It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
But the official story states there were jet fuel fires on LOWER floors.
Also that jet fuel ran down to the basement and casued the explosion in the basement.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
But the official story states there were jet fuel fires on LOWER floors.
The wing hit on the 78th floor, fuel tanks are in the wing.
Originally posted by Damocles
was there some aspect of the design of the core that would prohibit this from happening?
isnt there also a tank in the other wing and the belly of the plane? so wouldnt THAT fuel have been free to also go anywhere it wants? just asking, this isnt my area.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Yes, elevator shafts not going from the upper floors to the basement. Floor areas sealed to prevent fires from jumping floors.
But the question is, Where were the jet fuel fires the official story talks about?
The wing hit the 78th floor, there are fuel tanks in the wing.
The firmen reported only small isoloated fires.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Yes there are tanks in the wings and in the belly, but i do believe that fuel would have ran down not up.
Originally posted by Damocles
yes, on 78. do we KNOW they checked up to 78? we dont have reports they checked HIGHER than 78. (or did i miss something?)
also, what was on floor 78? was it vacant? was it one of the sky lobbies? what was typically found in a sky lobby floor? was it pretty much just an observation deck or was part of it offices or storage?
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Well we do not have reports of them going above 78 but i hope the would not have missed burning jet on the floors on the way up to 78.
78 was a skylobby, with machinery and equipment for elevators.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
The wing hit on the 78th floor, fuel tanks are in the wing.
Also that jet fuel ran down to the basement and casued the explosion in the basement.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
We are talking about an airframe and wings that are made from thin aluminum that even the animation from Purue shows is being shredded by the steel as soon as it enters the building.
Originally posted by Pilgrum
I'm still seeing an overwhelming consensus that a lot of flammable liquid was delivered to the inside of the building from the outside so doesn't that imply that it went the through the observed hole created by its container?
Originally posted by neformore
Its too bad we're not talking solely about an airframe and wings made from Thin Aluminium.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Yes we are talking about thin aluminum. Thin enough the small birds can put holes into the wings and airframe. As shown before.
Thin enough that hitting 1 light pole can shear off a large section of wing. As shown before.
Thin enough that hitting any obsticle even small trees will tear open the airframe and shear off wings. As shown before.
Those are the facts.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Yes we are talking about thin aluminum.
[edit on 31-12-2007 by ULTIMA1]
Originally posted by neformore
Instead we are talking about a 200,000lb + mass hitting a hollow box steel wall in speeds upwards of 400mph
That mass is comprised of an airframe made out of extremely light aluminium
Originally posted by OrionStars
Actually, you attacked the poster's capabilities with your tangent.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by MikeVet
Yes, there's plenty of evidence. Here's an example -
Do you any other evidence besides NIST? Since NIST has proven not to be the best to quote for evdience.
As stated most of the videos and photos do show the fires burning out well before the collaspe and only black smoke, meaning oxygen starved fire.
Reports from firemen making it to the 78th floor only reported small isolated fires, not the big jet fuel fires we were told by the official story.
Originally posted by neformore
A 200,000lb+ mass hit the WTC. Deal with it, because that IS a fact.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
The poster denied the 767 speed on 9/11 was comparable to the muzzle speed of a small revolver. He was flatly wrong about that. He's also repeatedly failed to do math on a 5th grade level, when a simple calculation of KE was required.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by neformore
A 200,000lb+ mass hit the WTC. Deal with it, because that IS a fact.
Yes but it did not cause enough damage to cause or help cause the collapse of the towers, as most reports state.
Originally posted by six
reply to post by MikeVet
No matter what, Ultima will continue to argue that they were O2 deprived fires. I have provided him with ample proof to the contrary, but since it does not fit his version of events, he chooses to ignore them or engage in a circular argument that leads to nowhere.