Originally posted by Buckjackson
reply to post by ADVISOR
Last Sept., I took a flight from San Francisco to Washington, DC.
While en route, I ordered a 'snack pack', cost me a whole $7.00
It contained a bunch of crackers and a can of tuna. The tuna came in a metal can, with a PULL OFF lid of heavy duty steel.
Having grown up amongst the Apaches and Navajos, I could have used that lid and a weapon to cut throats - even do a bit of scalping if I were so
inclined. (The TSA took my P-38 can opener)
I showed this to the chief steward(ess):
She laughed and said; "Relax, there were no hijackers on 9-11, just holograms".
So I got home and sent a couple of letters to the FBI: No response.
So I drive to the nearest office and have a FTF with a special agent.
He was totally non-plussed.... what no one cares that a passenger can obtain a sharp weapon while on a flight?
Being a retired cop with a few nickles (who doesn't have to work) I reviewed every single bit of video and statements concerning 9-11.
the stewardess was correct, there were no aircraft hitting buildings (or the ground) on 9-11.
We have now caused a lot pain to some primitive and nasty people, but there were no Arabs or Moslem's on those flights.
I hate to think of the karma which this nation will have to pay :^(
Pray for us all.
What airline were you on, anyway? And wow, a stewardess basically comes right out with one of the supposed 'hoax' scenarios like it was a fact. It
would indeed be interesting what the flight crew members says about 9-11 when nobody else is around. And it is interesting, to say the least, that
this 'theory' was tossed in the 'hoax' bin when it is really quite possible.
I've always speculated about the possibility of holograms being used. It's commonly accepted that the military has technology that is 50 years or so
ahead of what's available to the general public. That being the case, considering how holographic technology is improving even out here in the
civilian realm, I can easily imagine what capabilities are actually available at the military level.
So those mystery white jets circling around at all of the scenes... maybe those were actually projecting the images/noises of the jets to cover up the
approach and strike of the missiles. And maybe the technology isn't perfect yet, so you could see the plane from some angles but not others. so some
of the footage had to be edited to add the plane.
And certainly the holes left by the 'aircraft' in the WTC were not at all what you'd expect. The images show the plane slicing into the buildings as
neat as if they were slicing into butter. But if those wings and tail and all went thru the exterior of the buildings, shredding themselves as they
did so (since no lightweight aluminum or carbon fiber are going to slice thru harden steel like butter), it seems quite reasonable to think that 1)
there would be tons of debris falling down from the face of the hole and even after, shreds of plane dangling from the steel rebar. Instead they were
such neat holes, no trace of airplane shred to be seen, nor was any debris seen falling to the street below in the videos.
And it would explain why some of the witnesses of the pentagon 'plane' said they saw it roaring over the freeway but after it hit the pentagon, it
just disappeared. Well, I'm thinking a hologram of an airplane disintegrating completely on impact would be a bit of a stretch, not knowing what they
actually are capable of, but for sure, there wouldn't be any way to maintain the holographic image once people were walking thru it.
Oh and Shanksville.. sure would account for the different aircraft the witnesses reported seeing, or not seeing as the case may be. But the white jet
was there too, for sure. Most of the witnesses speak of it circling at least once, some say twice, before it left the area quickly.
And it isn't the average american having that karma to pay. It is those slimy PTB, and their flunkies who are trying to get full control of our
country's government for their own nefarious schemes and plans of world domination, we US citizens included. But they are still trying to break us &
get our guns away from us. That's their major hold up, from what I speculate. Just as Fleet Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto (Japan WWII) once noted, “You
cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass.” (I'd throw in quite a few hand guns nowadays too!
*lol*) TPTB know it too, so any blatant take-over attempt is pretty much out. Instead they are trying to be very careful and covert.
And while they will try to use our already existing infrastructure, the fact remains, our constitution gives us the right to throw off our government
if we feel our country has been covertly taken over by a group hostile to the constitution and it's redresses. Of course the Patriot Act (yah,
patriot--what a misnomer) makes that illegal now. *shakes head* But I believe, ultimately, that the Patriot act is secondary to the constitution and
the case can be made that the Constitution by rights is the primary document for use by we the people, not their artificial and anti-constitutional
"patriot act".
edit on 9-9-2011 by DragonriderGal because: (no reason given)