It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

I have a few words about Mr. Paul

page: 15
53
<< 12  13  14    16  17  18 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 18 2007 @ 06:27 PM
link   
Why is this nonsense continuing?


You ruined this thread 10 pages ago. Yet you're still in here baiting arguments over topics that are totally un-related to this thread.

This is ridiculous.




posted on Dec, 18 2007 @ 06:27 PM
link   
Yes Richardson has addressed already the issues we face as a country whether domestically or with foreign affairs. He has said he will get all the troops out of Iraq except the US embassy to protect those workers etc. I would personally love to see that embassy destroyed but I know it's probably not going to happen. He's also said he will do investigations into everything that has happened the last seven years which is good. I haven't heard anyone else really say that to be honest. LOL! You're insane if you think Hillary Clinton will lose over Ron Paul. People want a national heatlh care program, people want to have their jobs stay here in the States, people want a better public education system. Everything Ron Paul is against. Look at the issue polls. I find it interesting how Ron Paul doesn't talk about these other issues so much. If he does get the nomination (don't think it's going to happen) people are in for a big surprise.


Originally posted by Mutantalien1947
Southern Belle, I'm not a democrat but to be honest with you the democratic candiate with the most experience above all the other candiates whether republican or democrat is Bill Richardson. I'll have to see where Ron Paul stands on the other issues but my main concern is to keep a democrat out of the White House and if Ron Paul was the republican nominee, he would surely lose to Hillary Clinton. and she scares the hell out of me and would destroy this country.


[edit on 18-12-2007 by Mutantalien1947]



posted on Dec, 18 2007 @ 06:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by Freenrgy2
SB:
This thread is not about your personal beliefs regarding socialism, Civil Rights or the role of government. You have tried to make this thread about you, in other words, you have hijacked this thread.


Precisely. I have warned moderators about this already, they gave her a warning: she continues. Enough is enough.

There is a vice-like grip on other parts of this board to keep people on topic or from using abusive behavior. Southernbelle's attitude has been nothing short of appauling - FOURTEEN PAGES OF THIS CHILDISH BICKERING and SLANDERING! NONE OF IT FOUNDED. NONE OF IT BACKED UP, and NONE OF IT ON TOPIC.

Why this nonsense is allowed in some threads and not in others I'll have no idea. I guess there are too many Ron Paul support threads for moderators to care about this one



posted on Dec, 18 2007 @ 06:30 PM
link   
Apparently it's not so ridiculous since you contradicted yourself by adding to it. If people didn't want to continue it guess what? STOP POSTING! As long as people keep replying etc. to me I'm going to show that respect and reply back. I don't just drop people.


Originally posted by NewWorldOver
Why is this nonsense continuing?


You ruined this thread 10 pages ago. Yet you're still in here baiting arguments over topics that are totally un-related to this thread.

This is ridiculous.



posted on Dec, 18 2007 @ 06:32 PM
link   
P.S. A good way to see whether or not your input is being appreciated is to check your ATS points.

You're at -100+ SouthernBelle, this is because people are hinting over and over: stop ruining this Ron Paul thread. Your input is not appreciated. It is abusive and slanderous and completely off topic. You've highjacked and ruined this thread.

-100+ ATS points
take a HINT for the love of GOD



posted on Dec, 18 2007 @ 06:34 PM
link   
Well if you're talking about specifics than Richardson would. Obama is good at speeches but he needs help with debating. It's so boring to watch him debate. Richardson has been getting better. Hillary has that "ack" problem. I guess this comes back again to y'all looking at the polls you want.


Originally posted by captainplanet
reply to post by Mutantalien1947
 


I disagree with that assessment. I think Ron Paul is the only shot republicans have, he would eat anyone alive in a one on one debate. If republicans would just get behind him, he would be a shoo in. Hillary doesn’t like to talk about specifics and Ron Paul would force her to. I think all the other candidates will just jump into the mudslinging with her and your feared Democrats will win.

[edit]
Ron Paul would add a lot of votes to the standard republican base.

[edit on 18-12-2007 by captainplanet]



posted on Dec, 18 2007 @ 06:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by NewWorldOver
You ruined this thread 10 pages ago. Yet you're still in here baiting arguments over topics that are totally un-related to this thread.


*Ahem* Hint, hint.



posted on Dec, 18 2007 @ 06:41 PM
link   
Well hun first of all don't compare me with your wife. The only change I've made in recent years with my views is going more to the left. I used to be liberal but it never felt right and that's when I discovered socialism. I was doing research for a presentation on Hugo Chavez for a class and decided to research socialism since that's what he is and I wanted to *understand* him better. That's when I became more interested in socialism and when I discovered that fits my views more. Well guess what hun? I have a friend who is a social worker and she says her views have changed more to the left. She's not a socialist like me I don't think but she's not a damn well selfish libertarian either. You love to talk a big game about the government not helping the people. So hun what about the Constitution? What about the freedoms it gives you? That's the government helping you. You have so many government help in there. You seem fine with that government help. Uh no hun. I'm not doing any such thing. You actually had no idea I was a socialist until I mentioned it some pages ago. Before that you had no #ing clue what I was did you? Not at all. You also didn't seem interested at all in my political views of the government but instead you and others here took it upon yourselves to label me for me. You said all sorts of # that was bullcrap. So get off it. I've been doing nothing more than talking about his views from his voting record and how that goes against what the people seem to want in this election. You choose to ignore that but instead say some bs about me and my views. Again, you had no freakin clue what I was until I told you. Get over yourself. Remained on topic? You mean doing like me and posting how Ron Paul's views are #ed up and leaving? Yeah that's on topic! Oh wait...most of y'all were just bitching earlier about how it wasn't. Hypocrite.






posted on Dec, 18 2007 @ 06:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by gunner36
Belle, you being a socialist is not what makes you deranged, you highjacking this thread, and throwing your baseless rants throughout the pages of this discussion is what makes you deranged.

So please for the love of all that is good, add to the original topic or leave. Someone was nice enough to start a thread on why we shouldnt support Ron Paul, please go there to continue your opposition to him, we will all be glad to continue dialogue with you in there.


*ahem* Hint, hint.



posted on Dec, 18 2007 @ 06:42 PM
link   
reply to post by NewWorldOver
 


I must have misread the tittle to this thread. I could have sworn it was about Ron Paul, not Richardson? I guess I just spaced out.



posted on Dec, 18 2007 @ 06:44 PM
link   
And I already responded to them I believe. If you don't want to continue everything than don't add to it and be a hypocrite.


Originally posted by NewWorldOver

Originally posted by gunner36
Belle, you being a socialist is not what makes you deranged, you highjacking this thread, and throwing your baseless rants throughout the pages of this discussion is what makes you deranged.

So please for the love of all that is good, add to the original topic or leave. Someone was nice enough to start a thread on why we shouldnt support Ron Paul, please go there to continue your opposition to him, we will all be glad to continue dialogue with you in there.


*ahem* Hint, hint.



posted on Dec, 18 2007 @ 06:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by SouthernBelle82
Well hun first of all don't compare me with your wife.

Before that you had no #ing clue what I was did you?

You said all sorts of # that was bullcrap. So get off it.

Again, you had no freakin clue what I was until I told you. Get over yourself. Remained on topic?
You mean doing like me and posting how Ron Paul's views are #ed up and leaving? Yeah that's on topic! Oh wait...most of y'all were just bitching earlier about how it wasn't.
Hypocrite.


Yeah... Umm...

We've had enough of you. It's time to leave. By leave I mean, leave these forums. Your behavior is appauling Belle... go read the terms and conditions and count the reasons why. Abusive language, off topic ranting, constant name calling 'hun your a hypocrite hun just a stupid hypocrite prick, so quit bitching at me'


Seriously. Stop it.
A third alert to moderators has been sent.



posted on Dec, 18 2007 @ 06:45 PM
link   
And you've played right along with it so look in the mirror.


Originally posted by NewWorldOver
P.S. A good way to see whether or not your input is being appreciated is to check your ATS points.

You're at -100+ SouthernBelle, this is because people are hinting over and over: stop ruining this Ron Paul thread. Your input is not appreciated. It is abusive and slanderous and completely off topic. You've highjacked and ruined this thread.

-100+ ATS points
take a HINT for the love of GOD



posted on Dec, 18 2007 @ 06:46 PM
link   
Hun if you read through the page someone else mentioned him to me and I replied to them specifically. Get over it. I'm not a rude jackass like *some* people here.


Originally posted by NGC2736
reply to post by NewWorldOver
 


I must have misread the tittle to this thread. I could have sworn it was about Ron Paul, not Richardson? I guess I just spaced out.




posted on Dec, 18 2007 @ 06:46 PM
link   
HEY SOUTHERNBELLE

Please refute the following statement with any evidence you can scratch up..I suspect you wont be able to.

"Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate running for office that has NEVER violated his oath of office and has NEVER violated the constitution of the United States of America"


If you cant prove otherwise than that statement alone holds Ron head and shoulders above each and every other candidate as it relates to their internal constitution and how seriously they take making a pledge to themselves their country and their countrymen.


(Hint, to be fair and balanced (dig at Faux news
) Southernbelle, the challenge above intended to show your lack of knowledge of the current candidates political history and current positions, Ron Paul specifically, the constitution and the oath of office. )



[edit on 18-12-2007 by DisabledVet]



posted on Dec, 18 2007 @ 06:47 PM
link   



posted on Dec, 18 2007 @ 06:47 PM
link   
Let's please stay on topic, and end the personal commentary on fellow members immediately.

Debate can be made without talking about someone else that's a member here, and personal attacks are not going to continue.


[edit on 12/18/07 by niteboy82]



posted on Dec, 18 2007 @ 06:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by NGC2736
reply to post by NewWorldOver
 


I must have misread the tittle to this thread. I could have sworn it was about Ron Paul, not Richardson? I guess I just spaced out.



Yeah it USED to be about Ron Paul and his coverage or lack of coverage in the mainstream media, despite being a hugely popular candidate.

It's been destroyed for well over 10 pages ago. I wonder how many other people are willing to click the ALERT button and get this maniac out of here?


[edit on 18-12-2007 by NewWorldOver]



posted on Dec, 18 2007 @ 06:48 PM
link   
Civil discussion must begin now.

No more rude posts, PLEASE.



posted on Dec, 18 2007 @ 06:48 PM
link   
Yes he did by voting against the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which is a part of the Constitution. He's supposed to protect that but he chose not to. I guess he only wants rich white men who own land to vote.






new topics

top topics



 
53
<< 12  13  14    16  17  18 >>

log in

join