It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AztecSpiritual
I'm sorry but this is one of the most uneducated and irrelevant rants I've read in awhile.
After all, Hitler started a pretty damn big fight if you hadn't noticed.
The only reason that other fascist leaderships aren't brought up so often is because they aren't as aggressive in terms of international interests.
Originally posted by caballero
1) no im saying people have been the same as hitler. and if you are going to call my opinion ignorant back it up with something worth calling an opinion wrong.
2) and stalin killed 20 million of his own people but in my history books he was the ally of america in WWII and wanted more of germany than he desearved after WWII. nothing even mentioned of what kind of mass murderer he was.
3) international interests? how about sudan, who is the victim of international interests after all? i havent heard much about chinas heavy involvment with the exception of one magazine.
4) and what about the fact we didnt even try stopping hitler from his rise to power until he got too much power and we got scared? we put up sanction after sanction after sanction and watched him disobey those sanctions. the only reason it got as big as it did was because we did not act appropriatley to his rise to power.
[edit on 14-5-2008 by caballero]
Originally posted by bigbert81
reply to post by mlmijyd
Hitler would have surpassed them both had he not been stopped by force.
Originally posted by bigbert81
reply to post by mlmijyd
First, you may want to double check your numbers.
Secondly, yes, absolutely Hitler would have surpassed Stalin and Mao Tse Tung's numbers had he not been stopped.