It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Pilgrum
The evidence is there that some components of that plane managed to break out from the opposite side of the building.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Do we have any part number on the engine found on the street to match to the aircraft ?
Originally posted by robertfenix
Bird's eye view aircraft impact
The right side engine ripped through virtually un-impeded on the impact floor and out the building (in multiple section not intact)
The left engine smacked into the core and become debris within the tower collapse as were the two engines from the impact into the WTC 1.
Telephone
860-289-8661
FAX
860-289-1868
Electro-Methods, Inc.
330 Governors Highway
South Windsor CT 06074
Electro-Methods, Inc, is a registered ISO9001-2000/AS9002 manufacturer of machined and fabricated complex parts and assemblies in the compressor, turbine and combustor sections of turbine engines.
Originally posted by OrionStars
reply to post by robertfenix
That is someone's drawing. How is that a true "bird's eye view"? Even a bird could not see through all that massive ball of orange flame and dense black smoke.
Originally posted by OrionStars
The part number should be etched into the part. If someone had it, they had the part number.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by MikeVet
238 broken by the impacts. 1312 missing by the time of collapse. 133 in place at the time of collapse.
How many could not be counted as missing becasue of being smokey?
Do you really want me to post quotes from your site, to prove to everyone here how wrong you are?
And how much i have owned you?
Originally posted by Pilgrum
There's also the issue of what make of engine it should have been as UA supposedly only had Pratt & Whitney engines on their 767s so that's another bone of contention.
N612UA Boeing 767-222 United Airlines
[Serial number 21873 LN:41
Type 767-222
First flight date 27/01/1983
Test registration
Flightlog
UA175 BOS->LAX 11/09/01 N612UA
UA111 ANC->ORD 27/09/89 N612UA
UA111 ANC->ORD 02/04/88 N612UA
Plane information as BUILT information
Serial number 21873 LN:41
Type 767-222
Engine manufacturer Pratt & Whitney
Engine type JT9D-7R4D
Delivery year 1983
Originally posted by MikeVet
You're so clever. I am in the presence of greatness.....
Open
Window
Glass in
Place
“Can’t
See”
The 94th floor fires can be seen at many locations between windows 94-405 and 94-448. Most of the fires are burning at isolated locations near the floor. The only window where flames are protruding out is
94-405.
Relatively small fires are observed at several locations on the 94th floor. Heavy smoke continues to come
from window 94-108.
Originally posted by OrionStars
Without the unique individual SN identified part, that part could fit on any engine fitting on any 767 in anyone's airline fleet. No doubt about it.
Unless, someone took the time to document the SN of every part going into any specifc plane, with an SN finished product number. If that happened, first the plane would have to be found with a particular model SN with those documented part SNs.
It works like this. Someone documents all the SNs of parts in engines, which have individual SN finished product numbers. That engine SN is documented to belong to only one specific finished product plane with an individual SN number.
Otherwise, those involved cannot prove there was no planted parts when suspicion falls heavily on them.
Originally posted by OrionStars
Then the US bureaucrats got in on the act, and it got even murkier. My question was, "How did they know who it was in less than 24 hours?" Then when the words were mouthed by people, such as Rumsfeld, "We had no idea......" Then how did they know so quickly who did it and named bin Laden on 9/11?
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
What got me is the media was stating it was a terrorist attack as soon as the second plane hit, but the DoD did not state officially it was a terrorist attack untill later in the day.
I guess the media has better resources then the DoD.