It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Why did NASA blot out this anomaly?

page: 1
8
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 14 2008 @ 03:57 PM
link   
Apologies if this was posted before; haven't seen it on the search buttons

I'm going to show you a youtube vid that seems to have been deliberately blotted out or rather photoshopped by Nasa.

As the question is always begged when it comes to photos/vids by Nasa:

"Why block out/hide something from the general mainstream, if there is NOTHING there in the first place, to view?"

I've followed through with the steps that the narrator of the vid told me. At first, I said to myself: "WOWWW!", then after, I was shaking my head (not at disbelief) but thinking of the audacity that was perpetrated and is still being perpetrated to this day.

Nasa is definately NOT place that denies ignorance.



~Ducky~




posted on Mar, 14 2008 @ 04:17 PM
link   
Interesting video. I think internos and MikeSingh have both looked at a lot of the work by this person. As FSMEs they are both whizzes with this stuff, so their insight will be invaluable.

Thanks for sharing.



posted on Mar, 14 2008 @ 04:18 PM
link   
wow. That is great. Nasa is the most ignorant space program on the planet.



posted on Mar, 14 2008 @ 04:23 PM
link   
reply to post by TheDuckster
 


A lot of it wasn't "blocked out" it was rather glitched out by poor data transmissions.



posted on Mar, 14 2008 @ 04:41 PM
link   
there is nothing to see here, move on..


just some more jpeg compression artifacts.



posted on Mar, 14 2008 @ 04:43 PM
link   
reply to post by NGC2736
 


You're very welcome!

I respect ALOT of Mike's works. Have been watching that fellow for ages.

~Ducky!



posted on Mar, 14 2008 @ 04:44 PM
link   
reply to post by chromatico
 


Glitched out?

Explain?

~Ducky~



posted on Mar, 14 2008 @ 04:47 PM
link   
reply to post by scarystuff
 


Oh...but I beg to differ.

Surely, you can add more comments and explain 'there's nothing to see here...move on'?

I value YOUR opinion. Please elaborate.

~Ducky~



posted on Mar, 14 2008 @ 04:50 PM
link   
reply to post by TheDuckster
 


Yeah, basically I'm saying I haven't seen an "airbrush effect" yet, merely compression artifacts.



posted on Mar, 14 2008 @ 04:53 PM
link   
reply to post by TheDuckster
 


The shapes just seem too symmetrically to be anything. I mean look at the picture it seems like these "anomalies" don’t have any dept , don’t know how to say it better, they look glued on . But then again they don’t look like compression artifacts either. It surely is a strange sight.

Here is the image with changed brightness and contrast


[edit on 14-3-2008 by matery]

[edit on 14-3-2008 by matery]

[edit on 14-3-2008 by matery]



posted on Mar, 14 2008 @ 05:06 PM
link   
Nothing to See!?????
okay, have a close look at these (so called) compression artifacts!




Hmmmm!

H



posted on Mar, 14 2008 @ 05:07 PM
link   
reply to post by Havalon
 


That looks so squarish and pixelated it's not even funny. Try again.



posted on Mar, 14 2008 @ 05:10 PM
link   
TheDuckster, thanks for sharing this one.

That's Hale crater, you can have a better look here
esamultimedia.esa.int...


I just would like to point out that :

1) This is NOT an image from NASA, but from ESA, MARS EXPRESS mission

2) This is not a photo but a CGI based on ESA photos.



You can find a cropped version of the photo here
img453.imageshack.us...

..and there's a long thread about this image
www.abovetopsecret.com...

[edit on 14/3/2008 by internos]



posted on Mar, 14 2008 @ 05:10 PM
link   
I can not see the video (I hate videos, why people think videos are more important than text or static images? they are usually just a waste of time) but if what is shown is the image from Hale crater that is used as an avatar by sean1david1ryan then it was the subject of a thread by Mikesingh, in which I tried (and probably failed, given the posts from most people
) to show that this is not a photo, it's a 3D rendering made on a computer using the height data from the stereo camera aboard Mars Express and mapping the real photo over the 3D model.

Doing it stretches the original image (that has less colours than is common) and the areas where the image was too stretched appear blocky.

And those images are from ESA, NASA had nothing to do with it.
How can I trust people's observation powers when they can not even read the title of the video they post?


Mikesingh's thread is Alien City On Mars? Check This Out!



posted on Mar, 14 2008 @ 05:16 PM
link   
reply to post by Havalon
 


Thank YOU very much Havalon!!! for posting this pic! (I really mean it!) Good pic!


If this isn't a structured man-made landscape, then will somebody PLEASE tell me what is artificial?

Listen folks... and listen dearly.

I don't care what the hell you've been 'privy' to, in this last while, but it's about FREAKIN time, we started giving our visual senses some credence!

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!

How much MORE disinformation can we contend with from Nasa?

~Ducky~



posted on Mar, 14 2008 @ 05:17 PM
link   
The book "Dark Mission" by R.Hoagland and Mike Bara talks about this stuff in great detail.I find this kind of stuff very fascinating.

There is much to see here,good post!


Edit:Wrong title to book.oops!

[edit on 14-3-2008 by crowpruitt]



posted on Mar, 14 2008 @ 05:20 PM
link   
Don't remember who on ATS posted this, can't give credit,

but this person claims to have hacked into NASA during the modem era when they had almost NO network security. He saw that they were actively doctoring photos to hide E.T. spacecraft orbiting our atmospheres.




posted on Mar, 14 2008 @ 05:22 PM
link   
reply to post by crowpruitt
 


I give more credence to Richard Hogland than to Nasa.

Good stuffs Crow


~Ducky~



posted on Mar, 14 2008 @ 05:27 PM
link   
The time has come folks

We need to make a stand.

Enough is friggin enough.

What I've shown you, is only a small drop in the bucket.

Time to spread the word.

Bout time.

~Ducky~



posted on Mar, 14 2008 @ 05:30 PM
link   
TheDuckster

Why don't you stop a little and read Interno's post and my own?

That image was not from NASA, that image is from ESA.

Try at least to accuse the right organisation.



new topics

top topics



 
8
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join