STS-75 (tether) Extended analysis (many sterwing objects), page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times


reply posted on 18-9-2007 @ 02:21 AM by flice
kk... before I go belching off Is the footage that we all have seen so many times THE actual footage. Is it straight from Nasa's cams and haven't been through the hands of some regular Joe before it was put on the net?

I agree there are a lot of strange things (or "things I can't explain myself" is probably better to say) but then last night I kinda by chance saw something. Something very down to Earth...

this is the link for the tether video... fast forward to 4:48

Youtube Tether video


Now this is a photo I took with my camera phone yesterday:



(if link doesn't work use this manually... my ATS uploads' links never seem to work):
files.abovetopsecret.com...


they look pretty similar don't they? I could probably make em even more similar had I tried hard for 2 more secs.

My photo is actually just a cd that's reflecting ceiling light onto a near by wall / closet. Was easy to do, just had to tilt and shift the cd till I thought I had the right shape and all.

So, I just thought that maybe just maybe some of those images from the tether video has been edited?

That's my 2 pence for today. Cherio...

Ps. sorry if you already have been over the cd theory
edit: selfpun... yes, the guy must have been using a hell of a lot cds

[edit on 18/9/07 by flice]


reply posted on 18-9-2007 @ 04:07 AM by StarNeon
Originally posted by flice
kk... before I go belching off Is the footage that we all have seen so many times THE actual footage. Is it straight from Nasa's cams and haven't been through the hands of some regular Joe before it was put on the net?

I agree there are a lot of strange things (or "things I can't explain myself" is probably better to say) but then last night I kinda by chance saw something. Something very down to Earth...

this is the link for the tether video... fast forward to 4:48

Youtube Tether video


Now this is a photo I took with my camera phone yesterday:



(if link doesn't work use this manually... my ATS uploads' links never seem to work):
files.abovetopsecret.com...


they look pretty similar don't they? I could probably make em even more similar had I tried hard for 2 more secs.

My photo is actually just a cd that's reflecting ceiling light onto a near by wall / closet. Was easy to do, just had to tilt and shift the cd till I thought I had the right shape and all.

So, I just thought that maybe just maybe some of those images from the tether video has been edited?

That's my 2 pence for today. Cherio...

Ps. sorry if you already have been over the cd theory
edit: selfpun... yes, the guy must have been using a hell of a lot cds

[edit on 18/9/07 by flice]


Thank you my friend, for proving that the objects in space really are huge metallic disks pulsating and moving in different speeds.



reply posted on 18-9-2007 @ 04:19 AM by flice
reply to post by StarNeon


You failed to answer my question:

is there a posibilty that this movie got into someones hands who then edited it before it hit the internet?
If enough people agree on something it becomes truth, no? (especially here...)

So if this video indeed was edited and just one guy believed it... downloaded it and uploaded again... then some other guy came and saw it, believed it and so forth.

[edit on 18/9/07 by flice]


reply posted on 24-11-2007 @ 01:35 PM by Alien Abduct
reply to post by ArMaP


you seem to have some knowledge about cameras and focus and what-not. Maybe you could explain Mr. David Sarita's pointing out that the UFOs were passing behind the tether? I'm not saying you along with other Astronauts are wrong about them being ice particals or just other debris floating around that are severely out of focus. But he has a very convincing point that in my opinion hasn't been adequately explained away by the people arguing against him. Maybe you could explain in a more detailed precise way other than "they are just out of focus particals".



reply posted on 24-11-2007 @ 02:40 PM by ArMaP
reply to post by Alien Abduct

OK, I will try to explain.

I always thought that they could be out of focus objects near the camera, but I could not be sure, so I tried to reproduce the situation, but with obvious limitations. I could not have an object with the size and shape of the tether at a distance of some tens of miles or even 100 miles, I could not have ice crystals floating around me and I could not have access to the camera used.

Instead I used a light source strongly out of focus and a string with a light shining on it (but not as far as I wanted) in a dark room. The image bellow is one frame of the video I made.


As you can see at the bottom of the circular shape, it is difficult to know just by looking at the image if the string is behind or in front of the circular shape, and it may even look like the string is casting a shadow on the red circle, but that was not the case. The red circle was a LED from my Pocket PC that was being held near the camera and the string was more or less one metre behind.

I know that this proves nothing, but it shows that an out of focus small object can appear to be behind another object when in fact it is in front and much closer.


reply posted on 27-2-2008 @ 02:10 PM by pressed
I've been doing a lot of research into this video and have come up with several possible theories, much like everyone else here. But that's it. Just theories. And that's all we will have until NASA delivers a complete scientific explanation of the experement, a complete analysis of the data gathered durring the experement would be nice too. (High hopes!)

Anywho. To BEST understand what it is we all see in the video, we must understand what NASA was doing. I'm going to jump around here. Follow the links.

1) Plasma (physics), an ionized gas where the electrons in the atom are separate from the nucleus. It is the fourth state of matter.

2) The STS-75 mission was performed at an altitude of 287km above the Earths surface. This places them in the Thermosphere where there are still gases present (primarily carbon dioxide and water vapor). www.quaest.io...

2a) Also in this part of the atmosphere solar radiation causes ionization. en.wikipedia.org...

Further study of plasma led me to this: stinet.dtic.mil...

This is the best overall analysis I've seen: www.nasas-unknowns.com...

Summary: From all I have read it seems that TSS-1r was a very complicated imaging device (a 12 mile long one) that allowed NASA to see movement or electrical disturbances w/in the plasma field. I am no doctor yet, so don't quote me. I wish to hell NASA would release more information so we could all better understand. And on that note, you must know that the video of the TSS-1r that we all see is not complete! The only part of the video we see is the tail end, AFTER the shuttle passes closest to the TSS-1r. So, what's on the majority of the STS-75 videos?

What's in your plasma?
CWP


reply posted on 2-3-2008 @ 07:19 AM by PureET
Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to post by Alien Abduct

OK, I will try to explain.

I always thought that they could be out of focus objects near the camera, but I could not be sure, so I tried to reproduce the situation, but with obvious limitations. I could not have an object with the size and shape of the tether at a distance of some tens of miles or even 100 miles, I could not have ice crystals floating around me and I could not have access to the camera used.

Instead I used a light source strongly out of focus and a string with a light shining on it (but not as far as I wanted) in a dark room. The image bellow is one frame of the video I made.

As you can see at the bottom of the circular shape, it is difficult to know just by looking at the image if the string is behind or in front of the circular shape, and it may even look like the string is casting a shadow on the red circle, but that was not the case. The red circle was a LED from my Pocket PC that was being held near the camera and the string was more or less one metre behind.

I know that this proves nothing, but it shows that an out of focus small object can appear to be behind another object when in fact it is in front and much closer.



Puleeze armap,

If you where really holding that string behind your PocketPC, wouldn't the PocketPC block the light of the string? Yes it would since it is BEHIND the light source.

So that would mean the string was actualy INFRONT of the light source

This looks like you are fabricating false arguments.... Explain?

[edit on 2-3-2008 by PureET]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 8 days ago with 65 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 17 days ago with 60 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 11 days ago with 31 member flags
The Dyatlov Pass Incident--Russia\'s Mountain of Death
  Posted 18 days ago with 28 member flags
The Aurora, Texas UFO Incident (1897)
  Posted 2 days ago with 27 member flags