Notice On All 911 Truthers

reply to post by MajicMan


give me a sec im going to give you a number

this is sick now about the ship 02.55.25 play it from there

Thanks I'll check it out.

AHHH I see!... Now I may seem a little slow here, but the coast guard eventually identifies the vessel as a "crusie ship." Maybe I need to brush up on my military lingo; but when I think of cruise ship, I think of luxury cruises (i.e. princess cruises, carnival cruises). You know, the types you take vacations on. My initial reaction was how do we know that they weren't talking about a boat with a bunch of tourists from the UK? Then I realized that you saw the vessel of the coast of the prison (if i remember correctly). Is there any call signs, terminolgy, whatever that the military uses to decipher military vessels from civilian vessels?

reply to post by MajicMan



alot of laws been broking right there because one of our friends over seas do the deads.? another words they USED the uk to do the job.
and that could really jeopardizes relations also Espionage, and other crimes. it is the most smoking gun ever pulled on 911 on the ship controlled THE DRONES to the targets. also the towers (chopper2) not build 7.
build 7.



i am so pist off right now i feel like #

www.aurora.aero...


operation Aurora

[edit on 19-8-2008 by hardstyle]

Originally posted by hardstyle
reply to post by MajicMan

 

alot of laws been broking right there because one of our friends over seas do the deads.? another words they USED the uk to do the job.
and that could really jeopardizes relations also Espenage, and other crimes. it was one of the most smoking gun ever pulled on 911 no the ship controlled THE DRONES to the targets. also the towers not build 7.

i am so pist off right now i feel like #

www.aurora.aero...


operation Aurora

Thats quite an accusation. What evidence do you have to back this claim?

In the artilce in the link that you poster Aurora refers to the company that manufactured the drones. So, they named the operation after the manufactureres of the drones? Also, to clarify aurora was the name of the operation, not the name of the UK milirtary ship off the coast of Atlantic City?

reply to post by The Dispatcherator


i seen THE dam 2 drons i can not tell no one yet you guys are going to screech your head but as right now im to p@st off. the other stuff i cannot post our talk about . this is dangerous.
im going to stay low .



yes i do have the evidence .. also the 2 choppers.

Originally posted by hardstyle
reply to post by The Dispatcherator

 

i seen THE dam 2 drons i can not tell no one yet you guys are going to screech your head but as right now im to p@st off. the other stuff i cannot post our talk about . this is dangerous.
im going to stay low .



yes i do have the evidence .. also the 2 choppers.

OK, so now we've reached the crux of your argument? You saw two drones.... when exactly was this, and where? whatd they look like? how many people observed this? what other evidence do you have? what reason would we have to believe you? There is no reason to believe this is "dangerous". Why not tell us your real name and story, go on record, you know, like hundreds of other people have in reference to the events of 9/11? if you're not willing to tell people about it, why are you here?

what about this "suspicious 600-800 foot while-hulled vessel named The Aurora anchored off atlantic city, with 800 crew and 400 passengers on board and a british flag" makes you think it was a base for the perps? Seems to me they wouldnt want to be anchored near a coast guard station while doing this #?

the coordinates for the ship are here:
google map
thats not really very close to boston or NYC or DC...

more interesting is the E4B Airborne Command Center spotted 182 miles SE of Chicago by Indy Center.


[edit on 19-8-2008 by The Dispatcherator]

[edit on 19-8-2008 by The Dispatcherator]

[edit on 19-8-2008 by The Dispatcherator]

Theres always a catch with threads like this.

The catch being, no mp3 and also the fact that the guy was arrested for smoking pot.

What is to say that this is not a paranoid delusion created from a decade of smoking pot?

In my opinion Bull.

im gonna have to break all down on u2u because this is gonna f@uck your head up there no wings right at the pen ?

reply to post by The Dispatcherator


those cats (brits) was not suppose to be there in the first place its on record. all of the sudden there bound to new york on rescue mission?
on record.






[edit on 19-8-2008 by hardstyle]

those tapes was mess around it dint came from there (indy)
did you saw the map i posted?


1 drone took off from f.a.a (jersey). 93 transponder
on record " 9th and 10 "
1 drone took off from McGuire air force base 77 transponder
on record " 9th and 10
i was not the only person that saw these 2 same drones
they flow down by us which is south jersey flight path.


i was standing facing south east. that's out to the ocean its pretty high up
from east to south west . check out the map

same formation with fighter jets F 18 and 1 thunderbolt


they transfer 1 to Ohio
on the record. 10th same day that's the one that hit (77 ) pantgon.
there a prob here t
the ship was in jersey shore for 3 days the 9 an 10 .11th

correct drones is the 2 pic

www.aurora.aero...

when the pantgon got hit

i was in the van. now any transfer( it gets written down)
for the record


now were there wings in the pen? none but there a wxit hole correct?

im gomma have to come back in a min



[edit on 19-8-2008 by hardstyle]

[edit on 19-8-2008 by hardstyle]

[edit on 19-8-2008 by hardstyle]

[edit on 19-8-2008 by hardstyle]

[edit on 19-8-2008 by hardstyle]

I have also been following this post as well and would like to ask you to be more precise in your comments. I have looked over all 14 pages of this and feel lost as i read...

But at the same time i would like to thank yoiu for sticking around on the post... good luck.

reply to post by MajicMan


LOOK any ship that comes to our port gets check out im telling you the truth. what they pulled off its like the bay of pigs style and i cant wait to contact some of my friends on record that those tapes been mess around. its hard to explain

now every one know about the exit hole correct at the pentagon?

No, please inform me on the exit hole... underground im assuming??

reply to post by no one special


underground?

incorrect

Hardstyle, is this the ship you are talking about?




ATS, wouldn't it make sense to track the location of this ship on the days of 9/9/01-9/11/01?

It shouldn't be that hard to find the records of movement.

Does anyone have the resources? Ships are required to maintain logs.

Here is a link to the site I found this on for a start.

Aurora

Originally posted by hardstyle
reply to post by The Dispatcherator

 

i seen THE dam 2 drons i can not tell no one yet you guys are going to screech your head but as right now im to p@st off. the other stuff i cannot post our talk about . this is dangerous.
im going to stay low .

yes i do have the evidence .. also the 2 choppers.

Ok, lacking coffee but still trying to grasp what you're getting at here.

1. You are saying that a UK based ship was controlling two drones?

2. You have solid evidence of the above, if that is indeed what you are stating?

Yes/No/Maybe ???