It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by stompk
Augustus says Aurelius was a friend to the Christians.
Don't the Masons worship the Supreme Worshipful Master or something like that.
Originally posted by Neo Christian Mystic
OK, I don't know this person's entourage, but I know about the system of masters within the Mason system.
Mastering is important for progress and being a master of one's degree would mean that you've progressed beyond your former state. A grand master would be a person with the highest degree of knowledge and progression within his lodge,
and the worship master
or ritual master would be a master within his field.
But these are mere men and not gods, however they have reached a level of knowledge and wisdom which equals them to God and allows them to influence society like God does, only on a smaller scale.
To me, it sounds like he's referring to Jesus, and Peter, who later performed miracles, and drove out demons.
Originally posted by Roark
You've got it! You've made the connection!!
Originally posted by cutbothways
No, the Roman Catholics were the pharisees. They later attached themselves with Jesus, because they saw a way to make money.
Don't the Masons worship the Supreme Worshipful Master or something like that.
Originally posted by Masonic Light
The Pharisees were a school of Jewish theologians that existed during the time of Christ. They were *not* Roman Catholics. They were Jewish priests and scholars.
We do have ritual instructors who are indeed masters of ritual work.
Originally posted by Neo Christian Mystic
Actually, no. The Pharicees like the Sadduchees were infact political parties existing at the time of Christ.
The Pharisees were, depending on the time, a political party, a social movement, and a school of thought among Jews that flourished during the Second Temple Era
Originally posted by Neo Christian Mystic
Actually, no. The Pharicees like the Sadduchees were infact political parties existing at the time of Christ. But their law was the Torah with certain additions to the law which Paul refer to as the Yoke of the Covenant, stones added to the burden of the Law.
Originally posted by Neo Christian Mystic
These laws can be seen in certain Talmudian works. Among other things one of the laws was an extension of the Sabbath commandment. According to this law one could only walk a certain distance on the Sabbath. Curiously enough the distance was from the Temple to Mount Olives. Jesus walked this distance nearly every Sabbath where he preached and healed people etc. angering the politicans, priests and scribes.
Originally posted by Masonic Light
I used the term to refer to the "school of thought". But even if you define it as a political party attempting to influence the Sanhedrin, they're still not Roman Catholics.
Originally posted by JustMe74
Being Jewish, and having studied the Talmud, I find this to be an odd statement. I'd like specific examples from the Talmud, if you don't mind. And which Talmud are you referring to? Is this something in the Mishnah or elsewhere? When you're reading the Talmud, which translation are you using?
Originally posted by Neo Christian Mystic
From the Zohar to the later works,
Originally posted by Neo Christian Mystic
Talmud is basically a tradition of commentary on the Torah, right?
Originally posted by Neo Christian Mystic
Well when the scribes studied the Prophets and Scriptures they saw that the prophets added to the Law or kept stricter observance of the Law, this resulted in a series of reforms to the original reading of the Torah and it's 613 laws and commandments. It was my understanding that it was based on such commentaries from what became the Talmudian tradition that the Pharicees and similar groups fronted different laws.
Originally posted by Neo Christian Mystic
I haven't studied Talmud at all, I am more of a Bible thumper, but sooner or later I am buying the books. Trying to learn Hebrew and Greek, but progress is slow, still I'm nothing without a lexicon and a dictionary, I can't make sentances because I still haven't figured out of the gramatics, but soon enough I'll learn to read the whole Bible in it's "original" languages.