Originally posted by ybab hsur
reply to post by tyranny22
Bush was not a war president when he was elected either. In fact, if you'll allow your liberalism to be set aside for a moment, and remember his
presidency before 9/11, and even a few years after, was at record highs.
But nah, that didnt happen in liberal land. They dont keep written records there, its all spread by word of mouth and cave drawings.
Obama doesnt seem to be a war president, thats correct.
How many dictators, and how many terrorist leaders do you think will exploit that? How many terrorist attacks does this country have to endure
before people like YOU finally say "enough is enough, my heart no longer bleeds for terrorist criminals!!!!"
Obama may not be a man in the sense that he'll stand up for his family, his church, his loved ones, or even his own convictions, but atleast
he's black, right?
Any person who votes for Barack Obama is either racist, or trying to appease their own guilty conscience.
If you're the latter, i have two things to say:
1.) You probably use the racial slur for black people all the time
or
2.) If you dont do #1, then you have nothing to feel guilty for. So stop acting like it.
I counted your responses to people just since my post and there are THREE (the only three you've posted since mine) in which you call people liberal
or say something derogatory about liberals. I think I smell a troll.
For your record, I'm a conservative. If you had paid attention to anything I said in my original post, you would know this. But, I guess you were too
busy trolling, (i.e.: calling me a racist) to notice. Get a life. Seriously.
I guess you meant his Approval Rating was at record highs before he decided to point the finger at an innocent country and invade. I'm sure it was.
But, he's enjoyed being the most despised president in history since.
Liberal Land, huh? uummmm, OK.
About the terrorism - Let's take a look at the terrorist attacks on America that have occured in the past 20 years:
1993: Feb. 26, New York City: WTC - carried out by a former CIA operative.
1995: April 19, Oklahoma City: Federal Building - carried out by a former U.S. Army soldier
2000: Oct. 12, Aden, Yemen: carried out by extremist thought to have ties with Osama bin Landen or Al Qaeda
2001: Sept. 11, New York City, Arlington, Va., and Shanksville, Pa.: carried out by extremist thought to have ties with Osama bin Laden or Al Qaeda
Are we seeing a pattern here? It's well know that the CIA funded the mujahideen (which included bin Laden) that fought off the Soviet invasion of
Afghanistan. And there's been much speculation that bin Laden himself was a former CIA operative.
And we look at some of the events that have sparked wars in the past, such as the Gulf of Tonkin incident, which was TOTALLY fabricated by our own
government to draw us into Vietnam ... why would I "trust" the next terror attack would be the genuine article carried out by actual Islamic
Extremists?
You can call me liberal or racist if you want ... but it really doesn't help your case at all ... if anything it hurts your creditability and your
"conservative" views. Frankly, I shun any "conservative" who supports a liberal like McCain.
[edit on 2-6-2008 by tyranny22]