reply to post by Manasseh
Ok. There is no atmosphere on The Moon. The Lunar Lander would never have been able to get off The Moon without thrust.
Originally posted by Manasseh
reply to post by Phage
OK smarty pants, then you tell me. What is the burning of the rocket fuel pushing against to move the space shuttle.

Originally posted by ScienceDada
Originally posted by Manasseh
reply to post by Phage
OK smarty pants, then you tell me. What is the burning of the rocket fuel pushing against to move the space shuttle.
Either this is a joke, or "serious" discussion between a bunch of guys stoned, or you are infants or retards.
What are you talking about? A rocket burns fuel in space in a chamber, this produces pressure, the hot/pressurized gas shoots out the cone. The force is transmitted through the pressurized gas from the cone, so that is where the rocket gets its acceleration from.
From the viewpoint of this essay these two theories are fundamentally incompatible in the sense illustrated by the relation of Copernican to Ptolemaic astronomy: Einstein's theory can be accepted only with the recognition that Newton's was wrong. Today this remains a minority view.
Originally posted by Manasseh
reply to post by truth_seeker3
How are you, that has all the answers.
I do not know you.
Originally posted by windwaker
reply to post by Manasseh
Ok. There is no atmosphere on The Moon. The Lunar Lander would never have been able to get off The Moon without thrust.
