Originally posted by Yankenstein
You lost me. The videos depict a jet defying all three, but for the skeptics who still insist CNN is more reliable than Newton, lets try to cut a few
columns in half with a wing section.
I must say, it's very amusing that you speak for Newton, yet those who have devoted their lives to the study of physics--the professional scientists
and engineers who have done research on this--ALL disagree with you.
Are they ALL dis-info agents? All liars and frauds? Worldwide there are no credible physicists willing to speak out against such obviously erroneous
research that's been published on this topic? There seems to be pilots and architects and engineers willing to question other aspects of 9/11. Where
are the Physicists for 9/11 Truth with the smoking gun mathematical equations proving that the WTC impact damage is impossible?
Have you ever really given some good hard thought to the idea that the subjective "common sense" you so adamantly cling to might just be
in this case? What does your common sense tell you regarding the possibility that EVERY single piece of video footage (50+ clips) is
fake, that NO footage survived of what really happened despite the thousands of people who potentially could have been filming that day.
How is it that, employing your common sense, it's more likely that all the research is wrong, all the scientists are frauds, all the video is fake,
all the witnesses are liars--than it is that your mental conception of the jet impact damage is possibly mistaken? It is more likely that ALL of that
other evidence is wrong, or that you're wrong?
My common sense begs the question.