If there is no air in space, how do they use rockets to position the space shuttle?, page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 13-8-2008 @ 11:54 PM by Manasseh
reply to post by Taledus



Jeez.

Satellites are propelled into space by using earth as something to push against.

They are held in space by the speed they travel (centrifugal force.. or is it centripatal) and the gravity pull of earth.



reply posted on 13-8-2008 @ 11:55 PM by Fuggle
reply to post by Taledus



This is the most depressing thread I've ever seen on ATS. The OP seems absolutely unwilling to consider the information being shared by people far more knowledgeable than itself. I'm amazed that people are even trying to reason with this individual.

OP: the space shuttle's propulsion doesn't require dense atmosphere to manouvre or position itself.


reply posted on 13-8-2008 @ 11:56 PM by jamamiss
Originally posted by Manasseh
reply to
post by Taledus



Jeez.

Satellites are propelled into space by using earth as something to push against.

They are held in space by the speed they travel (centrifugal force.. or is it centripatal) and the gravity pull of earth.


No. They are held in space by periodically firing rocket boosters. When they stop doing that, they fall back to earth.


reply posted on 13-8-2008 @ 11:58 PM by weedwhacker
reply to post by abelievingskeptic



AMEN!

I have been called controversial, simply becuase I understand some simple scientific facts.

My attempt to explain, based on the title of this thread, was heartfelt. It goes ignored.

I am very sorry I fell, again, for a very stupid game. My intent was true, my knowledge is true, my heart is true.

This should not continue....it is nonsense.

ps....the OP seems to be of a religious persuasion....so he can certainly post his comments in a thread, in a religious forum. Would make better sense.



reply posted on 14-8-2008 @ 12:00 AM by Manasseh
reply to post by weedwhacker



If you don't like the debate, don't participate.

Hey, that rhymes.

Just trying to provoke some thought.

You folks started with the putdowns..

Night night.


reply posted on 14-8-2008 @ 12:01 AM by Taledus
reply to post by Manasseh



Prove it! According to you, we've never been to space, in turn, debunking every aspect of logic in your assessment of your theory. But since you seem to be much more "blessed" with a special ability to understand that in which you claim everybody else is unable to explain:

A simple question...What is an atom?

Explain that and you will be rich!


reply posted on 14-8-2008 @ 12:04 AM by Phage
reply to post by guyatstore



You make it hard to reply without making a one liner.

Yes.

More precisely, the gas/particles that are ejected will keep going until something stops them or causes them to change direction.

[edit on 14-8-2008 by Phage]


reply posted on 14-8-2008 @ 12:05 AM by EnlightenUp
Originally posted by Manasseh
reply to
post by EnlightenUp



Then those molecules would continue their journey into supposedly endless space, without any affect on the propulsion plant producing them.

Molecules without any resisting force will continue to travel away from the force that produced them without any affect on the initial molecule producing force.. How much does a molecule weigh? How many molecules must one produce to produce just one pound of thrust, when there is nothing to push against.?

Weight is a product of gravity.




It is alot of molecules. However it would take half the amount of molecules to produce the same thrust if you change their velocity relative to the craft by twice as much.

It would take one pound of a material per second accelerated by 32.2 feet per second to produce one pound of thrust. It would take one half pound of material per second accelerated by 64.4 feet per second to produce one pound of thrust as well.

Once the molecules are expelled by the rocket then the only force continuing to act upon them is whatever gravitational field happens to be present. If they're going fast enough relative to the planet, they'll probably travel off into deep space. If not, they may go into orbit or fall back into the atmosphere.


reply posted on 14-8-2008 @ 12:06 AM by jamamiss
reply to post by guyatstore



Yes. That is known as the Law of Inertia, or Newton's 1st Law.



reply posted on 14-8-2008 @ 12:06 AM by abelievingskeptic
reply to post by weedwhacker



I am pretty sure this was some pathetic attempt at some type of religious banter. He obviously didn't live in a realm of logic.

You are the retired pilot right? That must mean you have some knowledge But this guy obviously could careless about what anyone with credible knowledge says.

This thread should be closed.


reply posted on 14-8-2008 @ 12:14 AM by jamamiss
reply to post by badmedia



I think you might be mistaken about satellites. They do apply. Without repeated rocket boosts and/or a very high orbit, they will fall to earth. Even with a high orbit, all satellites will eventually fall back to earth.


reply posted on 14-8-2008 @ 12:15 AM by alienj
reply to post by Manasseh



Gravity exist in every corner of the universe, believe it or not there is gravity in space. Also every action creates a reaction. Have you never seen James Bond throw a ranch in one direction to go the other direction. Just becasue there is a so called a vacuum doesnt mean you cant have thrust.


reply posted on 14-8-2008 @ 12:16 AM by Silver Shadow
I am absolutely stunned that none of you guys understand jet or rocket propulsion, it is junior grade physics.

The basic idea is that you have a chamber with a high pressure inside. Imagine something like a compressed scuba diving tank, or a propane bottle, or maybe even a party balloon. This pressure might be measured in pounds per square inch, or some other suitable unit.

Now in a completely closed sealed container, this internal pressure pushes outwards equally in every direction. There is no external thrust generated (obviously) because the internal pressure pushes outwards the same in every direction.

Now suppose suddenly you cut a hole in one end of this tank.. The internal pressure still pushes in every direction EXCEPT where the hole is. So the internal foces OPPOSITE the hole push the tank in that direction.

If there is 100 psi in the tank, and a one square inch hole, there will be 100 lbs of thrust against the inside of the tank opposite where the hole is. This is 100 lbs of unbalanced forces, and it acts INSIDE the tank. It needs no external air to push against.

A jet engine works exactly the same way. It is the forces innside the engine that push the engine in a forward direction. The gasses coming out the back are just a release of pressure. Jet engines require external air for combustion. Rockets do not.

Getting back to rocket engines. A simple hole will not work very well, because all the gas pressure inside the engine will suddenly just empty out of the hole, leaving no high pressure inside the engine. There would then be nothing to push against the front of the inside of the engine.

What is done is you fit a sonic nozzle to the engine. This is a convergent, divergent cone, the classic rocket nozzle shape. This creates a sonic shock wave inside the narrowest part of the engine to keep a very high pressure buildup inside the engine. This higher internal pressure greatly increases the thrust. The shape of this nozzle is critical to getting optimum thrust. But that thrust comes from the high pressure inside the combustion chamber, not from the exhaust "pushing" against anything.

Hope that helps..




This is all pretty basic stuff. Surprised you guys have never heard it all before.
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>    ^^TOP^^



WWIII - USS Enterprise, a dying Legend to be the FALSE FLAG !! ??
  Posted 17 days ago with 64 member flags
A Gigantic Pyramid on Ocean Sea Floor in Bermuda Triangle?
  Posted 11 days ago with 45 member flags
"The Internal Working Components of One type of UFO".
  Posted 15 days ago with 37 member flags
A new find, is hollow Earth real?
  Posted 19 days ago with 34 member flags
The Argument that Fukushima Was Sabotaged
  Posted 12 days ago with 14 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Stop Bashing Us Military Folks.
  Rant, Posted 16 hours ago, 189 replies
Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 11 hours ago, 106 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 7 hours ago, 79 replies