It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Was Hitler that bad?

page: 15
<< 12  13  14    16 >>

log in


posted on May, 20 2008 @ 03:28 PM
that is very impressive. i think you are right on almost every level actually, i loved your analysis of my question. we do indeed polarize our vision on this subject. To hitler he was right we were wrong, to usa we are right he was wrong. what people dont do when it comes to the holocaust and something like rwanda is say "hey the jews the tutsi they were both people" because we look at the holocaust with more of a disgust than any other genocide. Thats wrong a life is a life it doesnt matter if they are jewish, gay, black, nazi, american, its sad equally when an american dies as when a nazi dies. we are all people and we shouldnt say we will never forget then turn our heads away when rwanda happens or when sudan happens.

hitler started a world war and killed millions of people. stalin also killed millions of people. mao killed people, hu kills people, bush kills people. Its not that he started a world war that im upset we only hear about him, though that isnt really a valid point to make I think a british person posted in here and said when he was in school he learned about all of the bad guys not just hitler, im upset because by teaching the holocaust to death we are putting the lives lost in the holocaust over the lives lost to stalin, or to mao, or hu. its ridiculous to put one life over another.

Thats true but he was a nut to those who didnt agree with him. to those that loved him he was a genius.

YES! if we taught about the whole lot of bad guys there is then people would know "you know what he has alot of beliefs mao had i dont want to vote for him".

posted on May, 20 2008 @ 04:50 PM
Compared to Mao and Stalin, Hitler wasn't that bad, but when your talking about tyrants of this magnitude, comparisons are meaningless.

Stalin, Mao, Hitler, Pol Pot, Idi Amin and Jim Jones were all tyrants who mass-murdered innocent victims. They are all bad and we shouldn't waste too much time concerning ourselves with who was worse.

Evil is what it is.

posted on May, 20 2008 @ 07:23 PM

Originally posted by jbondo
The majority of the German people stood behind him and even helped to put Jews into work/death camps often turning Jews in or just plain doing street exterminations via stoning, etc...The extreme hatred frenzy he worked the German people into against the Jews was just unreal.

His war wasn't bad enough as he ordered death marches knowing he was going to be defeated. Trying to eliminate witnesses to his and "his people's atrocities was one of the final acts of his reign.

When you think of Genocide you think of Hilter. Just go to Germany now and ask around but don't be surprised if you end up in jail as the shame is still paramount on the minds of the German people.

I know Jews that have gone thru this. They tell me stories of running away as small children while planes flew overhead strafing them with gunfire. Starving in the middle of winter with no firewood, some even resorting to cannibalism to stay alive. Watching as their mothers are torn from them and then being sent to child labor camps.

Arguing over who is the worse mass murderer is not an argument anyone will win. In fact, it's not worth the argument as death, torture, pain and anguish are the only result.

Agreed.I might like to add that Hitler build the autobahn not with the citizens of germany in mind but for his military.He knew Germany was at risk of a two front war so made sure she had the network of highways and rail set up just so the military can move quickly form one front to another.In addition in the waning years of WW2 rail lines ,which were badly needed for the army, was mobilized to accelerate the Holocaust and given priority over army mobility.This is where the true evil of Hitler and the National socialist party show their true colors.

Judging from the hate websites on the internet,that ideology has survived to this day.The same year Hitler came to power 1933 ,did the holocaust begin with absurd laws targeting jews as they were seen at first as the reason for german defeat in WW1.Here we had a leader of a people who were supposedly well educated but were completely duped and tricked into a war and dictatorship.Hitler said that its a good thing that masses do not think!Theres a reason he said that.People of Germany were not thinking in 1933.They werent thinking when he scooped up slovakia or austria.And they bought the story of how the Poles attacked them first.

Then on his dying day he blamed germans for the loss of WW2.So a leader begins persecuting a culture based on conspiracy and lies,fools the general people with some conspiracies about jews dating back to Roman times,and starts a war to justify it all.What we got here is a leader not willing to accept responsibility for what hes done.An all to common occurance nowadays in our world.

So to answer the OP yes he was that bad and way worse.I will not let this rest and make sure each new generation knows about this particular dictator.

posted on May, 21 2008 @ 02:52 AM
Researching Hitlers view of "Germania" will show you alot of what his intentions were.

posted on May, 21 2008 @ 03:28 AM
Hitler had the right idea to rid the world of the lie of Christianity but he went about it totally the wrong way.

And yeah, i'm sure that statement is gonna outrage people but why don't you do some research on christianity being a lie created by the jews to control the non jewish before you stone me for my statement.

[edit on 5/21/2008 by Mad_Hatter]

posted on May, 22 2008 @ 11:00 PM
reply to post by Mad_Hatter

he wanted to rid the world of more than just christianity. and if were a choice of how he was to rid the world of christianity then i would rather have it the way he did it rather than a "brave new world" scenario where you have no clue that youre being controlled or need to fight back. With hitler everyone knew the danger.

posted on May, 26 2008 @ 10:37 PM
It was his duty to fulfill the prophecy, and by his actions, he fulfilled them. Without him Israel would have never existed.

posted on May, 28 2008 @ 10:38 AM
reply to post by Justice11

calm down friendo, i have said yes hitler was bad but there have been just as bad people to walk the earth. NEVER did i say "hey lets all forget about hitler".

Dont use his manipulation of the people to say he was evil. We are manipulated on a daily basis as well with news with REALITY TV! with everything we are being manipulated to pay no attention to the big issues. Its the truth! Turn on your news tonight o right now watch the news channel and tell me that at least 70% of the stories on there are non sense that doesnt deserve being called news.

Every government manipulates their people for a very good reason WE DONT THINK we listen and agree and we never think about whats really being said, like in our presidential debates how artfully the candidates can divert our attention from the question they were just asked and go off on their own little tangent.

So you cant say hitler was bad because Bush, Clinton, Obama all play off of our lazyness and our ignorance.

On a side note i was talking to one of my friends and she brought up a very good point, since it was our fault that Hitler did what he did thats why we dont let our nation forget about what we have done. All the other leaders around the world stalin being one wasnt under our control Hitler was.

posted on May, 28 2008 @ 11:02 AM
reply to post by Mad_Hatter

I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord.."

Right from "Mein Kampf". Hitler also attended to the Catholic church. You're so painfully ignorant it's disturbing.

posted on May, 28 2008 @ 11:08 AM
reply to post by LuLuLenin

But you forget that hitler after words burnt the bible.

posted on May, 28 2008 @ 11:10 AM
reply to post by caballero


posted on May, 31 2008 @ 12:06 PM
reply to post by LuLuLenin

Ok so here is the thing every tv documentry I have ever seen on Hitler has said that Hitler was against religion, BUT, you were correct (only half correct actually) Hitler did believe in the bibles God but very seldom did he go to church to practice the churches practice of religion. So he was very religious, but did not go to church.

Many American books, television documentaries, and Sunday sermons that preach of Hitler's "evil" have eliminated Hitler's god for their Christian audiences, but one only has to read from his own writings to appreciate that Hitler's God equals the same God of the Christian Bible.

So i was using some pretty ignorant information when i should have researched a little bit.

posted on Jun, 4 2008 @ 02:54 PM
reply to post by LuLuLenin

Thanks caballero. Thumbs gettin tired here.

posted on Jun, 4 2008 @ 06:17 PM
reply to post by Mad_Hatter

Ahaha sorry?

Now dont get me wrong when i said he believed in the bibles god he did but he was against the churches version of that god because many forms of christianity change the religion to fit their strange views (mormons). So it could be what you've said hatter because the churches god is different from the god that I have seen in the bible.

posted on Jun, 9 2008 @ 01:30 AM
reply to post by caballero

history of our nations were written by superpowers so you wont find any americans russians chinese as monsters

posted on Jun, 16 2008 @ 04:13 PM
of course he was.

we whent to war with hitler and germany.

and thus we used journalizm to mkake him stand out.

yes most people bang on him.

and thats because they dont know about the others.

an other popular war criminal is gangas kong. ( i think thats how u spell it.)

he was bad too.
hitlers army has done bad things.
it doesnt mean they are bad.

hitler brainwashed them to make it seem like it was a good thing to exterminate the obnormal.

in their eyes they were doing heroic deeds.

they soon learned they were doing evil when they saw the jewish screaming.

its sad. but it was done.

hitler was an insane man.
look at his life.
he was a corupt child because the jews treated him bad.

now look at a lunitic thats locked up.
he had a bad child hood too.

the jewish have pissed hitler off by taking his education.
and they acted better than him.

he wanted to get revenge.
so he used them as a scape goat.
he blamed them for poisioning his blood line.
and so on and so forth.

he soon believed that the jewish have poisioned his blood. and that they are evil.

thus he sperad it to his own people as if it was the truth.

so dont hate the nazis. dont hate germany.

hitler was a very ill man.

and hes not the only one.

posted on Aug, 13 2010 @ 04:55 AM
Don't forget Pol Pot leader of Cambodia who killed 1.7 to 2.5 million people, who were educated, who wore glasses, to make the country to go back to "year zero,"(send all workers back to fields) and lets not forget this all happened in the 70's and he basically got away with out.
As for Hitler, if I couldn't get a job, even with years of experience, a degree, and all jobs went to illegal immigrants(Or a minority "Jews" now called the "Rich"). Hitler promised how you would get your job back, or one that is in your field of study; I would vote for him. He just wanted to make a society,where everyone had decent job. Let's not forget how poor the economy was In Germany when he took over, and how he turned that around so fast. Also most Germans didn't agree with the Treaty of Versailles, which blamed Germany for WWI, and disallowed Germany from having its own army, which Hitler obviously objected and swore to overturn the Treaty which he did. Hitler also created a magnificent schooling system, which he did, also made the infrastructure in Germany as one of the best in the world So I think I might have voted for him then. then his sadistic thoughts came to be. But this is all about voitng him in as the Kaiser.

posted on Dec, 21 2010 @ 08:45 AM
reply to post by Melbourne_Militia

Another one of Hitler’s great accomplishments was German economic property under his rule. Since Germany had no colonies, their most pressing concern was to find a way to trade for raw materials. Hitler circumvented the normal trade methods, Hitler found countries to trade with. To make the deal more attractive for these countries, Hitler would subsidize the exports. They could also distribute the raw materials to whoever they wanted, but most importantly they could vary the value of the mark depending on the state of the global economy. This gave Hitler and the Nazis tight control over the German economy. Between 1933 and 1936Germany prospered and their standard of living rose to be higher than that of Britain

... okay and how did Hitler manage to do all this so called "trading" when there was a worldwide Jewish boycott on Germany since even before his "election"? I'm not going to go into the details of why the Jews wanted to politically control Germany and used the boycott to try to starve Germany in order to gain that control, but I'm suspicious of your whole argument. You don't seem to have any knowledge that the Jews were boycotting Germany and doing a good #ing job at it, along with using a website called propaganda2

and for the record:
Germany gave the world the opportunity to help emmigrate Jews away from Germany, i don't know before or after they started the Holocaust, but the Zionists as well as 30 something countries didn't want to help pay to save these Jews from the Holocaust. So, imo the Holocaust could have been reduced by huge proportions but the Zionists didn't want any of it and decided to betray their own.

posted on Oct, 1 2012 @ 10:05 AM
There are two sides to every story, and you've all only heard one side about Hitler. Check out this new film: "Adolf Hitler: The Greatest Story Never Told". It helps bring balance to the real Hitler rather than the extremes that are portrayed about him.


Part 1:

Also check out these comments by Mark Weber about a new book about Hitler:

"THE BEST FILM ABOUT HITLER ON YOUTUBE" The "standard" biographies of Adolf Hitler are inadequate and fundamentally flawed, says American historian Russell Stolfi in his remarkable new book 'Hitler: Beyond Evil and Tyranny' The Zionist controlled mass media, and even supposedly scholarly works, portray the German leader as a monstrous, criminal demagogue who was driven by irrational hatred and lust for power. In fact, contends Stolfi, Hitler was a prophetic, messianic and visionary figure, who should be understood and appreciated along with such towering personalities as Julius Caesar, Napoleon, Mohammed and Jesus. Stolfi's important book not only provides much-needed historical perspective. It is itself an expression of an inevitable trend toward a more valid and truthful understanding of an extraordinary historical figure. READ THE BOOK: Hitler: Beyond Evil and Tyranny by Stolfi:

edit on 1-10-2012 by WWu777 because: (no reason given)

posted on Oct, 1 2012 @ 10:07 AM
reply to post by caballero

Hitler was a puppet. The right question would be, "were the Swiss Banks and Bloodlines were that bad".

top topics

<< 12  13  14    16 >>

log in