Granted, a lot of people/scavengers will be on the lookout for unprotected farmlands for them to pilfer vegetables.
All the more reason to do things honestly.
It doesn't matter how mobile you are, if you are in a group near the beginning you have to be prepared for the event of targeted strikes on your position.
Those fighters, warships and submarines aren't just going to go away because there isn't an acting political or commanding element anymore.
What will you do if there’s a year of poor harvest? Your stock probably won’t last until the next harvest and you can’t depend on hunting, fishing if you are in a big group of people.
Larger groups have larger quantities of supplies, thus making them more of a target than a single person.
We'll keep an eye out for your platoon, and the raids you plan to do on a small family or two. Unbelievable.
Originally posted by jackinthebox
reply to post by RubyGloom
We'll keep an eye out for your platoon, and the raids you plan to do on a small family or two. Unbelievable.
Quite believeable actually, survival of the fittest. No one asked if it would be more moral to not be in a group, the question is, would it be better or not to be in a group for survival.
I'm not saying I would go in and raid families for their goods, but if it was a matter of my own kids eating or not, you can bet I would.