It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by loam
reply to post by intrepid
Still...
"Punished" by a baby and "burdened" by a baby are two different concepts. If it's not a slip up, the use of the term 'punished' is still somewhat revealing and at the heart of the difference between the world view of those who are pro-choice and those who are pro-life.
[edit on 2-9-2008 by loam]
The McCain campaign on Monday did not respond to repeated requests for information.
In Senate votes, McCain has opposed some proposals to pay for teen-pregnancy prevention programs. In 2006, McCain joined fellow Republicans in voting against a Senate Democratic proposal to send $100 million to communities for teen-pregnancy prevention programs that would have included sex education about contraceptives.
In 2005, McCain opposed a Senate Democratic proposal that would have spent tens of millions of dollars to pay for pregnancy prevention programs other than abstinence-only education, including education on emergency contraception such as the morning-after pill. The bill also would have required insurance companies that cover Viagra to also pay for prescription contraception.
McCain voted for the Family Support Act in 1988, which passed overwhelmingly in the Senate and required teen mothers who receive public assistance to remain in high school and, in some cases, to live with their parents.
Originally posted by intrepid
What slip up? He didn't slip up. The quote was taken out of context by the OP. In other words, not true. What Obama DID say is quite true. Educate the kids so that they aren't burdened by matters that they are incapable of handling.
Originally posted by sos37
Originally posted by loam
reply to post by intrepid
Still...
"Punished" by a baby and "burdened" by a baby are two different concepts. If it's not a slip up, the use of the term 'punished' is still somewhat revealing and at the heart of the difference between the world view of those who are pro-choice and those who are pro-life.
[edit on 2-9-2008 by loam]
I have to agree. Poor choice of words or not, I think it's revealing of Obama's true character.
Originally posted by yeti101
reply to
do you think its right to force someone to have a child they dont want?
Originally posted by TruthWithin
What in the HELL does this have to do with the election?
Originally posted by yeti101
reply to post by sos37
forcing someone to have a child they dont want is physical & mental torture in my opinion. The christian fundies dont seem to have a problem with that though
Originally posted by jamie83
Intrepid, I strongly disagree that the quote was taken out of context. Here is the relevant portion of the quote:
"...look, I've got two daughters. 9 years old and 6 years old. I am going to teach them first of all about values and morals. But if they make a mistake, I don't want them punished with a baby."
Originally posted by yeti101
reply to post by jamie83
by making abortions illegal.
Originally posted by intrepid
He's talking about edcucation so that kids don't have kids, or STD's. He's NOT talking about abortion at all. That is perfectly clear if you read the "irrelevent" parts.
It's only relevent if you're putting words in his mouth as opposed to what he actually said.
Originally posted by KaginD
Obviously you are pro life. I have a question for you though. Lets say a 12 year old girl gets raped and ends up pregnant. Do you think that she should have to have the baby???
No, making abortions illegal doesn't force anybody to have a baby. It might force them to live somewhere where abortions WERE legal, but it doesn't force them to have a baby.
Originally posted by maybereal11
Really this is a dumb debate. Can we expect this kind of BLOWN OUT OF PROPORTION MINUTIA to continue from Jam, Sos, Jetx etc?
Anything to muddy the waters and distract from the real issue or questions of experience?
For f^&ks sake enough of this ugly crap and irrevelant BS.
Originally posted by jamie83
Originally posted by intrepid
He's talking about edcucation so that kids don't have kids, or STD's. He's NOT talking about abortion at all. That is perfectly clear if you read the "irrelevent" parts.
It's only relevent if you're putting words in his mouth as opposed to what he actually said.
Intrepid, I'm really surprised by the weakness of this argument. Your reasoning is usually much more well founded.
Unless you think I have some supernatural powers, I did not put these words in Obama's mouth. Again, here are the words that flowed from his lips...
"...look, I've got two daughters. 9 years old and 6 years old. I am going to teach them first of all about values and morals. But if they make a mistake, I don't want them punished with a baby."
How can you say I put these words in his mouth?
Originally posted by intrepid
He's talking about edcucation so that kids don't have kids, or STD's. He's NOT talking about abortion at all. That is perfectly clear if you read the "irrelevent" parts.