It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Fight Club Pub.

page: 476
40
<< 473  474  475    477  478  479 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 04:56 PM
link   
reply to post by skeptic1
 


Lol, sure seems like that doesnt it, In my debate, Im still waiting for S-dogs first post




posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 05:01 PM
link   
reply to post by MemoryShock
 


Funny how .... "This New Group" seems to be the only ones that have had trouble with the rules...

tick
tick
tick
tick



Flame away



posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 05:03 PM
link   
reply to post by budski
 


Happy B-Day, man!

Have an extra one for me.



posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 05:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by semperfortis
reply to post by MemoryShock
 


Funny how .... "This New Group" seems to be the only ones that have had trouble with the rules...


It's cause we're just a little smarter and our brains are just a little more flexible than you old-timers'



posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 05:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by OzWeatherman
reply to post by skeptic1
 


Lol, sure seems like that doesnt it, In my debate, Im still waiting for S-dogs first post


Well we wouldn't want that: www.abovetopsecret.com...




posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 05:08 PM
link   
reply to post by americandingbat
 


It would seem to me, to be the other way around..

Just an observation mind you...


(And just picking)



posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 05:09 PM
link   
Btw, my apologies to my opponent for only using 9999 characters.

I just couldn't find enough to say in order to use my full allotment.



posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 05:10 PM
link   
reply to post by semperfortis
 


But it's you folk who were apparently unable to locate the numerous loopholes and inconsistencies in the rules



posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 05:12 PM
link   
I had one more paragraph and a So. question to ask and I was cut off... This is bs. on the counter it gave me plenty of leway, I am so gonna get nailed for this...



posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 05:17 PM
link   
*****I forgot to do spell check***************

Vodka.



posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 05:20 PM
link   
reply to post by antar
 


You also messed up the "bold" bb code. Though if you send a U2U to semper or shock they will be happy to help with that.


Vodka is on its way!



posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 05:22 PM
link   
reply to post by antar
 


Somebody say Vodka???




Pick your poison.....



posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 05:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by skeptic1
reply to post by antar
 

Somebody say Vodka???


Yes, they said Vodka not crap!


Here you go Antar:







[edit on 19 Feb 2009 by schrodingers dog]



posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 05:24 PM
link   
I think I have made the shortest char. post in the history of the FCP --232 and half of them were an and external list


And that's all I'm gonna say about that



posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 05:24 PM
link   
reply to post by schrodingers dog
 


You aren't nice.

:shk:







posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 05:26 PM
link   
reply to post by americandingbat
 



But it's you folk who were apparently unable to locate the numerous loopholes and inconsistencies in the rules


Apparently there aren't any as we have yet to have to change the rules.

Just clarification is all that has been needed..

tick tick tick

More flaming now



posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 05:28 PM
link   
reply to post by semperfortis
 


I thought the rules were pretty self-explanatory.....

...hides...



posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 05:31 PM
link   
reply to post by semperfortis
 


I am sensing a disturbance in the force.

As if someone is trying to be something they're not.

The sweetness is strong within you Mr. Fortis

But not as in the sweetest of all sweeties.



posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 05:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by schrodingers dog
Btw, my apologies to my opponent for only using 9999 characters.

I just couldn't find enough to say in order to use my full allotment.





Thats ok, you still got another 2 posts



posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 05:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by semperfortis
reply to post by americandingbat
 



But it's you folk who were apparently unable to locate the numerous loopholes and inconsistencies in the rules


Apparently there aren't any as we have yet to have to change the rules.


Does that mean you'll take con on my earlier suggestion of a post-tournament debate on "The ATS Debate Forum Source Rules Require A Complete Overhaul?"

I'm not going to make you guys change things in the middle of a tournament, though



new topics

top topics



 
40
<< 473  474  475    477  478  479 >>

log in

join