It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You have the audacity to question anyone's else's comprehension with what you wrote addressed to me? What I cited had little to do with Al Qaeda, and everything to do with the Bush administration hindering the 9/11 Commission hearings.
Did you bother to completely read the US Congressional sub-committee hearing transcript, regarding the 9/11 Commission report?
Swampfox. Give up guy. Nobody is buying your regurgitated material.
As any rational, clear minded, good person, can see. No plane crashed in Shanksville
1) Is the USGS map presented in the video indeed from 1994, and if so is it indeed in the same location as the "crash site" of Flight 93?
2) If the USGS map is correct, can an airliner crashing in such a way as detailed by its flight data recorder leave only a round impact crater with no other "scarring" on the ground?
The picture that Ivan has posted at nauseam seems to support the claims made in the video, as there is clearly grass growing out of the "scar" and the dirt appears to be undisturbed and weathered.
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
Same area yes, but the "scar" is not the crash site.
Its not a round crater by any means.
I would be careful about putting too much faith into a video created by someone, who quite frankly, has little to no trained knowledge on the subject.
Ask Maj. Rick Gibney, he is the one who shot it down. Mr Lear, can you deny this?