It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Gateway Saakashvili won't be president of Georgia for much longer if things keep going this way I can see the fool being the first one on the plane outta Teblisi if the Russians come.
Originally posted by Gateway
All the WARMONGERS on this thread thirsty for Russian blood are the same Neocons that brought us Iraq, and beating the drums to attack Iran, and now want a war with Russia...
Complete idiocy, what is it with killing that you guys love so much...
Why the Neocons love their little beloved Neocon State Georgia...
The anti-Russian bias of the Western media is really something to behold: "Russia Invades Georgia," "Russia Attacks Georgia," and variations thereof have been some of the choice headlines reporting events in the Caucasus, but the reality is not only quite different, but the exact opposite. Sometimes this comes out in the third or fourth paragraph of the reportage, in which it is admitted that the Georgians tried to "retake" the "breakaway province" of South Ossetia. The Georgian bombing campaign and the civilian casualties – if they are mentioned at all – are downplayed and presented as subject to dispute.
The Georgians have been openly engaging in a military buildup since last year, and President Mikhail Saakashvili and his party have been proclaiming from the rooftops their aim of re-conquering South Ossetia (and rebellious Abkhazia, while they're at it). Avid readers of Antiwar.com saw this coming. In a column entitled "Wars to Watch Out For," I wrote: "As President Mikheil Saakashvili deflowers his own revolution and shuts down the opposition media, he could well try to divert attention away from his political problems by ginning up a fresh conflict with the breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, both of which are protected by Russian troops and regional militias."
Read the rest of the article here:www.antiwar.com...
[edit on 11-8-2008 by Gateway]
Originally posted by mike dangerously
Gateway Saakashvili won't be president of Georgia for much long if things keep going this way I can see the fool being the first one on the plane outta Teblisi if the Russians come.
Originally posted by Gateway
All the WARMONGERS on this thread thirsty for Russian blood are the same Neocons that brought us Iraq, and beating the drums to attack Iran, and now want a war with Russia...
Complete idiocy, what is it with killing that you guys love so much...
Why the Neocons love their little beloved Neocon State Georgia...
The anti-Russian bias of the Western media is really something to behold: "Russia Invades Georgia," "Russia Attacks Georgia," and variations thereof have been some of the choice headlines reporting events in the Caucasus, but the reality is not only quite different, but the exact opposite. Sometimes this comes out in the third or fourth paragraph of the reportage, in which it is admitted that the Georgians tried to "retake" the "breakaway province" of South Ossetia. The Georgian bombing campaign and the civilian casualties – if they are mentioned at all – are downplayed and presented as subject to dispute.
The Georgians have been openly engaging in a military buildup since last year, and President Mikhail Saakashvili and his party have been proclaiming from the rooftops their aim of re-conquering South Ossetia (and rebellious Abkhazia, while they're at it). Avid readers of Antiwar.com saw this coming. In a column entitled "Wars to Watch Out For," I wrote: "As President Mikheil Saakashvili deflowers his own revolution and shuts down the opposition media, he could well try to divert attention away from his political problems by ginning up a fresh conflict with the breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, both of which are protected by Russian troops and regional militias."
Read the rest of the article here:www.antiwar.com...
[edit on 11-8-2008 by Gateway]
[edit on 11-8-2008 by mike dangerously]
Originally posted by wutone
Its not that the U.S. can't do anything, its that things will get really sticky if the U.S takes action.
The U.S. can easily defeat (not overrun and conquer) Russia in a conventional war. The U.S. can easily take control of the Black Sea and use submarines with cruise missiles to rain hell on the Russian military. The U.S. can easily send thousands of troops and heavy equipment from Iraq, through Turkey, and into Georgia and set up an effective defense.
The problem is those damn nukes. I don't think any leader will put hundreds of millions at risk for the fate of one small country.
Originally posted by The_Alarmist2012
reply to post by misswanderer31
To support Georgia in any Military way would mean a US war with Russia.
I'm not sure anyone on either side wants that to happen.
You can expect no less from a total puppet of the TPTB.The Georgians sholud hand him over to the Russians once this is over with.
Originally posted by Gateway
Originally posted by mike dangerously
Gateway Saakashvili won't be president of Georgia for much longer if things keep going this way I can see the fool being the first one on the plane outta Teblisi if the Russians come.
Originally posted by Gateway
All the WARMONGERS on this thread thirsty for Russian blood are the same Neocons that brought us Iraq, and beating the drums to attack Iran, and now want a war with Russia...
Complete idiocy, what is it with killing that you guys love so much...
Why the Neocons love their little beloved Neocon State Georgia...
The anti-Russian bias of the Western media is really something to behold: "Russia Invades Georgia," "Russia Attacks Georgia," and variations thereof have been some of the choice headlines reporting events in the Caucasus, but the reality is not only quite different, but the exact opposite. Sometimes this comes out in the third or fourth paragraph of the reportage, in which it is admitted that the Georgians tried to "retake" the "breakaway province" of South Ossetia. The Georgian bombing campaign and the civilian casualties – if they are mentioned at all – are downplayed and presented as subject to dispute.
The Georgians have been openly engaging in a military buildup since last year, and President Mikhail Saakashvili and his party have been proclaiming from the rooftops their aim of re-conquering South Ossetia (and rebellious Abkhazia, while they're at it). Avid readers of Antiwar.com saw this coming. In a column entitled "Wars to Watch Out For," I wrote: "As President Mikheil Saakashvili deflowers his own revolution and shuts down the opposition media, he could well try to divert attention away from his political problems by ginning up a fresh conflict with the breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, both of which are protected by Russian troops and regional militias."
Read the rest of the article here:www.antiwar.com...
[edit on 11-8-2008 by Gateway]
[edit on 11-8-2008 by mike dangerously]
If the Georgian people and military are smart they'd remove this guy from office, before the Russians come-in, for getting them involved in this mess. All he did was bring death and destruction to a people that were just trying to live their lives a week ago.
Just a total stupid miscalculation by Saakashvili.
[edit on 11-8-2008 by Gateway]
Originally posted by all2human
There are no innocents in war ,bolth are equally guilty