It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

STS-75 (tether) Extended analysis (many sterwing objects)

page: 2
5
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 3 2007 @ 02:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by Luminal


Yes, very simple.

And no imagination at all.


But hey if they'll keep trying one day they'll understand.

Like I said everybody should watch the David Serada thing...

Clearly allot of people don't know they'r cases and post they're feelings without reasonable research.

So if you wanna know the most important facts about this STS-75 tape, watch Mr. Serada!!

He even explains how these things can travel and he demonstrates the object on a TV-screen thing real clear.

It will clear things up for sure.


-PureET




posted on Sep, 3 2007 @ 04:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by PureET
So if you wanna know the most important facts about this STS-75 tape, watch Mr. Serada!!

He even explains how these things can travel and he demonstrates the object on a TV-screen thing real clear.
How does he know all those important facts?

Was he the one who made the tape? Was he there when someone else made the tape?

And how does he know how those things can travel, have the things told him how they work, or were those things made by him?

What makes him a specialist in those flying objects?

PS: isn't his name "Sereda" instead of "Serada"? Or I am mixing two different Davids?



posted on Sep, 3 2007 @ 04:43 PM
link   
I feel some posters are splitting hairs here. Whether there is intelligence behind these object I can't say, nor can anyone else for that matter. My amazement is that these objects are huge! The tether is 12 miles long and some of those object which go BEHIND the tether must be a mile or so wide. That in it self is reason enough to be amazed that NASA doesn't acknowledge them more. Serada himself explains how the tether is charged and is almost neon like in its illumination, I feel some of these objects are ions that have been supercharged as well. That being said they are still huge.



posted on Sep, 3 2007 @ 05:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by Rhain
Serada himself explains how the tether is charged and is almost neon like in its illumination, I feel some of these objects are ions that have been supercharged as well. That being said they are still huge.
I think that they are only out of focus.

Have you ever tried photographing a light against the night sky with manual focus? If you have you know what I am talking about, if you do not know I can only say that bright things out of focus against a dark background look huge.



posted on Sep, 3 2007 @ 05:56 PM
link   
ArMaP@ Im not sure, but either you talk about some other video, but did you even watch the video PureET posted ? The guy clearly explains that the object/s cannot be out of focus. And i happen to be quite familiar with cameras my self and i understand how they work pretty well, so i can only agree with him. If this is fake then it has to be a very unique camera error.

And not only that, what amazed me was the pattern on the ships "waves pulses?" matched the description of the "over the light speed" explanation very well. (Ofcourse this is just a theory)

And if it´s wrong, then i did´nt know dust could pulsate like that...




posted on Sep, 3 2007 @ 06:39 PM
link   
Luminal
Did you saw my out of focus Venus?

That is why I say that those objects are out of focus, because bright objects against a black background (or in my case a blue background) look like that.


Edit: I forgot to add that anyone with a good imagination can create a plausible explanation to any event.

[edit on 3/9/2007 by ArMaP]



posted on Sep, 4 2007 @ 10:07 AM
link   
ArMap, ive seen you picture but ofcourse the situation is not the same.

If you take a look on the video that PureET posted, you can clearly see in the beginning (01:39min) the UFO is moving away from the camera towards the earth. If it was dust, then it would be out of focus and then come it to focus and then dissapear because it´s too small. But it stays in focus, remains the same size without any blur around it ect...

Also the antenna part, the UFO is passing behind it, and since the antenna is quite far away, then every thing far beyond that would be in focus too, unless it´s too far away, then it would become smaller but still be in focus.

So if the dust was close infront of camera, then there should be much more blur on the dust since the camera have focused on the object that is far way, and we can clearly see that its in focus...

If the dust was half way out there, it would not even be visible. Unless it´s a huge alien "dustball" from under the bed.

I hope you get it



posted on Sep, 5 2007 @ 06:25 AM
link   
reply to post by ArMaP
 


Don't be a fricking smartass and watch the damn tape boy!

Don't think you deny ignorance, this is exactly what YOU are doing my friend.



posted on Sep, 5 2007 @ 07:40 AM
link   
I am sure he watched the tape, he just doesn't see what you guys are so desperate to believe.



posted on Sep, 5 2007 @ 08:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by PureET
Don't be a fricking smartass and watch the damn tape boy!
First, my boyhood has passed some time ago, but thanks anyway.


However, I will not do what you want me to do, especialy if you talk to me like you think you are my father or my superior.

If you are referring to that 1:32:39 tape, I do not have the time to watch it, it's as simple as that. 1:32:39 is almost half of my free time each day.


Don't think you deny ignorance, this is exactly what YOU are doing my friend.
I may not be denying ignorance, but I am not willing to reduce my already poor quality of life just to see a video that would probably show me nothing new.

If a video about another video has not information that can be condensed in the form of text then is a video I do not want to watch, it was probably made just to impress people with images and sound and not information.



posted on Sep, 5 2007 @ 08:25 AM
link   
How can you tell, when you haven't watched it?

Do not post your feelings about this subject if you "haven't got much time" too look into it?




No, I will not watch that video, at least for some time.

I do not have 1 1/2 hour for this




Unfortunately I do not have much time.




If you are referring to that 1:32:39 tape, I do not have the time to watch it, it's as simple as that. 1:32:39 is almost half of my free time each day.


You are telling us three times here that you don't have time....

THEN WHY THE HELL ARE YOU HERE?

Go do some research on the subject, watch the tape with mr. Serada and THEN COME BACK


Until then,

You are ignored... Bye Bye!!

[edit on 5-9-2007 by PureET]



posted on Sep, 5 2007 @ 08:33 AM
link   
I think that the pulsating effect might be because they are spinning saucers and catching the light as they spin. Because they are out of focus and far away it looks like they are pulsing. I've noticed on other UFO videos (in atmosphere) this same flashing effect from a spinning disk.



posted on Sep, 5 2007 @ 08:37 AM
link   
No it is a bit different,


When you watch the vid with mr. serada you will see these "pulses" are generated from within the ship,

And it looks like it's just flashing, but in fact when slowed down you can see a spiral shaped pulse moving outwards from the ship.. You can see it moves the same way our galaxy does.

These ships are actualy not spinning, but the energy source within these ships does.


-PureET

[edit on 5-9-2007 by PureET]

[edit on 5-9-2007 by PureET]



posted on Sep, 5 2007 @ 08:49 AM
link   
well the galaxy as a whole doesn't really move as such because all the individual stars make their own orbits, so that analogy isn't too good. I know what you mean though.



posted on Sep, 5 2007 @ 09:01 AM
link   
P.S. I have watched the Serada video. I just don't think all of his conclusions are correct. Like the size of the ship flying behind the tether. It seems out of focus to me. We are clearly seeing craft that are beyond our experience though.



posted on Sep, 5 2007 @ 09:33 AM
link   
These objects don't appear to be ships, but rather huge space life
forms that are curious. They seem to react just like fish in the
deep that swirl to a diver's light. Not intelligent based on our
standards, but living life nevertheless. Maybe they exist on a
different physical plane that's only visible in the viewing mode
that the shuttle cameras were in. Our spacecraft would have
been colliding with them way back in the early days if these
entities existed in our dimension. Right?



posted on Sep, 5 2007 @ 12:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by commodore64
When they change directions? I dont see it. Can you give at which moment?


I don't like stupid teasing like this, and i think it souldn't be allowed by moderators.



posted on Sep, 5 2007 @ 01:51 PM
link   
Well ArMaP, we all have our own thoughts about this, but if you have´nt done your research on this (like watching the video) before posting and say something that you don´t know about, then don´t post.

Can anyone imagine that ALL of the paranormal, alien, ufo pictures, and stories in the history, even the prehistoric drawings the cavemen did are fake ?... I can´t.



posted on Sep, 5 2007 @ 03:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by Luminal
Well ArMaP, we all have our own thoughts about this, but if you have´nt done your research on this (like watching the video) before posting and say something that you don´t know about, then don´t post.
I didn't saw the 1:32:39 video with Mr. Serada (or is it Sereda?), but I saw the video that we are supposedly discussing, the one with the objects passing in front of the camera that was pointing to the tether.

My thoughts are based on that video and on my personal experience.



posted on Sep, 5 2007 @ 05:07 PM
link   
I still say those things could be darn near anything, and there simply is no way to investigate this beyond internet arguments. I will say, given that they could be anything, I think it is ignorant to jump to the most remote conclusion.



new topics

top topics



 
5
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join