It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"Whatever reason they were called out for it just wasn't there and the citizens of the neighborhood were never in any danger and they're not in any danger now,” Dave Thomas says.
A man could use any weapon to harm someone if he wants. If a man has one gun and one bullet. Or if guns dont exist, then a knife or rock would suffice. So why get rid of guns?
He doesnt have any guns?
Of course he has guns!
The man had over 18,000 rounds of ammo!
If they didnt find any guns he must have them stashed somewhere else. The man was planning on using the ammo to "defend those he loves" during the comming economic failure.
Tell me how he would defend those he loves with bullets and no gun?
By throwing the ammo real hard?
i see your logic my friend it would be great if we could gather up the worlds weapons and destroy them
So all it takes for probable cause is someone filing a restraining order on you?!! What am I missing?
So all it takes is for someone to be judged mentally ill and we can't have ammo? Aren't we all mentally ill since we're on this forum?
Keeping him under a watchful eye is one thing...
Originally posted by jedimiller
well, I would question it too. why does a homeowner need that many guns and ammunition? what's his motivation? he might use them to take revenge or harm someone. BTW I am all for disarming civilians or even destroying all hand weapons once and for all. In this case, I believe it was wise for them to raid his home.
Originally posted by Mirthful Me
The day due diligence died...
No reason to research, let's just post a video and follow like lemmings. Never mind that he had recently been under psychiatric evaluation, never mind that he had a restraining order against him... Nah, Virginia Tech?
Seems as though they had probable cause to me... And I'm about as big a Second Amendment type as you'll find.