It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mythatsabigprobe
How would their safety be taken properly into consideration if the city council was mislead into believing this was just a regular indoor range?
Originally posted by mythatsabigprobe
And do they let you fire through the walls and roof where you shoot?
Originally posted by The Nighthawk
In my mind there's a huge difference between using civilian software experts to train soldiers in the use of a particular company's systems and using a "civilian paramilitary contractor" (which shouldn't even be allowed to exist IMO)
Originally posted by The Nighthawk
But, it's not a building. This isn't just an "indoor firing range". It's a group of thin-walled metal shipping containers combined to create a close-combat simulation. Bullets will go right through that stuff.
Originally posted by The Nighthawk
Why did they have to put that within San Diego city limits?
Originally posted by jsobecky
reply to post by The Nighthawk
Originally posted by The Nighthawk
In my mind there's a huge difference between using civilian software experts to train soldiers in the use of a particular company's systems and using a "civilian paramilitary contractor" (which shouldn't even be allowed to exist IMO)
This is the sum of your entire problem. You object to the very existence of Blackwater. You are biased and prejudiced. You would never be allowed to sit on a jury in a case involving them.
Unfortunately, your dislike is irrelevant. Blackwater is a legal entity. This is a case about their rights as a legal, private entity. You don't want to discuss that.
Originally posted by jsobecky
reply to post by The Nighthawk
Originally posted by The Nighthawk
But, it's not a building. This isn't just an "indoor firing range". It's a group of thin-walled metal shipping containers combined to create a close-combat simulation. Bullets will go right through that stuff.
Prove it. Prove that this is just not hysteria and fear on your part. Show me the specs of the buildings.
AP News
The city responded that the company misled officials about the nature of the center, which includes a multilevel mock ship built out of cargo containers, to avoid triggering a full review by the city planning commission and a possible City Council vote.
...
It said Blackwater's plan to use the warehouse for "paramilitary training" makes it different from other firing ranges. Sailors would move around the mock ship with firearms instead of remaining stationary, as at an indoor firing range.
Originally posted by The Nighthawk
Why did they have to put that within San Diego city limits?
Originally posted by The Nighthawk
So what? I don't have to be impartial. As a concerned American, I have a right to voice an opinion that frankly, many, many other Americans share.
Originally posted by The Nighthawk
And, your statement is a complete and total deflection. You dodge my questions with meaningless rhetoric about my bias.
Originally posted by The Nighthawk
Unfortunately, your dislike is irrelevant. Blackwater is a legal entity. This is a case about their rights as a legal, private entity. You don't want to discuss that.
Yes, I absolutely do. But, ANY discussion of their "rights as a legal private entity" must, due to the nature of their business, include a discussion about the legitimacy of their intentions--and that requires a serious look at just how "legal" they are. We're not talking about a construction company here--we're talking about mercenaries, hired killers, who have acted as a proxy for US military forces abroad, have been implicated in incidents that would result in swift and brutal discipline had they been sworn members of the standing military, and have not been called to task for those incidents.
There is a pattern forming around Blackwater of using political influence to both evade accountability and to overstep the authority of local governments in getting what they want. The fact that they are a mercenary outfit, something many Americans believe to be inherently un-American, makes this decision even more controversial. If they were a software company I wouldn't have a problem with it, but they aren't, are they? My objections are 100% relevant in the context of this discussion or ANY discussion about Blackwater.
Originally posted by The Nighthawk
But, it's not a building. This isn't just an "indoor firing range". It's a group of thin-walled metal shipping containers combined to create a close-combat simulation. Bullets will go right through that stuff.
Prove it. Prove that this is just not hysteria and fear on your part. Show me the specs of the buildings.
I don't have to show you squat. Read the article snippet again:
Originally posted by The Nighthawk
Cargo containers are not bulletproof. If you've ever lived next to a railroad you'd know--they ship them by train all the time, and the metal forming their "skin" is pretty thin.
Originally posted by The Nighthawk
That's funny--I thought local governments had rights too, such as the right to deny individuals and companies from engaging in activities that pose a clear public risk.
Originally posted by Daedalus24
reply to post by jsobecky
Private company or not, we don't want them here. Perhaps I'm generalizing but I personally don't want a "company" which can do anything without being able to be brought to justice. They killed Iraqi civilians and they can't be brought to court either here or in Iraq? That's too shady for me.
so, as a San Diegan I have the right to say, go build your stupid training center somewhere else Blackwater, I don't want you here.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Let's see...they are a legal, private company. They have broken no laws.
Why shouldn't they be able to operate in San Diego?
Just because you don't like them is not reason enough to keep them out, now is it?