It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by IAF101
I cant say that I have "studied" his voting record.
Originally posted by IAF101
I dont care to study him with the reverence you assign him because he hasnt captured my attention
Originally posted by IAF101
and with his supporters on this site's rationalizing his affiliations with hate groups
Originally posted by IAF101
Do you have any evidence that there have indeed been no other donations by groups like Storm Front or the like?
Originally posted by IAF101
he has done nothing to distance himself from them. And for not doing so I find him guilty of association.
Originally posted by IAF101
Originally posted by redmage
Again, this clearly shows that you havn't looked into his voting record at all. Really, if you are of voting age, you owe it to yourself to actually research all of the candidates before jumping to conclusions regarding any of them.
What I choose to look up or not is my wish NOT yours. I can vote for Adolf Hitler if he was running.
Paul defends asking for special projects
WASHINGTON - Republican presidential hopeful Ron Paul on Sunday defended his efforts in Congress to bring home money to his Texas district, despite his long-held aversion to big government
"I've never voted for an earmark in my life," the Texas congressman said under questioning on NBC's "Meet the Press" about reports that he has requested hundreds of millions of dollars for special projects in his home district.
news.yahoo.com...
However, do I know this for certain? No, nor am I going to waste all that time reading throught all the texts of his non voting to see what was there. it would be a waste of my time and would any of the Paul supporters really care or accept it if anything was found anyway?
Originally posted by Navieko
The question is, would any Anti Ron Paul supporters really care if nothing was found anyway? Would it change your views about Ron Paul? Well then theres your answer. If it's not 'big enough' a problem to change your views, why should it be for us? There are much more important issues at hand.
[edit on 23/12/07 by Navieko]
Originally posted by jsobecky
So, if a news item made an RP supporter drop his support, would that make you change your mind?
Originally posted by twitchy
Originally posted by omnicron
I'm waiting to see if he returns the checks he has been sent by neo-nazis, he seems to be quite popular with them.
Hey by the way, was it one of these groups?
BUSTED! SO-CALLED WHITE SUPREMACIST GROUP EXPOSED AS ISRAELI PROPAGANDA OPERATION!
Knowing Ron's stance on the Federal Reserve, this could be interesting...
Originally posted by Navieko
The money is already there waiting to be alloted and his district should not get ignored by money that essentially is already spent and will be spent otherwise. He still votes against the BILL if it is unconstitutional.
www.nyt imes.com
New Orleans, June 13 (UPI) - The Federal authorities said today that John Connally, former Governor of Texas, and Representative Ron Paul, Republican of Texas, had no connection with a plot to overthrow the government of a Caribbean island, despite a lawyer's request that they be subpoenaed for the Federal District Court trial of three alleged mercenaries.
Originally posted by FredT
This way he gets to be a man of the people all the while feeding from the same pork barrel as the rest of the bloodsuckers. The only difference is they are up front about thier earmarks, Pauls seems to backdoor it to preserve his image.
The only differeence im now seeing here is that he spins even his own voting hypocracy :shk:
You guys almost had me beleiving he was different but shucks he is just like the rest of them...... Perhaps worse
left Congress in 1985 after an unsuccessful run for a Senate seat, and quit the Republican Party in February 1987.
At the University of Houston, speaking in front of the student union cafeteria at high noon, Dr. Paul explained why. 'They Are in Our Wallets'
''I listened to Ronald Reagan in the '70's. He told me that he would balance the budget, cut back and get the Government off my back. They are not off our backs, they are in our wallets and into our bedrooms and into our private lives more than ever before.''
query.nytimes.com...
He categorizes Black men as being terrorists simply because they are Black.
Under the headline of ""Terrorist Update," for instance, Paul reported on gang crime in Los Angeles and commented, ""If you have ever been robbed by a black teen-aged male, you know how unbelievably fleet-footed they can be."
www.chron.com...
Then he advocates policy that would have Black children aged 13 to be tried as adults for their crimes simply because they are Black.
"We don't think a child of 13 should be held responsible as a man of 23. That's true for most people, but black males age 13 who have been raised on the streets and who have joined criminal gangs are as big, strong, tough, scary and culpable as any adult and should be treated as such."
www.chron.com...
I guess you've never heard of the Aryan Brotherhood.
Where does Ron Paul stand on this organization? There just as dangerous as any other L.A. and California street gang. Surely he has heard of them as well. But it is only Black gang members at the age of 13 who should be tried as adults? And the point you seem to miss is that he is referring only to Black gang members. Not any other race or ethic creed. His statements are racists. When properly understood, there is no way to interpret those comments otherwise.