|
|
Topic started on 10-10-2007 @ 06:55 AM by grover
|
            
Crashed drug plane owned by US Government?
www.boingboing.net
 Interesting story about the Gulfstream II jet filled with 3.7 tons of cocaine that crashed in the Yucatan a couple of weeks ago. According to
the Austin American Statesman, this plane has previously flown to Guantanamo Bay, which has a highly restricted airspace:
Some news reports have linked the plane to the transport of terrorist suspects to the U.S. detention center at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, but those
reports cite logs that indicate only that the plane flew twice between Washington and Guantánamo and once between Oxford, Conn., and
Guantánamo. (visit the link for the full news article)
|
copyright & usage
|
Click here for more Breaking Alternative News topics
Hot Topics
|
Top Topics
|
This Week
|
Subscribe
|
Home
|
reply posted on 10-10-2007 @ 06:55 AM by grover
|
 
I don't know what to think about this story. The article states that the plane had changed hands twice in the past few weeks but the CIA is known to
shuffle the "ownership" of its assets periodically to make tracing them harder.
I think back to the claims first made in the 80's that the flooding of American drug markets with Cocaine was a CIA operation to finance its black
book activities. Its not like they haven't done things like that before.
And, with this administrations contempt for the law... who knows.
www.boingboing.net
(visit the link for the full news article)
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-10-2007 @ 07:00 AM by anhinga
|
Nice find Grover, ah, I still love that DOG avatar! How's the pooch?.... anyway, what's strange about this is that the planes were headed/have
been to Gitmo? What, are they getting the 'terrorists' hoped up on drugs to try them? Insanity.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-10-2007 @ 07:01 AM by Rilence
|
reply to post by grover
Opium production in Afghanistan has increased a great deal since the US/Coalition forces began their occupation....
This article is one more piece in the puzzle, I guess its a matter of putting them together...
Good find, Grover
Peace
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 10-10-2007 @ 07:14 AM by Silcone Synapse
|
Not for the first time,eh Grover...
Bit of a piddly amount though,3.7tons.
I thought the USG drug smuggling planes usually carried 5.5tons per plane.
Oh well.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-10-2007 @ 07:27 AM by grover
|
   
What I fear is that they are selling the cocaine to do things that even this shameless administration is ashamed of.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-10-2007 @ 07:49 AM by InSpiteOf
|
I think Silcone Synapse is hinting at this article
Cocaine One
This article is from last year but certainly is an interesting read.
Last I checked, the owner of the plane said he sold it ten days prior to its discovery by mexican officials (with 5.5 tons of cocaine) in, heres the
kicker, the Yucatan region.
Now if these planes are CIA assets, think of all the raw tonnage of cocaine (and most likely other nasty drugs) being imported, virtually undetected,
in the US.
Edit to add: Im not sure if you were serious or not grover, but i doubt this administration (or past administrations that have been involved in such
disgusting acts) is ashamed of this or other smuggling operations. You give them too much moral credit.
[edit on 10-10-2007 by InSpiteOf]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-10-2007 @ 07:58 AM by apc
|
Grover, do you hate Bush so much that you have to tie every nefarious thing in this world to him?
Is that a rhetorical question? Is this a rhetorical question?
I don't think Bush is involved at all with government drug smuggling beyond his ongoing involvement with the CIA. Plausible deniability would have
to be maintained, after all.
I mean come on, a plane full of cocaine goes down... he'd have to declare war on somebody.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-10-2007 @ 08:16 AM by Silcone Synapse
|
 
Aren't they great over at the CIA?
They are happy to warn Gore/Clinton not to accept campaign funds from drug smuggling people trafficking Triads,and they are also happy to smuggle
drugs themselves to fund secret and illegal wars.
I can't say that the CIA have been useful at all,unless the definition of being useful is to put dictators into power,train secret police to torture
men women and children,wage illegal dirty wars,dominate the MSM,plant fake stories,murder people to cover their deeds,smuggle crack and heroin across
the globe,create false flag terror attacksEtc,etc.
If that is the definition of being useful-then the CIA get an A+ for effort.
Who would have thought that the country which prides itself on "freedom" "liberty" and "democracy" would have such an organisation operating in
this day and age.
Edit SP
[edit on 10-10-2007 by Silcone Synapse]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-10-2007 @ 08:19 AM by Rilence
|
nah, it ain't poor old Dubya's fault...I mean, sure, 20 yrs ago he would have loved to gotten hold of a big bag of "things go better with" and
snorted his way thru it...
But now..not likely...
Drug running has been a manistay of US intelligence services since the year dot...Why would that change ? Its a great earner, and besides, it helps
keep a certain population of the sheeple round the world in their stupor and oblivious as to what is going on in the world...
As Metallica said, sad but true...
Peace
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 10-10-2007 @ 08:38 AM by grover
|
      
reply to post by apc
Did I say bush? No I did not. I said this administration which is far more than bush/cheney.
The fact remains though that this administration is the most secret obsessed since Nixon and we still don't know all the stuff they did.
Management sets the tone of any organization and the management of this administration has set a tone of secrecy and an attitude that to them... the
rules do not apply.
So that said... anything could be going on under the blanket of black operations including drug running to finance things they want no one to know
anything about.
Its been done before. Does Iran/Contra ring a bell?
[edit on 10-10-2007 by grover]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-10-2007 @ 09:08 AM by jpm1602
|
I JUST read America was going to come down heavy on Afghan poppy crops. Interesting how production has skyrocketed since we brought democracy to
everybody. The mullahs like the mob hated drug runners. Would not be surprised at all if the CIA were profitting hansomely from the proceeds to fund
our wars.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-10-2007 @ 10:29 AM by deltaboy
|
Originally posted by jpm1602
I JUST read America was going to come down heavy on Afghan poppy crops. Interesting how production has skyrocketed since we brought democracy to
everybody. The mullahs like the mob hated drug runners. Would not be surprised at all if the CIA were profitting hansomely from the proceeds to fund
our wars.
Probably because the Taliban got their butts kicked and need a source of funds to keep their Jihad against American coalition in Afghanistan. Where
the Taliban going to get their funds from? Afghan taxpayers?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-10-2007 @ 10:55 AM by Rilence
|
The Taliban got their butts kicked ??
Seems somebody has a problem with keeping up with current events in Afghanistan...
The only people who gain thru increase opiate production in Afghanistan in the US/coalition forces...
How precisely does the Taliban benefit from same, when they have next to zero control over the product leaving the country...
Hmmmmm ???
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-10-2007 @ 11:00 AM by deltaboy
|
Originally posted by Rilence
The Taliban got their butts kicked ??
Seems somebody has a problem with keeping up with current events in Afghanistan...
Oh so you think the Taliban are still in control of the whole Afghan nation and that American forces and bases are outside the country and the Taliban
are not like in Pakistan since 2001 invasion?
The only people who gain thru increase opiate production in Afghanistan in the US/coalition forces...
How precisely does the Taliban benefit from same, when they have next to zero control over the product leaving the country...
Hmmmmm ???
Pffft did you even notice how much territory are being controlled by the Afghan govt. and American led coaltion? Hell we got Taliban fighters running
around killing American troops as well as kidnapping. You got Taliban forces moving back and forth on the Afghan-Pakistan border smuggling weapons
and drugs for their Jihad efforts.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-10-2007 @ 11:33 AM by Gools
|
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 10-10-2007 @ 12:08 PM by TheAvenger
|
Originally posted by grover
[
Did I say bush? No I did not. I said this administration which is far more than bush/cheney.
[edit on 10-10-2007 by grover]
What a sad day it will be for so many when the "current administration" is no longer around to blame for all of the ills on the planet.
[edit on 10/10/2007 by TheAvenger]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-10-2007 @ 12:36 PM by grover
|

No this is not a thread about the Taliban... but I will say one thing about them... they suppressed opium production and trade when they were in
power. And, it rebounded and more than doubled after they fell. That is a fact.
Originally posted by TheAvenger
Originally posted by grover
[
Did I say bush? No I did not. I said this administration which is far more than bush/cheney.
[edit on 10-10-2007 by grover]
What a sad day it will be for so many when the "current administration" is no longer around to blame for all of the ills on the planet.
[edit on 10/10/2007 by TheAvenger]
What a happy day it will be for those who hate all things liberal and Democratic when they can start blaming them for all the ills of the planet....
again!
 
[edit on 10-10-2007 by grover]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-10-2007 @ 12:52 PM by FreeThinkerIdealist
|
reply to post by Silcone Synapse
so basically, the CIA is where all the true gangsters/mobsters went ...
maybe it stands for Columbian Italian Association
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-10-2007 @ 01:20 PM by Gools
|
Originally posted by grover
...they suppressed opium production and trade when they were in power. And, it rebounded and more than doubled after they fell. That is a fact.
This is true, I'm just trying to avoid another "War On Terror" bickering match involving some usual suspects.
.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |