact did not take place but was used to cover the real scenario of the incidents.
Kayhan cited from American reports that the pilots' not using the alarm button, usually used in emergency or danger circumstances, is still considered one of the most obscure clues in this case. This indicates, according to the newspaper, that the four pilots carried out the suicide operation in purpose, and that the hijacking story is not correct.
The report disclosed that three of those pilots were former Vietnam veterans, while the brother of the fourth died in that war. The report listed the names of the pilots as follows:
Charles Berlingim, Flight 77's pilot. He ploughed his plane into Pentagon where he worked for several years.
Jason Dahil, Flight 93's pilots. His plane was shot down over Pennsylvania. His brother (Kenneth) killed in Vietnam in 1971 at an age of 20 years.
Joe Agotawski, Flight 11's pilot. He ploughed into the World Trade Center's first tower.
Victor Sarasini, Flight 75's pilot. He ploughed into the second tower. The newspaper referred to the clear contradiction in the information disclosed by the two airline companies, American Airlines and United Airlines, and the one disclosed by the FBI.
Three days after the incident, the FBI issued a list of the passengers' names including the names of the 19 alleged Arabs whose names were not in the companies' list issued a day after the incident.
However, Kayhan stopped at journalistic reports that indicated no trails of a plane being crashed at the Pentagon. Also it focused on the fourth plane that was shot down by US warplanes in Pennsylvania and that the pilot did not plough the plane by himself in defiance to hijackers' request to head to a populated area.
The newspaper based its information on what the French Agency mentioned that pieces of the plane were found four miles away from crash site, which means the plane was blown out in the sky by missiles fired from US warplanes, according to the newspaper.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Notice the comments about Flight 93 being shot down.
It seems more and more reports are coming out abot Flight 93 being shot down.
Originally posted by exponent
Notice the date of this article. It is also not exactly a reliable source, being an anti US state controlled paper.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
It might be a anti US state but depends also on where the information came form and if it can be verified.
Originally posted by exponent
Where did the information come from? Have you verified it?
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Well if you read the post it states at the end some information came from the French.
Speaking of verification, have you verified any of the official stories information?
Originally posted by beachnut
The shoot down of 93 was debunked on 9/11 with all the debris from the fuselage impact being south of the crater, and confirmed by the FDR with all systems running to impact.
Originally posted by exponent
Sure, I've verified as much as is possible for a layman to do, at least as much as I have seen substantial criticism of.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
So show what you have verified and what you used to verify it like FOIA request, E-mails and the research sites.
Originally posted by exponent
I have investigated criticisms of the NIST report and found them to be invalid. I am not about to start making a list of everything they got right in the 11,000 pages.
If you want to discuss specific facts I am more than happy to do so, but you will need to support your assertions with more than your personal beliefs and convictions.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
We will start with those few for now.
Originally posted by Crakeur why would they have three complete the task and the fourth be shot down only to cover up the downing of that plane.
'
Originally posted by exponent
Repeating points that have already been addressed does not somehow make them valid.
Originally posted by Crakeur
kinda contrary to your original post, no?
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
So you can show an actual photo or video of AA77 hitting the Pentagon, or a report matching parts found to the 9/11 planes?