It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
www.firehouse.com...
We were worried about additional collapse there of what was remaining standing of the towers and the Marriott, so we started pulling the people back after a couple of hours of surface removal and searches along the surface of the debris. We started to pull guys back because we were concerned for their safety.
We pulled everybody back probably by 3 or 3:30 in the afternoon. We said, this building is going to come down, get back. It came down about 5 o�clock or so, but we had everybody backed away by then.
Originally posted by gavron
The quote you listed below from Chief Hayden seems to indicate he is pulling men back, not buildings down. Or perhaps i'm reading the quote wrong.
Originally posted by gavron
I still cannot find that it has ever been done before.
Originally posted by gavron
[ So there really have been no demolitions of standing 20+ story buildings that were on fire ever before? That is just your opinion?
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Well i am going by the statements of the Fire Chiefs.
What are you going by?
Originally posted by ThroatYogurt
Show us where the Fire Department states that they brought down WTC-7.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Originally posted by gavron
I was wondering why that had never been done before, and now you just confirmed it hasnt.
–Larry Silverstein
"I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse."
Release date: September 23, 2007
Regarding WTC 7: The long-awaited US Government NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) report on the collapse of WTC 7 is due to be published at the end of this year (although it has been delayed already a few times . That report should explain the cause and mechanics of the collapse in great detail. Early on the afternoon of September 11th 2001, following the collapse of WTC 1 & 2, I feared a collapse of WTC 7 (as did many on my staff).
The reasons are as follows:
1 - Although prior to that day high-rise structures had never collapsed, The collapse of WTC 1 & 2 showed that certain high-rise structures subjected to damage from impact and from fire will collapse.
2. The collapse of WTC 1 damaged portions of the lower floors of WTC 7.
3. WTC 7, we knew, was built on a small number of large columns providing an open Atrium on the lower levels.
4. numerous fires on many floors of WTC 7 burned without sufficient water supply to attack them.
For these reasons I made the decision (without consulting the owner, the mayor or anyone else - as ranking fire officer, that decision was my responsibility) to clear a collapse zone surrounding the building and to stop all activity within that zone. Approximately three hours after that order was given, WTC 7 collapsed.
Conspiracy theories abound and I believe firmly that all of them are without merit.
Regards, Dan Nigro
Chief of Department FDNY (retired)
[Fire Engineering magazine, 10/2002]
"The biggest decision we had to make was to clear the area and create a collapse zone around the severely damaged [WTC 7] building. A number of fire officers and companies assessed the damage to the building. The appraisals indicated that the building's integrity was in serious doubt."
"I am well aware of Mr. Silverstein's statement, but to the best of my recollection, I did not speak to him on that day and I do not recall anyone telling me that they did either. That doesn't mean he could not have spoken to someone from FDNY, it just means that I am not aware of it."
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Please do not be so immature as to put words in my mouth. I never stated it has not been done before, in fact i have stated that the fire marshalls and fire chiefs do have the authority to demo a buidling in an emergency. Something that you cannot debate.
Originally posted by ThroatYogurt
Ultima? where is the part about him blowing up the building??
And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse."
For these reasons I made the decision (without consulting the owner, the mayor or anyone else - as ranking fire officer, that decision was my responsibility) to clear a collapse zone surrounding the building and to stop all activity within that zone. Approximately three hours after that order was given, WTC 7 collapsed.
Originally posted by gavron
But I am debating that.
Originally posted by gavron All I want is just one example of where a 20+ story burning building has been brought down in a controlled manner, by the fire dept or a demo team, prior to 9/11.
Originally posted by gavron
I believe you are the one stating that the building was "pulled down".
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
But we do have evidence from the fire chiefs.
Originally posted by gavron
Well, actually you dont have any evidence.