 |
reply posted on 7-5-2008 @ 08:48 PM by ChadAndrewATS
|
reply to post by LoneGunMan
Who doesn't laugh at Rupert Murdoch's "fair and balanced" news? This country has a lot of spiritualists, but it lacks a lot of support from
people, who could help, us patriots by fighting against Rupert Murdoch & his Fascist cronies:
14 signs of fascism-The USA turning into a fascist country?
 According to a college professor, Dr. Lawrence Britt (expert on Fascist Regimes & author of "Fascism Anyone?"), there are 14 Defining
Characteristics of Fascism:
1. Powerful & Continuing Nationalism.
2. Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights.
3. Identifying Enemies or Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause.
4. Supremacy of The Military.
5. Rampant Sexism.
6. Controlled Mass-Media.
7. Obsession with National Security.
8. Religion & Government Our Intertwined.
9. Corporate Power is Protected.
10. Labor Power is Suppressed.
11. Disdain for Intellectuals & The Arts.
12. Obsession with Crime & Punishment.
13. Rampant Cronyism & Corruption.
14. Fraudulent Elections.
Made by Eric Blumrich
www.ericblumrich.com...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-5-2008 @ 09:02 PM by AnonymousHippo
|
reply to post by freight tomsen
It's nice to know that you're not afraid to stand up against the people, who intentionally mislead the public, as FOX News does.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-5-2008 @ 09:41 PM by Rockpuck
|
  
That was ALMOST the fakest news story I have ever read.
Like a uber left liberal was day dreaming at his computer and thought he could spread a little Liberal propaganda.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-5-2008 @ 01:56 AM by SonicInfinity
|
I believe I've heard this story before somewhere, but I can't put my finger on it. Either way, without definitive proof, it really doesn't go
anywhere.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-5-2008 @ 03:13 AM by freight tomsen
|
 “I really look with commiseration over the great body of my fellow citizens who, reading newspapers, live and die in the belief that they have
known something of what has been passing in their times.” -Thomas Jefferson
Thomas Jefferson knew, as does any historian, that what passes as today’s News/Current Affairs, rarely remains unchanged when written/remembered as
tomorrow’s History. Newspapers present the official establishment position of each days’ events, but this is often not the truth, the whole truth
and nothing but the truth.
President Dwight Eisenhower’s speech-writer Wilson Bryan Key wrote a book called “The Age of Manipulation” all about his experience writing
presidential speeches:
 "For thirty-six sleepless hours, three writers turned out draft after draft, reviewed by a White House deputy press secretary who offered terse
comments like, 'Much too specific!' 'Ease up on factual references!' and 'Take it back and fuzz it up!' 'Fuzz it up,' we discovered
eventually, meant avoid all clear, factual statements about anything more specific than the time of day ... The speech was endlessly discussed for
likely audience reactions, belief and attitude reinforcements, and implied meanings ... Would anyone take the empty rhetoric seriously? The speech
read smoothly, but said absolutely nothing about anything. This was precisely what it was intended to say. During audience interviews after the
oration, most expressed satisfaction with the great man's words. 'Ike really gave it to them!' 'He has my vote!' 'I like the way he thinks!'
Great speech!'"
Newspaper articles are also very short, often not long enough to address the complexities involved in each issue. This problem is further exacerbated
with television “news,” where most coverage consists of 30 second sound-bytes. Furthermore, these articles and sound-bytes are often coming from
speeches and spokespeople in the “Spin Room.” They actually call it the spin room, where reporters “get the spin.” Spider’s webs and
skipping records are spun. Why is news being associated as such?
 “The news is a farce. As is the case with the financial institutions, which are concentrated in the hands of the few, long ago the media was
bought and paid for ...What you read and what you see on a daily basis is largely manufactured. You are being lied to each and every day.”
-Christopher Mark, “Grand Deception: The Theft of America and the World” (16-17)
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-5-2008 @ 03:34 AM by BlackOps719
|
Gotta admit that the comments are pretty darn funny
Especially the thing Hannity said about the tobacco juice etc. That is instant classic. I hope for their sake this isnt real because there are going
to be some seriously angry right wingers running around tomorrow. The thing is, I usually get the impression that this is how these people actually do
behave when not on camera.
I mean think about it. Bill Oreilly is a tv persona. He is paid to entertain Republicans, so he gives them what they want. He crams out some of the
most profainly stupid material at times you almost have to believe that he is just being over dramatic for the benefit of ratings. Who knows, in real
life he probably could care less about politics or the good folks at the Rep. party. Definately believe that Murdoch is only in it to make a buck off
of the lowest common denominator. He probably laughs in his sleep off of the billions that he is pocketing by keeping the dust stirred up.
As I said, not sure if this story is even true as of right now. But I will follow closely because this could get really ugly before it is over with.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-5-2008 @ 08:31 AM by Pjotr
|
reply to post by ChadAndrewATS
I think it is a very good analysis of their viewers. And it proofs they know their business as newsMAKERS. If you sell toys, you have to know what
kids are.
[edit on 8-5-2008 by Pjotr]
Mod Note: Big Quote – Please Review This Link.
[edit on 8-5-2008 by Gemwolf]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-5-2008 @ 09:59 AM by CaveatLector
|
This is clearly a hoax or just a piece of disinformation for several good reasons:
1: if there was an open mic, whose mic was it? Why no recording?
2: the writer obviously does not know how to fake real dialogue. No one speaks informally like the supposed quotes. They are clunky and clearly
constructed.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-5-2008 @ 10:02 AM by Rockpuck
|
reply to post by CaveatLector
Indeed.. as fake as it can get.
The fact that some even are considering it to be real is hilarious..
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-5-2008 @ 11:15 AM by Blaine91555
|
Also interesting that Hanity, a Born Again Christian and O'Reilly who has often stated it publicly; do not drink. We have another contender for the
Weekly World News Look-Alike Contest.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-5-2008 @ 05:42 PM by fooffstarr
|
I gotta agree with Rockpuck here. (Possibly the first time we've agreed on anything  )
As much as i hate FOX (I posted the Outfoxed doco on the forums a while back), the sources for this story are completely unreliable.
Until this can be supported by the audio itself or a source that isn't some random guy's blog than it's pretty much useless.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-5-2008 @ 06:05 PM by Choronzon
|
yes, as much as id like for this to be true, it seems that the source of this information comes from a personal blog:
assimilatedpress.blogspot.com...
hoax.....
[edit on 5/8/2008 by Choronzon]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-5-2008 @ 06:42 PM by Justice11
|
HA!Nothing i already didnt know....7 years ago!Much of what gets posted here on ATS is old news to me.Like 6months to almost a year old including all
the conspiracies.And dig deep enough and youll see that many conspiracies contradict each other or themselves and are hypocritical.
Nuff said.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-5-2008 @ 08:55 PM by spacebot
|
People in America have to understand what is going on. Both sides on the fence.
You a stationed a large portion of your army outside your borders and videos like this are evidence of a looming civil war inside your country.
Expect the possibility that in a decisive move of an international war campaign, a civil war uprising might occur devastating your armies moral to
continue, giving a chance to any waring opponents that your international politics and strategies have drown in the same war with you will jump at
every chance they get to conquer the battlefield leaving probably EU forces exposed and in actions of panic major devastating events may unfold both
in the EU and in your country. Both sides have to understand that your nations current strategy will bring no victory but instead lots of humans will
have to die.
Your strategy about making a growing list of enemies which as search about historical facts may show they are no idiots since they have been fighting
wars way longer than you did and since you gave them the chance to be prepared and await a final confrontation with you and your allies since decades,
will signal the most turbulent times in our earths history. We are a bout a big change and you people can decide if its going to be good or bad. It is
not just about drunk guys or advocates of nineleven being an inside job or not. Both sides HAVE TO think clearly else we all have to suffer and
some of us do not deserve it.
[edit on 8-5-2008 by spacebot]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-5-2008 @ 09:23 PM by want2believe
|
reply to I agree with you DR LOVE they all look at us that way, bacause most are no more than sheep, they control how we think and even how we
vote, look at how they made Ron Paul out to be the bad guy and would not allow him to really participate in the debates! Wake up America!
post by Dr Love
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-5-2008 @ 09:38 PM by jimbo999
|

Originally posted by Blaine91555
Also interesting that Hanity, a Born Again Christian and O'Reilly who has often stated it publicly; do not drink. We have another contender for the
Weekly World News Look-Alike Contest. 
Ahhh...showbiz is so sweet. Just because a celebrity says he's born-again or doesn't drink, doesn't mean diddley squat I'm afraid. If their PR
people figure looking like a Born-Again Tee-Totaller will help their careers - then that's what the act will be. Trust me, I've been in this biz all
my life  It doesn't mean anything. It's a ratings game - period.
J.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-5-2008 @ 09:40 PM by AnOldFriend
|
Hmm if this story is true then perhaps they were mocking those that say similar things about them and Fox News. I am sure that they are aware (being
who they are) that while in a public setting they could be subject to any form of recording at anytime, and even while drunk wouldn't say such
things, whether they thought it true or not, with out hints of sarcasm.
[edit on 8-5-2008 by AnOldFriend]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-5-2008 @ 09:51 PM by jimbo999
|
Originally posted by AnOldFriend
Hmm if this story is true then perhaps they were mocking those that say similar things about them and Fox News. I am sure that they are aware (being
who they are) that while in a public setting they could be subject to any form of recording at anytime, and even while drunk wouldn't say such
things, whether they thought it true or not, with out hints of sarcasm.
Then how do you explain George Bush's 'indiscretions' caught on various microphones around the world? Don't his handlers look after this kind of
thing for him? They're supposed to - but they can't predict everything
At these kind of shows, celebs are with their own kind, and feel they can let their hair down and knock back the free booze - and be very 'frank'
with each other. It happens all the time  I've been to these kind of events and seen it many times myself. I've also read many hillarious
sound-bites and interviews
with/about people I know personally that were - errmm...pure fiction basically.
J.
[edit on 8-5-2008 by AnOldFriend] 
[edit on 8-5-2008 by jimbo999]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-5-2008 @ 10:04 PM by AnOldFriend
|
Then how do you explain George Bush's 'indiscretions' caught on various microphones around the world? Don't his handlers look after this kind of
thing for him? They're supposed to - but they can't predict everything
At these kind of shows, celebs are with their own kind, and feel they can let their hair down and knock back the free booze - and be very 'frank'
with each other. It happens all the time I've been to these kind of events and seen it many times myself. I've also read many hillarious sound-bites
and interviews
with/about people I know personally that were - errmm...pure fiction basically.
J.

Perhaps your right and they were being serious I was just offering another logical explanation to an evidence free story.
Sure would be nice to hear this supposed tape.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-5-2008 @ 10:28 PM by HowlrunnerIV
|
reply to post by freight tomsen
While the investigation into the provinence of the original news story appears to prove it is unmitigated and unsubstantiatable (ugh!) crap, I have no
problem with people deservedly bashing Rupert.
If you really want to explore what "the rotten old bastard"'ll do for the paltry sum of thirty pieces of silver, check out Jack Schaffer's ongoing
personal crusade...
www.slate.com...
but the pay-off is here
www.slate.com...
enjoy...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |