posted on Dec, 8 2007 @ 11:17 AM
I don't think it's a strange observation at all though I myself would not go as far as saying that that being is even holding anything as I'm only
focusing on the being itself where I'm seeing what looks like a quintessential Grey with a head, eyes, nose, mouth, neck, body, arms... it looks like
it might be holding something but that to me is not important enough to even bother mentioning.
But saying that he's holding something that looks like a clipboard is no more presumptuous than discerning those shapes that are seen in those
threads here on those artifacts found on the Moon for example -- the obelisk that's being talked about in Mike Singh's thread entitled "Proof of
Alien and Obelisk on the Moon" also entails a non-certainty element concerning what those shapes actually represent based on those blurry images that
are shown in such photo's. Below is a contrast enhanced image of that obelisk:
The assumption is that's it's an obelisk though someone else may call it just a jagged pole of some sort that's sticking out of the ground... But
those researchers who are focusing on such artifacts have designated their own terms for such common shapes as this one that are being seen in those
NASA photo's of the Moon and Mars. So are they control towers or buildings or... well, the list can go on and on...? nevertheless I'm sure some out
there have a much more better understanding than most as to what those obelisk's actually could be.
But as for those beings we are seeing in images such as Dorothy's, we are seeing "dimensional bleed through's" where they are attempting to
manifest themselves by using atmospheric 'noise' (including light pollution) and also elements in the actual electric circuitry of the videocam that
Dorothy's using -- and their own electromagnetic field/aura... all of which contributes toward a granulated image result.
These beings actually manipulate that 'noise' to show themselves in images like this. If there's no noise, then they don't have any light (and
different shadings of it) to manipulate to be able to appear in movies and photo's.
-- and last but not least, the stochastic resonance that exist between the recorder (Dorothy) and 'them' also contributes immensely towards these
photographic manifestations too.
So as you can see, they work simultaneously with several different elements in order to manifest in these photographic images. That they are not
National Geographic Quality does not mean that we should discard such images because of that... then we would be losing out on an opportunity to at
least evaluate what we ARE seeing whereby entertaining the notion that they may in fact be trying to communicate to us by letting us know that they do
in fact exist.
Perhaps they don't come in clearer because they feel that many would not be able to intellectually or emotionally 'handle' clear distinct images of
'them' as they fear that such individuals would suffer from mental breakdowns causing mass hysteria... and so on... Maybe our time has not yet
arrived yet for clearer more distinct images of 'them' but the more they come through for those us who are able to capture photographic images of
them -- and the more people out there who decide to see if they themselves have the ability to capture such anomalous images... the closer we will get
to "them" deciding to finally come in clearer for us as humanity will have had more time to "process" such information at least on an intellectual
[edit on 8-12-2007 by Palasheea]