It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Hanslune
Why do you stick up for Hawass, Hanslune?
Someone has too! I understand what he is trying to do and applaude his efforts. `
In an even more bizarre twist to the tale, two months later the man responsible for sacking Dr Hawass at the time of the discovery of the slab, Dr Mohammed Ibrahim Bakr, was himself dismissed. But unlike Dr Hawass, he did not go quietly. In an interview with Egypt's daily newspaper Al-Ahram, Dr Bakr said he had been brought down by an official "mafia" whose aim was to impede the archaeological work for their own purposes. He also claimed that the Giza Plateau had suffered widespread thefts of antiquities and financial malpractice's. "I wanted these practices reported to the prosecution authorities but my request was refused"
Originally posted by Hanslune
There is not one single piece of evidence for aliens or advanced humans doing the work for them.
If that official Disclosure eventually take place, as expected between now and some 15 years or so, would that not change your opinion dramatically about the who build the Giza pyramid discussion and some more archaeological mysteries?
Someone has too! I understand what he is trying to do and applaude his efforts. However he is a media hound and a bit of schmuck but then so many people are. But his professional stands I can agree with.
Because all the evidence gathered in the last two-hundred years all points to the Egyptians doing it all. There is not one single piece of evidence for aliens or advanced humans doing the work for them.
Besides finding some evidence to support the idea that someone else did it you then have to discredit/disprove all the evidence that Egyptians did do it. That might be tough. You have a better chance in trying to prove the Germans weren't actually in WWI
You want a short answers for a massive question? See the answer above.
Originally posted by Photoneffect
Please, as a scholar, answer me these questions!
Originally posted by Hanslune
Answered but I assume you won't like them.
Originally posted by Hanslune
Lets use an analogy;
In those 1,000 bullet points we have 975 that are clear cut with little or no disagreement on what they mean or don't mean.
The next twenty four are a puzzle, people disagree as to what they are, how they relate, how they were made, whether they are Egyptian or what.
So MS Egyptologists taken the 975 items, digest them and say - this is the frame work of Egyptian civiilization.
Fringe takes the 24 items and the "1" and say no this is the frame work.
So tell me what you find uncompelling about the present data? What pray tell is your "one"?
Originally posted by Hanslune
Howdy Proton
I think you misunderstand the example. the "twenty-four" cannot "blow away" the other data - that data never goes away. That is a common fringe misconception (and why I use that analogy). The fringe belief is that if they can find one anomaly then all the other data ceases to exist. It doesn't, you have to explain/place all the data in your theory.
C-14 is factual, if you challenge that you challenge the basics of physics.
Lets try this, give me three key things that you believe disprove the conventional view of Egyptian culture or civilization (This is a long thread and I don't recall everything you've written). However if your argument is solely from personal disbelief in 'x' and not factual/evidence based. I'm not sure I can help you.
Originally posted by Hanslune
Zahi
From a point partway along the descending passage, a second passage leads upward to a horizontal passage which leads in turn to a second chamber, misnamed the Queen’s Chamber in fact, it was certainly not for any of Khufu’s queens, who had their own small pyramids.
to a third chamber, the “King’s Chamber”, where the granite sarcophagus of Khufu was found, empty.
Scholarly discussion about the building sequence and purpose of these corridors and chambers is ongoing: many Egyptologists believe that the three chambers represent three changes in the interior plan, reflecting changes in Khufu’s cult,but others believe that all three chambers were part of the original plan.
The presence of these doors in the Great Pyramid raises many questions. One idea is that the doors are challenges that the king must face during his journey to the afterlife. It is written in the Pyramid Texts that the king will face bolts before he travels; perhaps this is a reference to the doors’ copper handles. Yet if this is true, why is Khufu’s pyramid the only one with such doors?
Also, why are there no doors in the shafts of the third chamber? Logically, they should be where the king’s body was buried.
It is possible that these doors are evidence that Khufu’s actual burial chamber might be hidden somewhere inside of his pyramid. An ancient story from the Westcar Papyrus tells of how Khufu searched for the secret documents of the god Thoth in order to design the chambers of his pyramid; we are still trying to understand the complex he and his architects left behind.
Originally posted by diablomonic
reply to post by Hanslune
actually no, that sounds fairly conclusive...
ah well. guess thats it for that one. (unless we come up with more accurate GPR methods or something, or someone comes out to say they were lying)
Originally posted by jbmitch
reply to post by Harte
2 years ago this same info appeared right here at ATS, yet here we are having to rehash it.
Count on it. It won't be three weeks before somebody else makes the claim that Hawass is keeping us from finding the Atlantean library under the Sphinx.
Where would we be if quit asking questions,, challeneging accepted paradigms,,, Og has fire!...
My question ,,is so where did the Sumerians get their technology,, and that leads us back to Green men with fangs and scales
Why are there conspiracy theories,, we know our governments lie to the public to avoid disclosure.
The Egypyian government is no different, whether the Great HAll of Records is ever found who can say
I dont believe the findings in the post presented by Hanslume concerning the exploration under the Sphinx paws is accurate, discoveries have been made and with held,,I'm sure that the piece of that wood found in the Giza pryamid has been tested and the results known by a select few.
Egypt would have a lot to loose if it was made clear that native Egyptians were not the designers,,, construction engineers of the Giza pryamid, it is unique,,with a 52 o Angle slope to its sides..
I remember the Glider that was first presented by Van Dankien I believe and reproduced in some later periodicals was that ever debunked, sure didnt belong in a pryamid
along with the siloutte of a sykorski Blackhawk helicopter (there is nothing in nature that remotely resembles that side shot,, not to mention what appears to be a sub,, and possible a disc shaped UFO.
sphinx water erosion (I think you tentatively agreed with that one in one of these threads) (plus the temple? associated with it, similar thing if I remember right)
GP not having hieroglyphs through it like other Egyptian sites (plus the rest of the weird things about it previously mentioned and discussed)
"pyramids" all round the world. No they are mostly not true pyramids. Yes they seem to be based on the same Idea/copying/influenced by each other. You will probably say this is coincidence, I don't believe so.
To write a popular alternative book on the pyramids of Egypt ideally requires three essential qualities:
1. a total disdain for Egyptologists;
2. a passing knowledge of the subject concerned; and
3. an alternative theory that verges on the incredible.