evidence for a NASA coverup, page 2

Originally posted by gottago
Just to recalibrate a bit, NASA losing the original recordings of Apollo 11 on the moon is like the National Archives announcing they'd lost the original Constitution and Bill of Rights.

Pure nonsense.

Apollo 11 has not been mentioned:
but since you seem to have an explanation for missing data, you may explain this:

Titan which have been lost in 2005?

SATURDAY, JANUARY 15, 2005

A missing computer command - apparently the result of human error - caused the loss of half the pictures taken by Europe's Huygens probe as it descended to the surface of Saturn's moon Titan. But project officials said today the 350 pictures that made it back, along with high-quality data from the spacecraft's other instruments and unexpected measurements by Earth-based radio telescopes, should fulfill all of the mission's primary objectives.

www.spaceflightnow.com...

reply to post by internos

---

thanks for your reply,

You kindly suggested to me a a book: i will read it. I am a very ignorant guy who needs to learn.
Did you read “THE RINGMAKERS OF SATURN” by Norman Bergrun?
Do you know Norman Bergrun?

i have not read Ringmakers of Saturn but i am aware of the general concept of the book. i did read the thread about it here on ATS, i believe it was you or MikeSingh that was the OP of it and it was a great thread.

i think the next book i want to read is Dark Mission from Hoagland and there was a thread in skunkworks about it and i posted a picture from the op and Zorgon was going to look into it but not sure if he did or not. maybe you know something about this picture ?



www.darkmission.net...
Welcome to Dark Mission

www.darkmission.net...
What if NASA had discovered unimaginable wonders


www.abovetopsecret.com...
Dark Mission, page 1



[edit on 6-7-2008 by easynow]

reply to post by easynow

---

I'm trying not to gobble hoaxes and pre-digested thinking. I want truth not fiction. So instead of posting some random unreferenced image, very hard to trace back to a NASA picture, can you please post ONE clear cut case of obvious coverup by NASA you seem to know about. Anything that can not be easily explained by data loss, pareidolia, misidentification, human errors, hardware artifacts, software glitches, hoaxes? All I see is jumping to conclusions without any critical thinking. Videos with ominous music are not proof. A picture of a weird looking rock is not proof of alien technology. Evidence is not proof. If you don't have independent confirmation, you have nothing.

If what you posted is the best you have, try again.
-Lost Apollo 11 tapes: so what? Just a copy.
-The Kecksburg Pennslvania UFO incident: was it was not a meteor?
-I saw structures on the Moon... yeah I see them too. Are they artifacts?
...

i am sick about this kinda stuff how about you ?

I am tired of reading stupid "analysis" made by delusional nutcases, idiots and hoaxers. I am disgusted by all the mud slinging.

Video about NASA smudging photographs




www.youtube.com...

reply to post by nablator

---

I want truth not fiction.

you can't handle the truth it seems to me, but it's good to have your own opinion.

So instead of posting some random unreferenced image, very hard to trace back to a NASA picture, can you please post ONE clear cut case of obvious coverup by NASA you seem to know about.

i never said i had a photo like you want. but there are many on the web. try looking instead of trashing me. whatever evidence i bring up will probably not be good enough for you anyway's....

All I see is jumping to conclusions without any critical thinking.

things aren't alway's as they seem even with critical thinking fyi

Evidence is not proof.

duhh........were does it say that i am presenting ' proof ' ???

If what you posted is the best you have, try again.
-Lost Apollo 11 tapes: so what? Just a copy.
-The Kecksburg Pennslvania UFO incident: was it was not a meteor?
-I saw structures on the Moon... yeah I see them too. Are they artifacts?

"lost tapes ..so what ?" ...where is your critical thinking ?

the point of the Kecksburg info was to show that NASA didn't deliver the documents. nice try at distorting the facts...

structures on the moon...i can't make you see something you don't want to

I am tired of reading stupid "analysis" made by delusional nutcases, idiots and hoaxers.

personal attacks are against the rules here FYI

nobody asked you to look at the thread...have a nice day...

[edit on 6-7-2008 by easynow]

reply to post by easynow

---

you can't handle the truth it seems to me, but it's good have your own opinion.

You would be surprised. I've been looking for years. Sorry for being harsh in my last post. It's the videos, they drive me mad.

About Kecksburg, I agree with you, actually. I didn't know NASA admitted loosing two boxes of records. Good point.

Peace.

reply to post by Spock Shock

---

thanks for the post,

cool name by the way


here is a video about the noises/music ? they recorded from the moon....since you brought it up.

While I think the majority of those images in Moon photos which people think are air-brushings are just data transmission artifacts, I found the story of the analyst Donna Tietze to be somewhat compelling.

NASA airbrushing? The Donna Tietze Interview

Duplicate interview. (easier reading)
NASA airbrushing? The Donna Tietze Interview

Both are pro-UFO sites, but they get the general story across.

Puzzling.

reply to post by Turiddu

---

thanks for your post,

It just doesn't make any sense for them to cover up something like this.

Here is your answer...

The most obvious reason for NASA to cover up is that if the information were made known, there would be a threat to national security.

members.aol.com...
Why Would NASA Cover Up?

there are religious implications as well and if there is alien technology that would take you off the grid...they are not going to tell you about it

Originally posted by Grey Magic
reply to post by redoubt

---

I find your post excellent.

Indeed why should it be the US who discloses the truth?

Indeed - why should it be the US who discloses first? Yet this is what the French and the Chinese have both lamented - that they are 'not allowed' to go public with their own stuff, until the USA approves it. Go figure!

Duncan

Anyone could of told you this.

I think the best man in the world can tell you this


Look him up. He hacked into NASA and has said there are "FILTERED" and "UNFILTERED" images. High Government Officials View the "UNFILTERED" images. And the public is fed the airbrushed "FILTERED" images.

NEVER trust Nasa

If it was up to them they would but a huge curtain around earth.

Originally posted by nexusmagazine

Originally posted by Grey Magic
reply to post by redoubt

---

I find your post excellent.

Indeed why should it be the US who discloses the truth?

Indeed - why should it be the US who discloses first? Yet this is what the French and the Chinese have both lamented - that they are 'not allowed' to go public with their own stuff, until the USA approves it. Go figure!

Duncan

The USA doesn't RUN the WORLD!

They can come forward with anything they want.

I'm tired of everyone thinking the USA runs the entire world when they DON'T.

Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 8 days ago with 65 member flags

Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 16 days ago with 60 member flags

UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 11 days ago with 31 member flags

The Dyatlov Pass Incident--Russia\'s Mountain of Death
  Posted 18 days ago with 28 member flags

The Edge of Reality - Updated Report on the Illinois Police UFO case, January 5th, 2000.
  Posted 4 days ago with 27 member flags

The Aurora, Texas UFO Incident (1897)
  Posted 2 days ago with 27 member flags

Famous Argentinean painter observed UFO studying parabolic antennas
  Posted 19 days ago with 21 member flags

1/28/2012 craft in sky From Puerto Rico - Need help getting more info!!
  Posted 6 days ago with 21 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: