It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by asmeone2
That is very interesting.
While celibacy is a valid choice, I would wonder if the program really "worked" since the process is to turn them into functional heterosexuals? I would think that if we say homsexuality is wrong because it doens't produce kids, the same is true for celibacy.
Originally posted by asmeone2
reply to post by ScienceDada
The thing I have an issue with there is that if you "cure" homosexuality, then that person should be able to have a fulfiling relationship with the opposite sex, NOT simply abstain from sex, period.
Technically this person is not gay as s/he is not having homosexual relationships, but s/he is not fully "cured," because s/he is not acting in her "proper" gender role.
Originally posted by Good Wolf
Everyone stopped posting. Did I weird everyone out?
Originally posted by Good Wolf
But the point that I would raise is that celibacy is not natural- I'd even sub-human. The suppression of sexuality, a fundamental biological drive, is not healthy and really should not be done. Hundreds of thousands of years of Natural selection makes sex an important part of the life of all animals on Earth and to deny it is to deny major internal function- and even to deny ones humanity, this kind of thing is pathological. Many can't take the strain of celibacy which is why you get so many paedophile priests court cases.
Originally posted by asmeone2
Hello, I'd like to start a topic discussing the religious-based programs that are supposed to cure homosexuality and, to a lesser degree, pornography addiction.
Originally posted by Good Wolf
My point was that sexuality is part of a healthy human, and is natural behaviour of beings that reproduce with two sexes (not asexual), and that no amount of religious beliefs and rituals, meditation or what ever can make man not be what he is, man, that is an animal. The religious will say that man is above animals, why?
This is why I don't see celibacy as a positive result. If anything. it's a cop-out.
Its a cause. And after all if everyone went celibate, man would end in one generation, so bottom line is that sex is necessary.
As for homosexuality, it comes down to your beliefs, especially in religious people.
But I'm not religious, so in my opinion homosexuality is not evil. But I do believe that it can be reversed, it's just that if people who go into religious programs for this reversal are coming out celibate, that tells me that the programs are not working.
Originally posted by redled
All a religious authoritarian state can do is give power to the few, not the many.
Originally posted by darkelf
Religion can't cure anything.
Originally posted by ScienceDada
Originally posted by redled
All a religious authoritarian state can do is give power to the few, not the many.
This is so warped on many levels. The worst authoritarian states in the world have been atheistic, namely Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. At least be honest when referring to authoritarianism, especially in our day and age.
But even more, to say that society now must ignore thousands of years of wisdom and now accept homosexual couples with a "married" status equal to that of a traditional marriage makes that society a "religious authoritarian state" is just a bizarre leap of logic.