Why is America so Backwards When it Comes to Sex?

Originally posted by BlackJackal
Alright guys and Gals I am going to talk mature for a moment so just let me have my piece before we go back to giggling like school girls again.

How many consenting adults here on this board watch porn or have watched porn? I am willing to bet that the number is close to 100%.

Now why did I ask that? Because are any of you scared by watching porn? Can you not live with yourself now that you have watched porn? Of Course not, you even probably liked it and you could have watched it while you were with your partner for a little excitement.

Sex is not a bad thing it is only portrayed as such. Porn is not a bad thing if it is used for what it is meant for and that is for Entertainment of Adults. Now as far as kids go I know that since I was 13 I aspired to get a hold of Porn. I actually can remeber looking at it as far back as 7 years old (even though I did get my but tore up for it and I am not scarred by it.

) and it did not turn me into a Child molestor or rapist.

I really don't have a problem with bare breasts on TV because one of the first sites that my kids saw was their moms bare breast. As for full fledged porn I think that it should be kept where it is right now. Soft Porn I think should be available after 11:00 pm and can be aired by anyone.

Like I said before its not the TV that makes your kid bad its the parent.

Now you can go back to acting like kiddies.

That's kinda how it is in the UK, after thw 9pm watershed you can have naked men and women.
Hell you can have "scenes of a sexual nature" as long as they aren't hardcore.
You can't show an erect penis though, which I guess is how they get around it.

SeekerOf: Are you people mad or something because you didn't get the opportunity to see JJ breast or the streakers bum?!?!?

I don't even get the superbowl in australia but representing most Americans yes I am mad that it was censored out. How can the government proclaim propaganda of being a free country when it hides truths and hides footage away from its people which it has captured using its own technology??? The only people who the supernbowl should be censored for is the biblical Adam and Eve as God forbid it. Also, if every American went straight to a physical hell if they sinned sexually and watched naked people then fine, but in a 21st century world and government which has pushed homosexuality and other ridiculous concepts upon the world, they don't even attempt to uncensor a naked body? Whilst couples in the US are engaging in numerous grievous sexual fantasies involving whips, chains and God knows. Even hardcore pornography is a daily routine for most couples. So why can't the level below softcore (naked images) be allowed on TV?? It's frigging ridiculous!!

There should be channels that are just G rated for those that choose them, and there should be channels that are rated X for those that choose them. Nowadays there are enough channels foor everyone to get there wish.

Myself I like Porn

I like porn myself as well and don't see anyhthing wrong with it. Critics like to say that it hurts society but I have to disagree, If used for what it is ment for (Entertainment) then there is no problem at all.

I also see porn as entertainment only. I remember soft core porn, like Emmanuel, being played on late night TV in Germany.

No one cares if there is porn (ok, well some do but they outside of this discussion).

The point is, is that some people CHOOSE to not allow their children to see that kind of thing.

Cable or satalite is one thing, but public television is another. If people do not want it, then they have the right to not have to see it.

See these things should be a personal choice. We should see that it is.

The point is, is that some people CHOOSE to not allow their children to see that kind of thing.

And there should be channels for them that do not allow anything but G-rated entertainment.

SEX has become such a "dirty" word because the act of SEX itsself has become a dirty thing.

sex is a spiritual bond its not a freckin pleausre ride. its themost sacred thing you can share. i know that sounds like a bunch of virgin bull, but hell, who wouldnt want to make love under the stars in a graveyard or on a canvas covered in paint. im atually planning on one day making a painting on which i cover it in paint and just love someone with all the clothes on and such. then, taking those clothes off and nailing them to the top of the canvas. its nothing DIRTY or SEXUAL. its combining love and art in the highest way possible.


its raunchy, its nasty, its dirty, its forbidden. ya wanna know why? because telling someone you love them isnt done by MAKING love, its by buying a diamond necklace, giving them chocolate, buying them a car, sending them to college, paying for their wedding, giving them a house, blah blah blah. i heard a commercial saying "give the fit of love" and "show someone you truly care" by doing what?!?! BUYING them a $500 dollar necklace? so i guess the people living their dreams, the starving, but never speechless, artists dont love anyone, huh? this is stupid.

you cannot buy love. and love cant buy you anything.

but you can make it.

and make it well.

quit having SEX, quit F****ING (i knew itd get censored, sorry guys), quit SCREWING

MAKE LOVE

give love to everyone, get love from everyone, but MAKE love with only one, or else youll be like wal mart, putting up shop all over the country.

OK, I was only 8 or 9 when the Auperbowl event happened. My dad didn't give a rat's a** about it, I guess. I didn't get my eyes covered or anything. And when "Justin revealed the boob", I didn't give a rat's a** either. So, when I was young, still am, I didn't give a rat's a**. So, great point, ma cherie.