Fight Club Pub.

reply to post by schrodingers dog


And knowing how you like to portray yourself........

reply to post by schrodingers dog

double post

never mind it serves the purpose of turning the page



[edit on 5/12/2008 by budski]

Originally posted by Heike
@Orange: I don't agree with your translation. ""Wer sich nicht wehrt, lebt verkehrt" would, in my opinion, be more like "Who does not resist, lives wrongly." Although, wrongly is an awkward word. "Verkehrt" is one of those German words that doesn't have a perfect translation, but it means something like "amiss, or the wrong way around."

i have to confess: i didn.t do that translation.
found it on the web.


maybe insteat of that akward "wrongly" incorrect?
the expression is so lovely in german - so i would love to have the correct or appropriate english translation


messed up isn.t the right expression for my feeling.
it is more the meaning, that somebody doesn..t live the right way, the appropriate way
for punks

don.t know if you got your coffee heike – so here (another) cup



a piece of cake - anybody?



reply to post by Heike

nobody - at least of the generation younger than 60 cares about nudity. it is kind of normal, which doesn.t mean that german people run around nude.
you also talk very open with other girls about female subjects

does anybody know the show desperate housewives?
some of the prudish attitudes and behaviour of bree and susan is very akward for most of my fellow country (wo)-men



reply to post by MemoryShock



congrats Osciatate!

great debate

well fought mick!


btw. i would like to have another or 2 shots of memory's bottle of last night!

day was exhausting but great
son is happy and i am …… tired

reply to post by budski



doesn.t it depend on the topic being debated?

did anybody ever debated without sources?

reply to post by MemoryShock



the 10-sentences-rule is the limit of quoting for one post, isn.t it.


@s-dog and budski
thanks for the wonderful youtube-mini.debate

reply to post by orange-light


We've had them before - they're rather good fun.

I seem to recall it was going to be a weekly event, but we've been a bit slack about it.

I feel I have the advantage however, as it's 19:45 here and I've started on my beer, so my comedy dial is turned up to max

reply to post by budski


Then I have little to worry about.

Originally posted by americandingbat
Have you considered going into politics Mr. Shock? With feel-good rhetoric like that, who needs positions?

Never...

I would have to get comfortable with smiling 20 hours out of the day and I sure wouldn't like the morons who buy into 'feel good rhetoric' as if it were holy writ...

Though, idealic as it is, I think it is accurate. Tactics and Strategies, as long as they are within the rules/guidelines, should be varied.

And everyone should keep in mind that Challenge Matches have the unique attribute of having negotiable rules; as long as consensus is reached between the two participants the rules of engagement are up to you guys. Tournaments are pretty much the only non-negotiable periods as far as rules go.

Edit to Add:

post by orange-light


Yes...the ten sentence rule for external sourcing is per post.

[edit on 5-12-2008 by MemoryShock]

reply to post by schrodingers dog


Oh I'm not sure about that at all

reply to post by schrodingers dog


why being worried?


the comedy debate is just what i need tonight!

but i am passive in it!

edit to add:

back to quoting:

so it would be entirely ok to built up a whole debate on rhethoric without any quoting?
or do i absolutly need sources to proof my thoughts?

(besides such debates i.g on organic food and similar)


[edit on 5-12-2008 by orange-light]

reply to post by orange-light


I was saving this for later, but here, just for you

reply to post by orange-light


I was just making fun of Budski, if this is as funny as he gets, I have little to worry about.

reply to post by budski


guten abend - good evening good evening good ev …

hillarious

*away cleaning my display*

reply to post by schrodingers dog


i am always glad to find people with humor

sorry if i am a bit slow tonight, forgive me please

besides the stress i am suffering of to much sugar - so i got a sugar-shock

reply to post by schrodingers dog


Hehe

I don't see too many comebacks

This one's for the militant christians

i just can.t resist

reply to post by orange-light


Welcome to the club

Originally posted by MemoryShock
Never...

I would have to get comfortable with smiling 20 hours out of the day and I sure wouldn't like the morons who buy into 'feel good rhetoric' as if it were holy writ...

You should run for local office, then. Local politicians don't have to media-plastic-smile all the time.

I bet you would find some interesting stories to tell.

PS: Hey how about posting yvids as links, not embedded video? Am I the only one who thinks they spam up the thread a little?

Originally posted by Ian McLean
You should run for local office, then. Local politicians don't have to media-plastic-smile all the time.

I bet you would find some interesting stories to tell.

Oh goodness...someone as 'fringe and liberal' as I would likely have a hard time getting re-elected (I would, of course pander to the middle ground to get elected the first time)...

PS: Hey how about posting yvids as links, not embedded video? Am I the only one who thinks they spam up the thread a little?

I second that. It gets a bit redundant after the fortieth Monty Python video...

I actually almost posted something to that effect but didn't want to be a big bad meanie...

reply to post by Heike


oh dear me heike

i am scared scared scared

@budski
thanks

edit:
to cut out video

sorry


asking again about quoting!

do i have to quote external sources to proof my thoughts? or can i just built up posts/debates on mere rethoric?



[edit on 5-12-2008 by orange-light]

reply to post by MemoryShock


reply to post by Ian McLean


Budski started it.