 |
|
Topic started on 9-4-2008 @ 09:37 AM by caspar2012
|
hey guys,
I was just wandering who is regarding as being the most powerful of these groups. Of course no one knows for sure but I was wandering who is thought
to have the most powerful members.
This list is not in any order at the moment I am just throwing some names out. Feel free to ad more and lets see who we think is the most powerful.
The Masons
Bilderburg
The Weavers
The Illuminati
The Sovereign Military Order of Malta
The debate is open people.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-4-2008 @ 09:54 AM by Crakeur
|
        
the one you don't know about.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-4-2008 @ 10:10 AM by Breifne
|
Hi Caspar,
I only joined ATS the same time as you, so I would be just as interested as to the 'whos who' of the X world.
I am currently looking into the Bilderburg but this appears, not to touch the levels of secrecy of the Illuminati. Apparently, the Illuminati were
created from the Masons in Baveria in 1776, although some say it has been around a lot longer. Here you will find a decent link to their (researched)
background that looks at the secret controllers over the millenium: ( www.conspiracyarchive.com...)
I suppose, all these groups are interlinked somehow with one common goal - control.
Happy hunting.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-4-2008 @ 10:14 AM by yeahright
|
I'm pretty sure it isn't The Weavers.
The Masons have no real power as a group, but there are some powerful members of the organization.
Bilderburg Group is more of a meeting of power brokers, so I don't think they have much "power" as a group either.
Illuminati? No don't get me started.
Sovereign Military order of Malta could probably hold their own against the Swiss Navy, but beyond that, nahh.
In retrospect, maybe it IS the Weavers. At least they get points for harmonics.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-4-2008 @ 02:39 PM by JustMe74
|
Originally posted by Crakeur
the one you don't know about.

I concur.
By the way, aren't 1 line responses a violation of the forum TOS?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-4-2008 @ 02:46 PM by RuneSpider
|
reply to post by Crakeur
Darn, you beat me to it. I was going to say, a known secret society looses much of it's power.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-4-2008 @ 06:52 PM by senrak
|
Originally posted by JustMe74
Originally posted by Crakeur
the one you don't know about.

I concur.
By the way, aren't 1 line responses a violation of the forum TOS?

LOL! I was going to point out the same thing. My initial thought was to say "We can't tell you. It's a secret!  " but thought I'd get
dinged for a one-line response.
These super-mods...ya' gotta watch 'em
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-4-2008 @ 07:06 PM by RUFFREADY
|
I don't know, but it would be "The US Government" organizations that gets that "black Budget money" to all the folks: like area 51 ( or whatever
places that builds weird stuff).
Probably if you study folks like "Richard Bruce "Dick" Cheney " and see who they hang with..you'd be on the right track.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-4-2008 @ 07:10 PM by Rockpuck
|
reply to post by senrak
don't worry brothers.. I already had that guy reported for his violation!
The most powerful secret society in the world is not the Free and Accepted Masons.. but actually an even MORE powerful organization known as the Free
and Accepted Carpenters.. not many know about these wood carving fellas because they infiltrated the Masons and use us as a front to blind what the
Carpenters really are!
Then there are the infamous Free and Accepted Pavers .. taking over the world one boulevard at a time.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-4-2008 @ 07:16 PM by yankeerose
|

I'd say the Vatican/Illuminati.
From there they branch out into the Mafia and Freemasons.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-4-2008 @ 07:28 PM by Illahee
|
This is a no brainer. All mentioned so far focus on the betterment of the individual and are the usual scapegoats.
The true raw evil power is the Skull and Bones and Scroll and Key societies.
Think on this. Who ran for the last election? Two known and admitted Skulls went head to head, and one is now in office. It don't get any more
powerful than owning the whole election. No matter the win, they win.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-4-2008 @ 08:04 PM by Masonic Light
|
Originally posted by Illahee
Think on this. Who ran for the last election? Two known and admitted Skulls went head to head, and one is now in office. It don't get any more
powerful than owning the whole election. No matter the win, they win. 
I have to disagree. Sure, both Bush and Kerry were Bonesmen, but they had vastly different ideas and policies. I don't see how any of it had anything
to do with a college frat.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-4-2008 @ 08:06 PM by Rilence
|
  
Probably the Knights who say Nii !!!
They certainly were most fearsome threatening to hit you with a herring unless you built them a shrubbery 
Peace
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-4-2008 @ 08:59 PM by AugustusMasonicus
|
 
Originally posted by Rilence
Probably the Knights who say Nii !!! 
Sorry to inform you, they are no longer the Knights Who Say Ni, they are now The Knights Who Say 'Ecky- ecky- ecky- ecky- pikang- zoop- boing-
goodem- zoo- owli- zhiv'.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-4-2008 @ 09:20 PM by psychedeliack
|
In my opinion, its the group that makes up the positive loving individuals who understand the occult, and how some are using it negatively. It is all
of US who know what the secret societies teach, and who use the information for the good rather than bad.
It is the group I mention because its the biggest one, and it cannot ever be stopped, and it is the only group the evil groups are worried about.
I guess you could call us the Illuminati, since illuminati only means enlightened. It does not mean evil. Some evil people have connected it with
evil due to correlations with the term NWO, and thinking thats a bad thing too. Its an inevitable thing is what it is, whether it end up being bad or
good is up to the people who live in the time of the transition.
They are trying to make the occult look bad, the occult they effectively use to trick you into smaller and smaller boxes of perception.
They bombard our psyche with material options laced with occult symbolism that carries whatever energy you intend for it to carry, it effects the non
occultist because they have not put their own intension's into the symbols.
and AudustusMasonicus, and Rilence, the Knights who say Ni!, thanks for that guys, a genuine laugh! That movie is the best
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-4-2008 @ 09:29 PM by Roland Deschain
|
Well I'm gonna have to say the illuminati if they do in fact exist. This is the group that is supposedly running the whole show right? The guys that
are going usher in the NWO? So if the illuminati does actually exist and they have the power to bring in a NWO and run the whole globe i think that
would make them the most powerful secret society. Maybe they don't call themselves 'illuminati' though. maybe thats just what we call them. maybe
they don't label themselves. i think if i was in an elite group that controlled the world i wouldn't give it a name. secrecy
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-4-2008 @ 09:44 PM by Illusionsaregrander
|
Originally posted by Masonic Light
I have to disagree. Sure, both Bush and Kerry were Bonesmen, but they had vastly different ideas and policies. I don't see how any of it had anything
to do with a college frat. 
They seem to, you mean. What someone says their ideas and policies are and what they actually implement when in office can be two very different
things. The little "crumbs" of difference that the parties throw us, promises of health care, tax reform, etc., seem to mask a very similar foreign
policy and a very similar predisposition to make laws that support the expansion of corporate rights and powers, and get rid of laws, deregulation,
etc., that constrict corporate rights and powers.
I personally havent forgotten all the Democrats who swore they would not have started the war in Iraq, nor supported the Patriot Act, and guess what
happened when they got control of the house? They renewed the Patriot act, and we have sent more soldiers to Iraq. Talk is cheap. I dont see that
big a difference at all in how things play out. From CBS news, regarding the Patriot Act,
www.cbsnews.com...
And from the New York Times a really enlightening article on how both parties have been sending in very Corporate friendly justices in for years
called "Supreme Court, Inc." by Jeffery Rosen.
www.nytimes.com...
I think we need to look past the rhetoric, and the "hot button" issues they toss our way knowing we will grab the bait and pay better attention to
the larger, underlying issues that are really driving our countries policies.
The Canadian memo regarding the conversation between Obama's senior economic advisor Austan Goolsbee and a Canadian government official can be read
here; the link to which is provided through ABC news,
abcnews.go.com...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-4-2008 @ 10:01 PM by Rilence
|
hehehehehehe 
I forgot about that...And my bad in my post...You had to chop down the tallest tree in the forest with a herring, not get hit by it...
Still funny tho
Peace
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-4-2008 @ 10:35 PM by exitestablishment
|
Originally posted by Masonic Light
I have to disagree. Sure, both Bush and Kerry were Bonesmen, but they had vastly different ideas and policies. I don't see how any of it had anything
to do with a college frat. 
I have to disagree with your assumption of both having vastly different ideas. They were almost photo copies of each other. If you want different,
Ron Paul I would say if vastly different from those guys. Their MO might of been different, but it seems that they always led to the same conclusion.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-4-2008 @ 12:54 AM by lazy1981
|
reply to post by Rockpuck
You know, there may be something to your theory. They do have an inverted square and compass as there emblem. Wow, who would have thought. 
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |