posted on Feb, 14 2009 @ 04:39 PM
The developed film showed an explosion of movement with what appears to be a "signature in light"...
I saw Izatt's DVD at a MUFON meeting, Jan '09, and there was group speculation of 'signatures', spelling out "Dorothy" too. I can clearly see
white lines on the right corner of the shot that would appear to be signature-like, from a human perspective on the shot provided. However, if the
"light beings" are communicating in writing, what is their alphabet? Are they trying to copy ours? If they are capable of communicating with Dorothy
using telepathy, why hasn't a ufo researcher thought to short-cut the "Light Show", and go right to Dorothy with OUR questions for the "light
beings"? Do the light bursts constitute a "language", or perhaps "books" of information that we are to decode? I guess I'm waiting for Dorothy
to explain it all in her next DVD.
I admit to not knowing much, but I'm full of questions.
What I found fascinating in the light bursts were the curved broken lines, and the severe elipses, light streams apparently generated simultaneously
from each of the ship's light array, in 1/18 of a second! I counted 6-10 lights where the bursts eminated from which changed with different filmings.
(See the still provided by palasheea) I would like a bonified energy physicist, if he dare post here, to explain how curved broken lines of light
could be formed in our atmosphere, and be directed to form these tight elipses? And what human source of energy/magnetic force could bend light with
seemingly complete control, matching the bends of other independent lights above a mountain in Vancouver?
I know that some of the still photo's Izatt provided in the DVD are ones reproduced later and are on the Net. The broken radius lines in the stills,
at least, would imply a 3-dimensional curve, as some come around to meet their origins. I don't know how that could be created by a human source
without a computer CGI function, or by perhaps adding radius layers to the still photo later. And also, I've never seen real light travel in broken
lines, as it typically appears as dots, particles, or lines. Some of the radii appear like gobs of plasma as they are not uniformly shaped in length
or diameter, in the segments, end to end, or in width. Wait, I think I've seen broken lines in pictures from cyclotron atom smashers, which are the
trajectories of particles, but their origins are from a single point of impact. Dorothy's lights have multiple light sources, and most travel
independently of other lights, some intersecting, and mixing, but I've yet to see the radii segments intersect or combine in any still shot so far.
I've seen three. Imagine what we'll learn when all 30,000 feet of film is digitized.
Wondering as I wander...