It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ferretman2
You complain because the conspiracry theories are not discussed.....then you complain when they are.
You can't have it both ways (though most CT'ers try too) if you are actually looking for the truth.
Originally posted by Griff
My question is:
If there is no Conspiracy, why are "they" trying so hard to "debunk" them? If the theories are so crazy, why do we have news shows "debunking" them at all? If their story could hold water on it's own, why the need to have a plethora of TV specials "debunking" 9/11 myths?
"The lady doth protest too much, methinks": Shakespeare
Originally posted by six
Griff a question for you since this up your alley.
I saw something the other day that said that WTC 7 was basically a trussed supported building anchored at the bottom. The diagram showed three trusses.
What was the safety factor built into this building? I have not seen that stated anywhere.
If it was only supported by three trusses, and one failed, do you think it was possible for the others to carry/redistribute the load?
Are trusses known to fail easily if they are damaged?
In our training, we are taught that truss roofs are not to be trusted if they are damaged, because if one goes they all can go. But we are not taught anything about truss supported buildings...and it has been a LONG time since my engineering classes.