It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by watchZEITGEISTnow
To WEEDWACKER
Seeing as you know it all, why do you think the FBI took the video footage of the service station (smoking gun) and other cameras in the area surely showing once and for all a plane did hit the pentacon?
I mean you do believe a plane hit the pentagon no? Would it not seem suspect to withold vital video proof of this happening?
Love to hear your answer, thankyou.
Love to ALL
watchZEITGEISTnow
[edit on 14-5-2008 by watchZEITGEISTnow]
Originally posted by watchZEITGEISTnow
reply to post by weedwhacker
The thing is you (like others) either run away, or change topic when this question is asked, or you then begin to insult. As in the numerous chemtrail threads you try to debunk, your cause, along with the others in that vein, is and will fail, as the truth 90% of people on this site believe.
watchZEITGEISTnow
Originally posted by watchZEITGEISTnow
reply to post by Pilgrum
That's a bold statement, by saying this you conclude 2 things:
1 Any footage shown will be not worth showing due to lack of detail(??)
2 If there is footage, we the public seeking the truth shouldn't even look at it because we already have made up our minds?
One thing about a free world is, WE have the right to SEEK TRUTH, those that oppose that, I guess are for a non-free world?
I ask you (as I ask every debunker) how would witholding vital visual evidence go AGAINST your case/s?
My question is why did they take it and NOT show it?