Keith Laney 'Ferrets" out a Rat on Mars, page 2


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times


reply posted on 24-1-2008 @ 06:21 PM by zorgon
Originally posted by DogHead
Yes. It's a way to farm responses in a thread he knows will attract the rational people, who will jump on this nonsense like a weightwatcher on a Twinkie.

Are there are any COLOR pictures showing this rat or others like it???


Ah well I see the Lemmings have all gathered...

First of all the "Rat" is Keith Laney's discovery....

And if anyone had bothered to actually study the page he created on it you might get more out of it... I know this is too much to expect but hey

Now correct me if I am wrong... but I understood Keith was a respected researcher... and HAS worked for NASA cataloging the pictures and as a result has a vault full of really great images

On the
Pathfinder or Ratfinder page Keith makes this comment...


The key to evidencing that there are living creatures in the images from Mars
would be to find two different views of the same area showing movement.


What he is talking about is that he has a second view of the same rock and the "rat" is now gone...

Here is his animation...



Now I took the time to detail this a little, and here are the results...











So whether you like it or not... its an interesting find...

And to comments like the brilliant Mr Penny trying to be funny about the spelling of Bullitt... well comments like that rank with the best that youtube posters have to offer... perhaps you would be happier over there , because from now on posts like that merely get my iggy finger itching




reply posted on 24-1-2008 @ 07:32 PM by goosdawg
reply to post by zorgon



Cool!

Thanks for the direct link!

So the rat-thing scarfed down the White Castle burger and split!!

Mmmmm.....White Castle!

I'm gonna go eat dinner!


reply posted on 24-1-2008 @ 09:18 PM by DogHead
reply to post by zorgon



The "rat" is a side effect of a changing angle. To be relevant as sign of movement, would it not be better to compare two pictures from the same angle? Too logical?

From the highly acclaimed site you put so much store in:
On the right below is the same rock from a different time and point of view.


"different time and point of view"

The pictures are indeed signs of movement on the martian surface. The movement of course, of the human-made probe vehicle.

*sigh*

Meanwhile genuine anomalies of the surface exploration get ignored in favour of utterly insipid trash like this.

Remind me, who's supposed to be the lemming around here? Or to use another Monty Python word... Learology is just so much... SPAM.


reply posted on 24-1-2008 @ 10:55 PM by NGC2736
reply to post by zorgon



Damn, zorgon, I miss a few days on the board and I come back finding you being tarred and feathered.

Be so kind as to show how both of these are the same viewpoint, that'll put things right, 'cause I know you didn't let that slip by you.

I really want to believe that a rat got aboard before liftoff, breathed from a small hole he had chewed in the line going to one of the attitude jets so he could last for the trip, and then debarked the rover for some Martian sunshine. That would be such a telling adventure in so many ways. (And would explain why his fur looks so, well...ratty.)

Seriously, does your man have anything to say about this whole viewpoint thing?


reply posted on 24-1-2008 @ 11:20 PM by bigfatfurrytexan
Posted this in the wrong thread...moving it here:

Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by internos
Naa Ron not talking about you nor John, come on


I didn't say a word

What do you think of the Martian Rat ?

www.abovetopsecret.com...


One thing we must keep in mind: life will likely follow the same basic shapes that we are accustomed to (due to the nature of fractal geometry, which is a key secret of sacred math/geometry). If we see images of life, however, they will likely have superficial differences that can make them very hard to discern. Consider, for example, the terrain of Mars.

there are lots of boulders/rocks. There is plenty of water, trapped within the soil. There are higher levels of radiation. The temperature differences are somewhat erratic (even being a balmy 80+ during the summer months, localized). Gravitational effect is reduced.

So, what sort of life would one expect? Well...something subterranean most likely. Something that could possibly show its head occassionally for food or sunlight (or some other unknown reason). Something that could camoflauge against the dirt, "blueberries", and rocks. This would mean they would be something rock looking (think "rock fish" on land), or something bumpy and bluish, etc.

If you think about it from this angle, possibly new characteristics seem relevant. I think that the rat looks a lot like a rock. I mean, it is EXTREMELY rock looking. But i think that its rock like appearance doesn't mean a whole lot when i see bugs that look like small branches, or tree bark.

One would also wonder what the iron rich environment does to the biology of such creatures?

Keith may be wrong, but the concepts is prompts you to consider are a dose of good medicine, for sure.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



New Crop Circle Hackpen Hill Cube
  Posted 16 days ago with 92 member flags
Get ready to find yourself in a whirlwind of other worldly activity
  Posted 17 days ago with 50 member flags
Crop Circles Explained - Hidden Messages From Aliens & ET\'s ?
  Posted 13 days ago with 24 member flags
Man Made Ancient Pyramids Found on Antarctica???
  Posted 9 days ago with 23 member flags
The Flat Earth theory, With Interviews from believers
  Posted 1 days ago with 22 member flags
James Cameron the revealer & programmer?
  Posted 10 days ago with 9 member flags
Secrets Revealed 2
  Posted 16 days ago with 8 member flags
Mars: The Old Earth?
  Posted 10 days ago with 8 member flags