Remote view this!, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times


reply posted on 22-1-2008 @ 08:10 PM by Brock Gel
reply to post by OSSkyWatcher


Aren't you going to try? What are your impressions? None of us are real psycics or trained remote viewers as far as I can tell but maybe if you compare some responses to the current photo with some responses to the previous photo you might learn something about how your own abilities work. You don't have to sit in the lotus position meditating on it for a week, you can just take a guess if you want. You might even find that the post you just put up here right now has a lot to do with the photo in a way that only you and your own symbolic internal language could possibly understand! Give it a shot.



reply posted on 22-1-2008 @ 11:02 PM by OSSkyWatcher
Originally posted by Brock Gel
reply to post by OSSkyWatcher


Aren't you going to try? What are your impressions? None of us are real psycics or trained remote viewers as far as I can tell but maybe if you compare some responses to the current photo with some responses to the previous photo you might learn something about how your own abilities work. You don't have to sit in the lotus position meditating on it for a week, you can just take a guess if you want. You might even find that the post you just put up here right now has a lot to do with the photo in a way that only you and your own symbolic internal language could possibly understand! Give it a shot.


i can understand a game but isn't that what belowtopsecret is for? and if it's a game why are people all "tree/EIFFEL TOWER same thing" not even close if it's a game why even say you were close, it's like saying the score when you aren't supposed to be keeping score in a pick up basketball game

i'm not going to try because you are telling me some numbers, how i could ever possibly begin to imagine where that envelope sits to try and see inside of it, what i will do is think and what will come to me is what ever my mind thinks of when i think of the numbers/letters on the envelope it's not remote viewing it's probably an agents test

you want to see what people think when they think about those numbers/letters



[edit on 22-1-2008 by OSSkyWatcher]


reply posted on 22-1-2008 @ 11:17 PM by Brock Gel
reply to post by OSSkyWatcher


Thanks for wasting our time telling us that you're not contributing to the thread, but I guess you wouldn't be taking such effort to post something contrary if you weren't a little bit curious, like I was once.

Originally posted by OSSkyWatcher
i'm not going to try because you are telling me some numbers, how i could ever possibly begin to imagine where that envelope sits to try and see inside of it, what i will do is think and what will come to me is what ever my mind thinks of when i think of the numbers/letters on the envelope it's not remote viewing it's probably an agents test
[edit on 22-1-2008 by OSSkyWatcher]


No it's not remote viewing, but it's a blind target, set up with honest intentions, for people who honestly would like to give something like this a shot. From what I understand about it, the meaningless numbers are completely meaningless and are the only way "in" to what you might see but don't say anything in and of themselves.

They're just random numbers on the envelope holding the target. The more blind and impossible to "view" the better. You're not looking for anything with your eyes, right, you're looking through your eyes not with them as Blake wrote.

I would love to see a deeper discussion about the possibilities of remote viewing, people's experiences with it, what makes it different than other alternative means of getting information, what is similar, what works, what doesn't, what sorts of targets are worthwhile, what ones are a waste of time. I figured if there are any open minded people out there they might possibly be here, on Skunk Works.

You could do so much with RV, you don't even need an image (even though these last two targets have been images, since that's just the way I decided to do it). I could have just as easily written down "The Next President of the United States" of "A view on the surface of Venus" and to your mind, at least so I've been told, it's just the same as an image.

So if I write "The next President of the United States" and somebody draws a picture of a tall dapper man with dark skin and thinks maybe it's an actor they recognize, I would say that they're close to the target (assuming Obama wins the election), do you see what I mean? Even though I didn't put a photo of somebody there, the mind's eye would pick out images and symbols, not the actual photo.

So if there's a photo in an envelope in a city far away of the Eiffel Tower and somebody Remote Views it, and ventures a guess like "I see a tall tree, I smell metal, I see a child holding its parent's hand, it looks like a spider" well that's much closer to the symbolic mark compared to "I see a dry desert, I taste ocean air, I see a turtle", right?

Okay a nude Bea Arthur is a real stretch to link to the Eiffel Tower, but hey I'm an optimist and never pretended to be objective, I think you have way more latent ability for this sort of thing than you or I realize.

It's not a matter of trying very hard with your brain to see something, the harder you strain the harder it would be to see anything at all, you have to be open minded and relaxed or you will scare away the little subtle feelings. I probably wouldn't be very good at it either at first. Fortunately for me, I'm just the guy stuffing the envelope not putting his neck on the line and venturing a guess.

I think DogHead is brilliantly on the right road, posting the first thing that jumped into the mind, sneaking up on the subconscious mind before it can withdraw from all the attention. Certainly this is more than simply a game, I think it's a very good starting point for discussion.

I suggest you take a guess and keep it to yourself if you're more comfortable doing that, but do check in for the answer to see how close you came, who knows you might have the chops to be the next Ingo Swann and not even know it?

[edit on 22-1-2008 by Brock Gel]


reply posted on 23-1-2008 @ 03:25 AM by DogHead
Originally posted by Brock Gel
reply to post by OSSkyWatcher


Aren't you going to try? What are your impressions? None of us are real psycics or trained remote viewers


Embarassingly enough I am I guess a trained remote viewer... AF psych tests at university and then intermittently from then on whenever it was the fad in the service. How embarassingly bad at it am I? I'm no Ingo Swann that's for damned sure.


reply posted on 26-1-2008 @ 10:20 AM by Extralien
reply to post by ItsHumanNature


Your girlfriend could very well be right.

your assumption that it's the mars picture with the 'bigfoot' in it is a very good idea.

I hope you're both proved right
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^




Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Official Maine Caucus Results Thread!!
  2012 US Elections, Posted 6 hours ago, 74 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 17 hours ago, 69 replies