No Hitler was not even as bad as Hitler. - sit and think about that for awhile.
When we create stories and labels we then can control what the masses focus on - and ironically take their attention off of our own hypocritical
All one has to do is yell a buzz word, "Hitler!" or "Holocaust!", and we immediately go into mass hypnosis and dont see the Hitlers and Holocaust
all around us. (i.e. Gaza - so I suppose killing innocent civilians is a casual pastime sport for some? All the while the leaders of Gaza are fat and
well dressed in another country, something suspicious here...seems they are slaughtering their own people?)
Nothing is ever as bad as the mental story or label that we throw out as the 'ultimate evil' or the 'ultimate good'.
These are all mental constructs which are illusion and do not do any one justice who wants to know truth - which is beyond the polarities. We must
remember there is a middle that connects north to south.
Unfortunately (well, lets not label, its is as it is...) people will not automatically get the gist of what it is that is being said here. They have
to continue down their own path till they figure it out for themselves. After all its their dime - they are the ones paying to play in this story
called life... in the big holographic game called the universe.
Once you begin to realize these basic concepts some things become clear - and the conspiracy side of things is one of the first things to become
The drama of the world really loses its grip relatively quickly, and life is no longer a struggle and you can now play with it. (life)
But until then you are stuck at polar ends...believing that somehow you are disconnected with the opposite side of the coin...making a story out of,
"me, & us" vs. "you & them".
"That which you resist persist" - Eckhart Tolle.
He also mentioned that in the current way that we go about doing things true change cannot happen. You see it all the time - that is the struggle of
us vs. them - and if a political party is seen as evil another one comes along to replace the evil with good, but ends up being 'twice the son of
hell' (as Jesus put it) than that which preceded them.
I know, for many of you its hard to fathom - but when you realize that the winner of any battle is always the 'good guy' - and even in battle each
side claims to those on their side that they are good - then you realize it is 'good' who writes history and suites it to its purposes.
Where would the world be today if Hitlers name was Adolf Smith.
So we would have the fearful term "Smith" instead of "Hitler".
Somehow Hitler goes over better for fear mongering than does a common name like "Smith". You realize most actors/actresses change their name (last
names) to something extra unordinary...same goes with Hitler it would seem. Its not even a common, uncommon name.
The Holocaust...it exist as long as any innocent is killed, and continues in countries throughout the world today.
But the Holocaust, like Hitler, has been turned into a one trick pony.
Interestingly enough not only Jews were murdered in WW II.
Here is a link to 10 questions by Rabbi Weissmandl concerning the zionist role in
It would appear that the zionist role in WWII was not as innocent as they would like us to believe, and indeed this would explain why they are so
quick in crying 'wolf' (anti-semite) to anyone and everything but themselves - who appear to be the true anti-semites. (Also the fact that they -
zionist - try to tie their label to Judaism so tightly as to look like one and the same.)
Anyway, they have yet (from what I have seen) come out against what this rabbi has said. Again, for obvious reasons...they hope most people just
ignore it - which seems to be the case.
The article well implies that the zionist hands are pretty bloody in regards to the deaths of the innocent Jews in WWII. Its an interesting read...and
its not from some anti-semite sight. (Written by a rabbi, published on a site by Jews who are not zionist.)
But then again, in the modern day in age, the zionist have pretty much succeeded and having the term zionist & Jew being viewed as one and the same.
What is a Jew? Its a lot more complicated then saying, "zionist".
Here is an excerpt from the article: And then you can keep pondering the Hitler question - or start to move beyond all the silly games that are being
played to see the clearer picture.
Ten Questions to the zionist. - Rabbi Michael Dov Weissmandl
IS IT TRUE that the answer of the Zionist leaders was negative, with the following comments:
a) ONLY Palestine would be considered as a destination for the deportees.
b) The European Jews must accede to suffering and death greater in measure than the other nations, in order that the victorious allies agree to a
"Jewish State" at the end of the war.
c) No ransom will be paid
IS IT TRUE that this response to the Gestapo's offer was made with the full knowledge that the alternative to this offer was the gas chamber.
IS IT TRUE that during the course of the negotiations mentioned above, Chaim Weitzman, the first "Jewish statesman" stated: "The most valuable part
of the Jewish nation is already in Palestine, and those Jews living outside Palestine are not too important". Weitzman's cohort, Greenbaum,
amplified this statement with the observation "One cow in Palestine is worth more than all the Jews in Europe".
The above was taken from the jews against zionism website - link above.
There is also the Neturei Karta website
(Also Jews against zionism) with info showing that indeed zionism is not
necessarily Jewish. (There are quite a few Christian Zionist.)
In the end, its time to go past all of these stories.
They tend to polarize.
Much like religion has the truth, but we are blinded by the dogma which pulls us down like mud sucking at our boots...its time to extract the light
and shake off the rest which no longer serves us.
Suffering, as Eastern (and even Western) thought has shown us, can lead to enlightenment...but how much more suffering do we need? How much more
division do we need until like a cancer we destroy ourselves?
The universe will move on... evolve...(look past the word and to where its pointing if the word bothers you.)
The question is, do we want to be part of the ride - a part of the growth? Or will we simply be a by product of the universe?
I believe M. Kaku put it this way: humanity has a 50/50 chance of either destroying itself or moving on to a type 1 civilization.
Personally, Im voting for the Type 1 civilization. - Hope to see you there.
[edit on 20-5-2008 by dAlen]