It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by MikeVet
You're so clever. I am in the presence of greatness.....
Just learned from you, like being clever to leave out the other catagories of widows in your count. As stated NIST was making a guess at bast onthe number of windows, and most were due to impact not fire.
Open
Window
Glass in
Place
“Can’t
See”
Originally posted by MikeVet
Oh, so NIST is "guessing" but you have the scoop, eh? So what methods did you use to determine the accurate count?
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by MikeVet
Oh, so NIST is "guessing" but you have the scoop, eh? So what methods did you use to determine the accurate count?
You have failed to show how NIST got the numbers. (beside guessing)
Originally posted by OrionStars
reply to post by MikeVet
So do I know how they got the numbers. In the world of statistics, it is called arriving at a guesstimate or playing the odds of what, if anything, is known variable(s). Then throwing in potential unknowns as well.
For example, if each floor had so many windows, and any type of fire was on those floors, they guessed high in calculating how many potential windows were broken, by impact and gas pressure from thermal/kinetic energy enveloping smoke breaking out windows. They went high on the assumption that is what happened. Based on the smoke they saw pouring out of the holes, and assuming the same amount of smoke was filling those floors looking for an exit as well.
Originally posted by OrionStars
Are you saying that gravity working with vertical weight, mass, momentum, and velocity is a gravitational vacuum?
Are you saying there is no such physical occurrence in physics as gravitational vacuum, such as that in quantum physics? Vertically, that is what sets a building into free fall with least resistance once the most strategic vertical supports are removed.
Never studied black holes? Because implosion of buildings works on the same quantum physics principles as black holes. Black holes are created by stars imploding and pulling themselves into themselves aka gravitational implosion.
Gravity, momentum weight and mass literally create vacuum effect from the ground up, as the weight and mass is increasing in momentum velocity speed impact. decompressing all air and any loose insignificant resistance outward, as the buildings are dropping.
Originally posted by OrionStars
Since both walls were attached to the buildings, I have no idea why anyone would put explosives in the exterior facade, exterior primary load supports, or finished exterior walls. I have no idea where in all those support tubes they would find correct planting places, on the exterior of either building. I did not note any bundled explosives being attached to any parts of the exterior walls. How anyone would have gotten them between the two exterior walls, is something I never waste my time contemplating.
No one needed any exterior controlled demolitions, directly due to the fact the twin towers had no corner supports. Only with corner supports would explosives be used for cutting. Plus, as I stated above, the two steel exterior walls were attached to the buildings.