It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
No I can't. It would be hard for an aircraft to invert itself after it crashed. There were plane parts, you've been shown the pictures, and you continue to deny that there were any.
Inverted either way, could you please establish a precedent where aircraft crashed, inverted themselves, and left no plane parts or contents of the plane?
You hit the nail on the head with this sentence. No 2 crashes are the same. ValuJet flight 592 is the closest comparison I can find. Similar speed, similar angle of impact, and similar results. You completely ignored it.
That means finding actual aircraft crashes actually happening the same way.
I'm not the one saying it. The real-life crash investigators are.
To do what you are saying, a plane would have to be completely vertical from nose to tail, and dropping straight down nose first. When has that ever happened in any actual aircraft crash?
Originally posted by jackinthebox
reply to post by IvanZana
Good point Ivan. Why would this piece survive an impact that made the tail completely disappear, along with almost everything else, if the tail was the last thing to hit the ground? .
Some wack jobs like to say the plane vapourized/ atomized due to its subsonic inverted dive in soft sand leaving no plane parts, fuesalage, 200+ seats, 50+ passengers, 100 peices of luggage, 1,000's of gallons of fuel, wings, tires, rims and without burining or breaking the dry grass that a bumble bee could break
Mabey the window part in this picture was PLANTED to TRY to prove that a plane did crash in Shanksville because the crash site shows without a doubt that no plane crashed there.
Swampfox, I posted my qualifications in support of my comments on whether or not this was a open pit or reclaimed area.
I assume, though, that your response that I may have been the fifth Beatle was a failed attempt at sarcasm.
While I appreciate your comments in the debate on whether or not a plane crashed at Shanksville you might want to reconsider your post about the 12th incarnation of the Dalai Lama.
Since there are posters insisting, without proving forensic evidence for same, there were two 767's and two 757s involved on 9/11,
Please note I said forensic evidence. That means evidence proved to belong only to any object asserted to be a crime weapon and/or part of any crime scene, and to be so beyond any reasonable doubt. The same evidence that has to hold up in any court of law.
Some wack jobs like to say the plane vapourized/ atomized due to its subsonic inverted dive in soft sand leaving no plane parts, fuesalage, 200+ seats, 50+ passengers, 100 peices of luggage, 1,000's of gallons of fuel, wings, tires, rims and without burining or breaking the dry grass that a bumble bee could break.